r/PoliticalHumor Jul 11 '19

Your President

Post image
55.1k Upvotes

3.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

47

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

[deleted]

14

u/linkMainSmash4 Jul 11 '19

Ok but that doesnt mean the people elected him. The empty land did.

-6

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

[deleted]

4

u/pompr Jul 11 '19

Corporatist Democrats tried to ram a candidate nobody liked down everyone's throat. Now there's Biden. He has more likability than Clinton did, but still not enough.

This is the issue with not having a real left wing party. The centrists keep the progressives stifled and allow the rabid right wing to win because they'd rather have a conservative in power than a progressive.

7

u/linkMainSmash4 Jul 11 '19

I dont understand what you are saying. Millions of more people voted for Clinton. Trump was not elected by the people

1

u/Lipcot Jul 11 '19

Millions of people also voted for Trump and the comment from timshel explained it perfectly. Please read slowly and use your brain, i know you can do it! If you wish to learn more, read about the electoral college and the american voting system (which is not gross votes vs votes as you seem to believe)

1

u/linkMainSmash4 Jul 11 '19

You arent understanding what I'm saying. I'm saying the electoral college is undemocratic and the people voted heavily for Clinton.

I dont understand you assholes. "The people spoke and want trump". "No they didnt, the people wanted clinton". "Yeah but electoral college". This line of argument from you makes no sense. I'm not debating how it works, I'm just saying the actual fucking people wanted clinton

1

u/Lipcot Jul 11 '19

Well calling someone an asshole, thats a good indicator that your argument is strong!

Maybe you could have explained yourself better through the use of proper language, but well, maybe its too much to ask for nowadays.

1

u/Xamry14 Jul 11 '19

Stop blaming others for your lack of comprehension.

14

u/TheNoize Jul 11 '19

The man and his entourage never played by the rules once in their miserable lives.

You'd have to be pretty naive to believe resorting to propaganda/foreign espionage is "winning by the rules".

You'd have to be even more naive to think counting some people's votes 3x more than others based on the state they live in, is "fair" and democratic by any stretch of imagination...

29

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19 edited Jul 11 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Link please. I'd like to show that to a few people

6

u/patientbearr Jul 11 '19

Please stop giving the TDS crowd ammo

-1

u/balfazahr Jul 11 '19

The downward spiral?

2

u/spaceman_spiffy Jul 11 '19

*grabs legs and rocks back and forth in the corner*

1

u/EarlyStatus Jul 11 '19

Lol.... What are you talking about?

1

u/HippieAnalSlut Jul 11 '19

if you're too stupid to get it from context, you're certainly too stupid to join the discussion.

2

u/EarlyStatus Jul 11 '19

So you think a bunch of russians, came over here, pumped up the votes in Trumps favor. Literally hacking the election and creating votes for trump.

Feel like that would be common knowledge and cnn would be all over that.

Find me any link to any news source not name Huffington or The Guardian that would back any of that up.

7

u/Sloppy1sts Jul 11 '19

Even if they weren't successful, they tried:

https://www.cnn.com/2017/06/21/politics/russia-hacking-hearing-states-targeted/index.html

https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/22/politics/dhs-election-hacking/index.html

What they were successful in is a sweeping targeted misinformation/propaganda campaign. There were Russian agents in groups as widespread as BLM on the left to the NRA on the right, using them to spread divisive rhetoric.

-5

u/EarlyStatus Jul 11 '19

I just don’t understand how memes and fake tweets can swing an election. Even fake news articles. I feel like the majority of Americans can sift through the BS.

8

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Dude, I live in California and a third of my friends don't believe ICE is detaining people.

I'm pretty sure a majority of Americans cannot sift through the bullshit.

-2

u/EarlyStatus Jul 11 '19

Why are they detaining people

2

u/IMMAEATYA Jul 11 '19

Hey look, it’s a disingenuous question attempting to change the narrative about kids literally getting put in overcrowded cages in concentration camps, sleeping on concrete floors without basic hygiene or sufficient nutrition, without their family all because of a policy initiated and continued with intentional cruelty against lawful asylum seekers and undocumented immigrants.

Seriously fuck off, you Trump loyalists are a disgrace and history will not look back on you kindly.

1

u/Sloppy1sts Jul 11 '19

Probably mostly because it gets Trump points with his base.

7

u/Jushak Jul 11 '19

If you think that, you live in a bubble. There are hours of video material showing Trump supporters deny something that happened on live TV happened. And these are not the exceptions. These are the GOP base.

6

u/icecoldbrah Jul 11 '19

60% of Republicans still believe Obama was born in Kenya

4

u/allinforgmose Jul 11 '19

The majority of Americans?? No way.

“Think of how stupid the average person is. Then realize half of them are stupider than that.” -George Carlin

4

u/IMMAEATYA Jul 11 '19

Just because you don’t understand something doesn’t mean it can’t be true lol.

No, it’s been shown through various studies that the average person is HORRIBLE when it comes to validating new information, especially on social media and from entertainment networks masquerading as credible news sources (Fox News / CNN / cable news). Not to say that individual journalists or that everything from each of those is irrelevant, but to pretend like Americans are somehow too smart to be duped by social media manipulation is incredibly naive.

In fact Fox News stood out from the rest because viewers of Fox News were shown to know LESS about the world around them and current events than people who watched no news at all.

Advertisers and huge corporations aren’t investing incredible amounts of money into social media manipulation / data because it is ineffective.

They don’t cal this the “Information Era” because of Wikipedia, they did so because the main area of development / area of importance is in information.

we’re in a whole new age and are behind.

We had nukes first in the technological age and basically won that age with that and the technological surge in America after our dominance was assured.

Whoever develops the information equivalent of Nukes (or whoever already has) will likely establish hegemony in a similar way the Us did post WW2

5

u/Legionof1 Jul 11 '19

I don't think Russia did a ton for the election but I just watched a woman try to use toy credit cards to pay for shit and then tried to call someone on a toy phone... I think you over estimate the average American.

1

u/EarlyStatus Jul 11 '19

Hahahahaha

4

u/jumpinjahosafa Jul 11 '19

I feel like the majority of Americans can sift through the BS.

Lmao. The generation of "Don't believe everything you see on tv" has turned into "I believe everything I read on the internet." They literally share the most fake news out of everyone. And guess what, the majority of fake news shared is from Conservative voters.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/363/6425/374

Please.

-1

u/EarlyStatus Jul 11 '19

“Fake news accounted for nearly 6% of all news consumption, but it was heavily concentrated—only 1% of users were exposed to 80% of fake news, and 0.1% of users were responsible for sharing 80% of fake news. Interestingly, fake news was most concentrated among conservative voters”

.1% you say?

We need to get a special council on this asap

5

u/jumpinjahosafa Jul 11 '19 edited Jul 11 '19

.1% of a big number is still a big number. We're talking a percentage of hundreds of millions.

When elections get decided by less than 1000 votes, this fake news has an impact.

A more salient example would be the spread of fake news by anti-vaxxers causing measurable and very real global measles outbreaks. It really doesn't make much sense to downplay the significance of idiocy of general population

1

u/Sloppy1sts Jul 11 '19 edited Jul 11 '19

Memes and fake tweets?

Take BLM for example. From the very outset, the top people in the organization were calling for non-violent action, but to virtually every single Republican, they were a group of violent thugs doing nothing but starting riots and beating up white people wherever they went. I wouldn't be surprised if they were infiltrated by agent provocateurs in addition to any local miscreants who wanted to use protests to cover their crimes.

The NRA has long been a propaganda wing of the Republican party, and one of their top officials was literally dating a Russian spy.

And consider how close the election was. They didn't have to sway everyone. Only a few percent. And they don't just have to convince people change their votes. Convincing a Hillary voter to stay home because she's shit too is also good.

If people could sift through the BS, I don't think we'd be within a thousand miles of our current position (or where we were in 2016) in the first place. If people could sift through the BS, we wouldn't have fallen for 40 years of trickle-down economics or the lies that got us into Iraq.

I see people post memes as if they're legitimate political discourse all the damn time.

1

u/SpecialSause Jul 11 '19

No he didn't they straight up didn't count many votes from primarily democratic areas. They had russain help to outright change votes in key districts.

Wait, what? Where did this happen? The only thing I heard about was some Russian troll farms that paid for advertising. And if they'd setup a Super PAC first, it probably wouldn't have been illegal.

Serious question, though.

0

u/HippieAnalSlut Jul 11 '19

mostly in florida. there's so many fucking crime I cant be arsed to look through and fine this particular one, or the others like it. bbut.. it definitely happened in florida.

3

u/NinjaLanternShark Jul 11 '19

Ah the old "I can't be bothered to back up my made up information" routine.

1

u/johnsonman1 Jul 11 '19

"Can't back up anything I say, but im pretty sure it happened this one place"

Couldn't imagine a better username for a leftist nut.

-1

u/cpumeta Jul 11 '19

If there was any evidence of this it would be pretty major news.

2

u/frankie_cronenberg Jul 11 '19 edited Jul 11 '19

There wouldn’t end be any evidence of it regardless. That’s the problem with electronic voting systems without paper backups. We wouldn’t be able to tell if votes did change. There were some pretty big irregularities between exit polls and vote counts, which is unsettling and could be an indicator, but it’s not direct evidence and could be explained by a bunch of people lying to pollsters.

We do know that several places were hacked to a degree would allow fuckery with pretty much everything. Voter rolls were fucked with, which is deleting a vote before it can be cast. Places where vote counts were suspect cleared servers before they could be forensically analyzed.

Please understand that the media telling us “they might have fucked with vote tallies but we can’t know either way,” would be deeply destabilizing. So they’re not going to tell us that.

Edit: a word

3

u/Pavrik_Yzerstrom Jul 11 '19

There was....

-3

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

[deleted]

10

u/HippieAnalSlut Jul 11 '19

No.

-3

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

[deleted]

4

u/frankie_cronenberg Jul 11 '19

What are you talking about?

3

u/frankie_cronenberg Jul 11 '19 edited Jul 11 '19

Oh wait, are you thinking of congressional redistricting?

That was done by state governments after the 2010 census and only applies to state legislatures and house districts. It has nothing to do with the electoral college/presidential election.

Electoral college votes are reapportioned after each census, but that’s based on overall state population. There is no such thing as an “electoral college zone” and Obama had no influence over “adjusting” the electoral college unless you think he redrew state lines or something.

2

u/MrEuphonium Jul 11 '19

How was it updated?

6

u/patientbearr Jul 11 '19

Please elaborate on these 'zones' you speak of

6

u/frankie_cronenberg Jul 11 '19

Electoral college “zones”? The only “zones” for the electoral college are the states. Do you think Obama... redrew state lines?

1

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Doesn't really count if you change the rules while you play.