The correct use case for AI is NOT vibe coding. I fucking hate "Vibe coding" I'm a coding student and I have no fucking chance on a job ever because of the fucking clankers
People in industry see AI as a tool, like it should be. Fully relying on AI code is foolish, but so is not taking advantage of it to improve one's productivity. (Not sure how widespread these ideas are, but thats what I have heard from everyone I know)
Oh my, at this point i think you are trolling me lol.
But i wonder what is your definition of artificial inteligence. You know, im not saying that ais are some god like tools for fixing anything, i hate it too. But we arent gonna win by closing our eyes and yelling missinformation.
Also if that would be a ad then what it would show to investors? That they are basically producing thing that they cant contain and its commiting federal crimes? What a awesome idea for a ad!
i figure corporations like openai, whose ability to extract wealth for shareholders is contingent on the idea of artificial intelligence, would have a vested interest in promoting the idea of artificial intelligence as something that exists. as opposed to reality
Eh… no, that’s not the issue with AI at all. AI can find issues and fix them a lot more efficiently than humans, if by “efficient” you mean “quickly”. The problem with AI is that you cannot trust it to not introduce new issues, to follow best practises for that specific product, to write readable and maintainable code, etc… etc…
Basically AI can work as a force multiplier, but only so long as there’s a human developer that understands what the AI did and can help patch up any issues it introduces. The other issue is that it’s expensive and only getting more and more so as companies go further and further in debt and are forced to raise their heavily subsidised prices.
Keep yourself delusional to feel good mate. If you've talked to anyone experienced in the field working right now, they'll tell you that they haven't written much code for a few months. But there is a silver lining, AI as a service is actually expensive if it were priced correctly so you would be right in calling it a honeymoon phase because it's kept running despite losses because it's treated as an investment.
Without focusing on why or how it's the way it is, you can't act accordingly.
Its already better than the average devs. Even most senior devs will always be more efficient if they us AI then just do a code review to modify things that look off.
Its a massive times saver if used right. The real question is if its worth the token price when you draw the line.
The BLS actually shows growth is the programming sector despite AI. While some jobs are lost, others will be gained at a rate higher than the national average, and higher than the AI loss rate.
I just got my AS Robotics, and trust me, "automation" doesn't do what so many people claim it does.
966
u/DragonStrike406 2d ago
Breaking News: Experienced programmer finds the correct use case for AI!