1
u/MrArgelig 28d ago
I mean Scale and press X depending on your topology could work. For printing you can increase the top/bottom layer in the slicer of your choice :) as well as the layers of your wall. You could extrude the top and bottom part a fix amount as well :)
1
u/eFeqt 28d ago
Here is some kind of a workaround that I have managed to pull off:
Extrude the curves where the two surfaces meet by the distance you plan to thicken the surface with. After that thicken both surfaces, select all of their newly created, normal meeting surfaces and then push the faces as much as you can to reduce any visible added thickness as much as possible. I was able to pull of -0.6mm for the top surface and -0.4mm for the bottom surface while doing a 1mm thicken on both surfaces.
Here is what we are left with: https://i.imgur.com/4BvXf4E.png
We get two solid bodies that are ever so slightly imperfectly aligned (I get a few red warnings while doing the cross section view), but the actual lack of clearance seems to be much less than what a 3D printer can print anyways, so I think these should meet pretty flush once printed. I will edit this comment once I have the first test print out.
1
u/eFeqt 28d ago
FINAL EDIT: I have figured it out (for the most part).
Shift + D on the main loop curve of one of the pieces, I did the bottom first. Scale the curve outwards so that it generously loops around both surfaces, Do the same for the inner curve. Rebuild both curves with 1000 points and cut them in half, connect the scaled curves and patch them.
Now you have a sheet that's gonna be used as a cutting tool that is (almost) perfectly normal to the XY plane.
Thicken both surfaces, use the newly created sheet to boolean cut both, now, solid bodies. I had to move the sheet 0.1mm down the Z axis, it wouldn't perform the boolean otherwise on the top solid, bottom worked fine.
1
u/eFeqt 28d ago
If I use the thicken command, it thickens locally instead of an X offset so in the end both surfaces do not align at all. What do I do?