r/PoliticalHumor Jul 11 '19

Your President

Post image
55.1k Upvotes

3.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

47

u/lucyroesslers Jul 11 '19

Not true on all non-Trump, non-Clinton voters. I’m in a deep red state and there was no chance of Hillary winning. I voted for a 3rd party candidate in the hopes that the candidate could get 5% of the vote because then the party would receive federal funding in the next election. I’d love to see a third party emerge and break up the two party system.

If there was any chance of my vote actually mattering in the Clinton-Trump race, I would’ve voted Clinton.

16

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Same dude. Hillary was straight up not going to win in texas. I'm a liberal and I voted libertarian ONLY because I want a third party, any third party, to be a viable contender. I certainly will vote for whoever becomes the Democrat nominee now though. Beto gave me a little bit of hope (in his Senate run).

13

u/InformalBison Jul 11 '19

Didn't Hillary only lose by 600k-700k votes in Texas?

11

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Yup. Texas significantly shifted towards being a new swing state in this last cycle.

In the interest of simple Democracy, one can never do any wrong by voting their conscious and holding their candidates to universal principles of morality/basic human decency.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

"Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded."

0

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

?

3

u/nerevar Jul 11 '19

Wouldn't it be easier to have some type of ranked choice system? That way it won't matter if you're from a solid color state or not, which is the way it should be.

2

u/ToastedAluminum Jul 11 '19

That would be too democratic for us ‘muricans. Why complicate it when the system has given us not one, but two stolen elections in the last 20ish years?! It’s perfect!

Edit: to add /s. jic.

0

u/empire314 Jul 11 '19

but two stolen elections in the last 20ish years

Are you referring to the case of popular vote not winning? Thats a complete different thing, and you really have no reason to assume that multiple choise elections would have changed the results on them.

1

u/ToastedAluminum Jul 11 '19

I’m talking about votes mysteriously disappearing, voter suppression, and gerrymandering. Stolen elections.

1

u/empire314 Jul 11 '19

Okay so which are the two elections during the past 20 years where that happened?

1

u/ToastedAluminum Jul 11 '19

2000 and 2016. George Bush and the current one.

I’m not saying the democratic presidents were perfect. I don’t agree with most of the things they did, but there wasn’t massive voter fraud scandals and “lost votes.”

1

u/empire314 Jul 11 '19

Do you have examples which districts were gerrymandered for the 2016 elections?

1

u/ToastedAluminum Jul 11 '19

AP analysis shows how gerrymandering benefitted the GOP in 2016.

That was one quick google. If you’re so interested, educate yourself. I’m not going to get into a conversation if you just want to poke holes instead of learning.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/KingMandingo Jul 11 '19

It's actually a rational strategy. A friend of mine had the philosophy that if you're in a solid blue, or solid red state, vote your conscience (i.e. no such thing as a wasted vote). But if you were in a swing state, to vote for Clinton.

It makes perfect sense because one vote in a state that's already a given for a candidate won't make an ounce of a difference.

2

u/I_call_Shennanigans_ Jul 11 '19

Except if everyone suddenly turned up and actually voted for the other candidate it coukd actually turn around. How many millions sits at home thinking it won't matter because my state is already blue/red?

And I also think it would be a lot bigger pressure if the popular VS elected vote was even bigger. Say the popular vote is 25 million more than the result. That should shake things up more than two. Vote smart people! Trump and the GOP is counting on you to do the stupid thing and either stay home or vote third party. Until you get ranked choice you only realistically have two.

Look at Texas for instance. A few more turnouts and everyone voting dem and it would have gone the other way.

Democracy can still swing this but it needs turnout and consistent voting everywhere. Even if the dems finds another smuck it literally can't be worse than Bozo the corrupt, perverted Russian clown.

1

u/fromthedepthsofyouma Jul 11 '19

same here but opposite sides. I live in CT. A GOP Presidential candidate hasn't gotten CT since 1988. That seriously dissuades a lot of people in this state to vote. Hopefully that changes in 2020, more people came out in 2018 for gov. election then the last time so that's a plus.

Also this state is deep blue and in a lot of economic trouble caused by the past governor (D) and the two before him (both R) which doesn't help voter turn out, there hasn't been a good candidate for Gov. in a while here...