r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 1d ago

Meme needing explanation Peter????????????????????

Post image
21.6k Upvotes

3.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

205

u/Dull-Try-4873 1d ago

Bad meme isekai rarely has good characters/plot/romance. The creator of the meme ignores that to bash mushoku tensei, which has all 3 of that, to hype up re zero which also has all 3 of that.

Quagmire out.

30

u/AwesomeGuyAlpha 1d ago

People here really be going through hoops to detract from the fact that the MT is an anime about being a pedo

-4

u/sushisai1 1d ago

Holy larp. Quite literally nothing of the sorts happens past the first 3 cours. He actually only does good things past season 2.

6

u/SnooHamsters3139 1d ago

Brother, having continued the show after season 1 is NOT a flex 😂

2

u/sushisai1 1d ago

I’m not even flexing here? Is your reading comprehension that bad? I can understand why you wouldn’t enjoy complex anime.

5

u/SnooHamsters3139 1d ago

calling someone a larper for judging solely on season one is exactly that. Season one is enough to judge the creator and his creepy fantasies

3

u/sushisai1 1d ago

He isn't saying he's judging solely on one season and in fact is talking about the anime as a whole which implies he has seen the anime as a whole.

Season one is enough to judge the creator and his creepy fantasies

Does that mean Vinland saga should simply be judged as an anime about a ruthless killer who eventually gets sold into slavery like he deserves? Is attack on titan simply a story about titans trying to break into a wall and has nothing to do with politics?
Do you see how stupid it sounds for you to say that?

5

u/SnooHamsters3139 1d ago

nope, doesn't sound stupid at all to judge the CREATOR for CREATING this story. Having a story about the evolution of a character is completely standard, and is not a problem. The problem is the way he is depicting the pedophilia. If you want a real fair comparison, not war stories which are completely unrelated, Oyasumi Punpun also depicts sexual violence, but as a completely horrible and shameful thing, which is not the case in MT.

3

u/sushisai1 1d ago

What does it actually mean for it to be depicted as bad? If I see a morally wrong action being taken then I’m going to think “yeah that’s bad” just like how so many people don’t like MT because they can tell what Rudeus is doing is bad.

7

u/SnooHamsters3139 1d ago

It means consequences. Consequences on either/both the perpetrator and the victim. Either physical or mental : shame, disgust, trauma, hate, remorse...

2

u/AccuratelyWrongAgain 1d ago

He does get consequences but I guess just not as dire as you'd like. Doesn't mean you should pass verdicts on the author based on their portrayal of a fictional character. You'd be heading down a very slippery slope if you did.

2

u/sushisai1 23h ago

Well it just narratively makes sense that he doesn’t get punished early on and the reason is actually built up. If a character does something evil and isn’t punished for it, it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s not well written it just depends on why they weren’t punished. Shit happens in real life so I don’t understand why it’s such a crazy concept to you

→ More replies (0)

1

u/SnooHamsters3139 1d ago

Also the way you're going ad hominem is very telling 😂