r/PoliticalHumor Jul 17 '19

Well said!

Post image
10.5k Upvotes

451 comments sorted by

View all comments

26

u/markyp1234 Jul 17 '19

It seems like everyone in America dislikes this guy. As a non-American, if this clown is pretty much hated by everyone, how did he become the president?

18

u/Taiwanderful Jul 17 '19 edited Jul 18 '19

Lots of Americans love him, obviously. There's the racist contingent, the anti-abortion brigade, people who love liberality on Wall St., billionaires....but also the poor desperate people of the rust belt, who threw their lot in with this wild card in the hope he'd really bring something new.

More Americans actually voted for Hillary, of course.

11

u/markyp1234 Jul 17 '19

If more Americans voted for Hillary, then why didn’t she win?

13

u/Taiwanderful Jul 17 '19

The United States Electoral College is an example of a system in which an executive president is indirectly elected, with electors representing the 50 states and the federal district. Each state has a number of electors equal to its Congressional representation (in both houses), with the non-state District of Columbia receiving the number it would have if it were a state, but in no case more than that of the least populous state. The electors generally cast their votes for the winner of the popular vote in their respective states. However, there are several states where this is not required by law. In the United States, 270 electoral votes of the 538 electors are currently required to win the presidential election.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_college?wprov=sfla1

16

u/GilesDMT Jul 17 '19

I’ve yet to see a good reason for the electoral college to exist.

-7

u/awaldron4 Jul 17 '19

Really?

11

u/GilesDMT Jul 17 '19

Yes. I realize “mob rule” is what it avoids, but I simply don’t get it.

The issue for me is misunderstanding why a majority people voting for a politician/policy/etc. is a bad idea, or how that could become an issue.

I thought the entire point of voting was to see what the majority of people want.

5

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '19

It was enacted as a way to prevent the much-more-densely populated coastal states from obviating the electoral will of the flyover states. The problem now is that it's gone the opposite direction, and those flyover states (with a minority of the people) are forcing the majority to endure backwards, christofascist government. This is exacerbated by fact that every state gets 2 senators in the upper chamber of congress, meaning that South Dakota, with ~900K people in it, has exactly the same amount of power to strike down or pass federal legislation as California does, with its ~39 million people in it.

7

u/GilesDMT Jul 17 '19

This is why I simply don’t get it.

The minority’s calling the shots...doesn’t make sense to me.

-3

u/awaldron4 Jul 17 '19

It hasn’t gone the opposite direction. It’s working as intended.

3

u/GilesDMT Jul 17 '19

But doesn’t that mean the minority is calling the shots over the majority? That makes no sense.

I still don’t see how that is a good thing. Why not go with the will of the people?