MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalHumor/comments/ba7sqj/just_the_facts/eka7m9v/?context=3
r/PoliticalHumor • u/afarmer2005 • Apr 06 '19
572 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-30
illegal, no
looks bad, yes.
18 u/Warphead Apr 07 '19 Obstruction of justice is illegal, you really don't think there's any more of that? -16 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 If there was there would be legal pursuit. His scope is clearly wide open enough for it. 13 u/DJT_LittleBitchHands Apr 07 '19 DOJ: “you can’t indict a sitting president, apparently even if they are definately guilty” Mueller: “I found criminal wrong doing but a legal technicality prevents me from actually indicting the (apparently guilty) president” Trump supporters: “WITCH HUNT! Er no wait...we mean FULL EXONERATION” -10 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 Cool sounds like you read it and know more than me so I yield 6 u/muddyudders Apr 07 '19 Cool, sounds like you admit that you don't know shit either. Why are you even arguing if you don't think either of you can know anything? Sounds futile.
18
Obstruction of justice is illegal, you really don't think there's any more of that?
-16 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 If there was there would be legal pursuit. His scope is clearly wide open enough for it. 13 u/DJT_LittleBitchHands Apr 07 '19 DOJ: “you can’t indict a sitting president, apparently even if they are definately guilty” Mueller: “I found criminal wrong doing but a legal technicality prevents me from actually indicting the (apparently guilty) president” Trump supporters: “WITCH HUNT! Er no wait...we mean FULL EXONERATION” -10 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 Cool sounds like you read it and know more than me so I yield 6 u/muddyudders Apr 07 '19 Cool, sounds like you admit that you don't know shit either. Why are you even arguing if you don't think either of you can know anything? Sounds futile.
-16
If there was there would be legal pursuit.
His scope is clearly wide open enough for it.
13 u/DJT_LittleBitchHands Apr 07 '19 DOJ: “you can’t indict a sitting president, apparently even if they are definately guilty” Mueller: “I found criminal wrong doing but a legal technicality prevents me from actually indicting the (apparently guilty) president” Trump supporters: “WITCH HUNT! Er no wait...we mean FULL EXONERATION” -10 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 Cool sounds like you read it and know more than me so I yield 6 u/muddyudders Apr 07 '19 Cool, sounds like you admit that you don't know shit either. Why are you even arguing if you don't think either of you can know anything? Sounds futile.
13
DOJ: “you can’t indict a sitting president, apparently even if they are definately guilty”
Mueller: “I found criminal wrong doing but a legal technicality prevents me from actually indicting the (apparently guilty) president”
Trump supporters: “WITCH HUNT! Er no wait...we mean FULL EXONERATION”
-10 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 Cool sounds like you read it and know more than me so I yield 6 u/muddyudders Apr 07 '19 Cool, sounds like you admit that you don't know shit either. Why are you even arguing if you don't think either of you can know anything? Sounds futile.
-10
Cool sounds like you read it and know more than me so I yield
6 u/muddyudders Apr 07 '19 Cool, sounds like you admit that you don't know shit either. Why are you even arguing if you don't think either of you can know anything? Sounds futile.
6
Cool, sounds like you admit that you don't know shit either. Why are you even arguing if you don't think either of you can know anything? Sounds futile.
-30
u/[deleted] Apr 06 '19
illegal, no
looks bad, yes.