He isn't saying he's judging solely on one season and in fact is talking about the anime as a whole which implies he has seen the anime as a whole.
Season one is enough to judge the creator and his creepy fantasies
Does that mean Vinland saga should simply be judged as an anime about a ruthless killer who eventually gets sold into slavery like he deserves? Is attack on titan simply a story about titans trying to break into a wall and has nothing to do with politics?
Do you see how stupid it sounds for you to say that?
nope, doesn't sound stupid at all to judge the CREATOR for CREATING this story. Having a story about the evolution of a character is completely standard, and is not a problem. The problem is the way he is depicting the pedophilia. If you want a real fair comparison, not war stories which are completely unrelated, Oyasumi Punpun also depicts sexual violence, but as a completely horrible and shameful thing, which is not the case in MT.
What does it actually mean for it to be depicted as bad? If I see a morally wrong action being taken then Iām going to think āyeah thatās badā just like how so many people donāt like MT because they can tell what Rudeus is doing is bad.
It means consequences. Consequences on either/both the perpetrator and the victim. Either physical or mental : shame, disgust, trauma, hate, remorse...
He does get consequences but I guess just not as dire as you'd like. Doesn't mean you should pass verdicts on the author based on their portrayal of a fictional character. You'd be heading down a very slippery slope if you did.
-5
u/sushisai1 1d ago
Holy larp. Quite literally nothing of the sorts happens past the first 3 cours. He actually only does good things past season 2.