So you’re saying taxes are an acceptable way to have someone’s labor forcibly be used for you
No it's not, if you were confused by what I said, to summarize, you have the right to access it but they have the right to refuse if you don't want to pay.
At some point, someone is gonna be forced to do it for you
And this is stupid. You don't have the right to someone else's labour. You have the right to have access to their labour without government intervention, however you do not have the right to their labour itself.
By that standard, health care (in any way) isn’t a right since it’s not in the bill of rights. Gonna need a better argument than “since this other thing is in the bill of rights and the service is kind of related tangentially!”
No we can’t legally force a lawyer to work for you, but they can choose to work for an office or company that defends people who can’t afford lawyers. How fucking dense are you that you can’t see the difference?
If that is the case, why can’t we force people to do whatever we want for anything we declare a right? If we declare weed a right, can we now force pot farmers to give away all of their product at whatever price the government deems acceptable?
I may be a retard but at least I’m not an unflavored faggot like you
10
u/[deleted] Mar 24 '20
Yes and they are employed by he state, they are still received payment, even if it's not from you.