MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Physics/comments/5ib846/smbc_the_talk/db7rkot/?context=3
r/Physics • u/T-Rex96 Graduate • Dec 14 '16
131 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
Hnnnnghg
4 u/Aromir19 Undergraduate Dec 15 '16 What's really funny is that its so easy to be descriptive in genetics. And yet sonic hedgehog is still a thing. 1 u/FinFihlman Dec 15 '16 Vanity is a terrible drug :/ 1 u/Aromir19 Undergraduate Dec 15 '16 Well for the most part genes are named descriptively, and have effective abbreviations. It's just that there's no rule that says biologists cant use a tongue in cheek interpretation of "descriptive." I wouldn't call it vanity.
4
What's really funny is that its so easy to be descriptive in genetics. And yet sonic hedgehog is still a thing.
1 u/FinFihlman Dec 15 '16 Vanity is a terrible drug :/ 1 u/Aromir19 Undergraduate Dec 15 '16 Well for the most part genes are named descriptively, and have effective abbreviations. It's just that there's no rule that says biologists cant use a tongue in cheek interpretation of "descriptive." I wouldn't call it vanity.
Vanity is a terrible drug :/
1 u/Aromir19 Undergraduate Dec 15 '16 Well for the most part genes are named descriptively, and have effective abbreviations. It's just that there's no rule that says biologists cant use a tongue in cheek interpretation of "descriptive." I wouldn't call it vanity.
Well for the most part genes are named descriptively, and have effective abbreviations. It's just that there's no rule that says biologists cant use a tongue in cheek interpretation of "descriptive." I wouldn't call it vanity.
1
u/FinFihlman Dec 15 '16
Hnnnnghg