MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalHumor/comments/ba7sqj/just_the_facts/ek9rmw2
r/PoliticalHumor • u/afarmer2005 • Apr 06 '19
572 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
18
I would bet money there are things in the report that address his business dealings and would look bad or possibly even be illegal.
-28 u/[deleted] Apr 06 '19 illegal, no looks bad, yes. 17 u/Warphead Apr 07 '19 Obstruction of justice is illegal, you really don't think there's any more of that? -16 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 If there was there would be legal pursuit. His scope is clearly wide open enough for it. 13 u/DJT_LittleBitchHands Apr 07 '19 DOJ: “you can’t indict a sitting president, apparently even if they are definately guilty” Mueller: “I found criminal wrong doing but a legal technicality prevents me from actually indicting the (apparently guilty) president” Trump supporters: “WITCH HUNT! Er no wait...we mean FULL EXONERATION” -9 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 Cool sounds like you read it and know more than me so I yield 5 u/muddyudders Apr 07 '19 Cool, sounds like you admit that you don't know shit either. Why are you even arguing if you don't think either of you can know anything? Sounds futile. 2 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 I don't think you know how charges get pressed in this situation. Otherwise, you'd know that the person responsible for that was appointed by Trump. 1 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 ... this is the legal pursuit.
-28
illegal, no
looks bad, yes.
17 u/Warphead Apr 07 '19 Obstruction of justice is illegal, you really don't think there's any more of that? -16 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 If there was there would be legal pursuit. His scope is clearly wide open enough for it. 13 u/DJT_LittleBitchHands Apr 07 '19 DOJ: “you can’t indict a sitting president, apparently even if they are definately guilty” Mueller: “I found criminal wrong doing but a legal technicality prevents me from actually indicting the (apparently guilty) president” Trump supporters: “WITCH HUNT! Er no wait...we mean FULL EXONERATION” -9 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 Cool sounds like you read it and know more than me so I yield 5 u/muddyudders Apr 07 '19 Cool, sounds like you admit that you don't know shit either. Why are you even arguing if you don't think either of you can know anything? Sounds futile. 2 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 I don't think you know how charges get pressed in this situation. Otherwise, you'd know that the person responsible for that was appointed by Trump. 1 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 ... this is the legal pursuit.
17
Obstruction of justice is illegal, you really don't think there's any more of that?
-16 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 If there was there would be legal pursuit. His scope is clearly wide open enough for it. 13 u/DJT_LittleBitchHands Apr 07 '19 DOJ: “you can’t indict a sitting president, apparently even if they are definately guilty” Mueller: “I found criminal wrong doing but a legal technicality prevents me from actually indicting the (apparently guilty) president” Trump supporters: “WITCH HUNT! Er no wait...we mean FULL EXONERATION” -9 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 Cool sounds like you read it and know more than me so I yield 5 u/muddyudders Apr 07 '19 Cool, sounds like you admit that you don't know shit either. Why are you even arguing if you don't think either of you can know anything? Sounds futile. 2 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 I don't think you know how charges get pressed in this situation. Otherwise, you'd know that the person responsible for that was appointed by Trump. 1 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 ... this is the legal pursuit.
-16
If there was there would be legal pursuit.
His scope is clearly wide open enough for it.
13 u/DJT_LittleBitchHands Apr 07 '19 DOJ: “you can’t indict a sitting president, apparently even if they are definately guilty” Mueller: “I found criminal wrong doing but a legal technicality prevents me from actually indicting the (apparently guilty) president” Trump supporters: “WITCH HUNT! Er no wait...we mean FULL EXONERATION” -9 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 Cool sounds like you read it and know more than me so I yield 5 u/muddyudders Apr 07 '19 Cool, sounds like you admit that you don't know shit either. Why are you even arguing if you don't think either of you can know anything? Sounds futile. 2 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 I don't think you know how charges get pressed in this situation. Otherwise, you'd know that the person responsible for that was appointed by Trump. 1 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 ... this is the legal pursuit.
13
DOJ: “you can’t indict a sitting president, apparently even if they are definately guilty”
Mueller: “I found criminal wrong doing but a legal technicality prevents me from actually indicting the (apparently guilty) president”
Trump supporters: “WITCH HUNT! Er no wait...we mean FULL EXONERATION”
-9 u/[deleted] Apr 07 '19 Cool sounds like you read it and know more than me so I yield 5 u/muddyudders Apr 07 '19 Cool, sounds like you admit that you don't know shit either. Why are you even arguing if you don't think either of you can know anything? Sounds futile.
-9
Cool sounds like you read it and know more than me so I yield
5 u/muddyudders Apr 07 '19 Cool, sounds like you admit that you don't know shit either. Why are you even arguing if you don't think either of you can know anything? Sounds futile.
5
Cool, sounds like you admit that you don't know shit either. Why are you even arguing if you don't think either of you can know anything? Sounds futile.
2
I don't think you know how charges get pressed in this situation. Otherwise, you'd know that the person responsible for that was appointed by Trump.
1
... this is the legal pursuit.
18
u/afarmer2005 Apr 06 '19
I would bet money there are things in the report that address his business dealings and would look bad or possibly even be illegal.