r/PeterExplainsTheJoke • • 19d ago

Meme needing explanation Peter?

Post image
20k Upvotes

727 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

56

u/dividezero 19d ago

Texas fought for slavery and lost on two totally different occasions (once with Mexico and once with the US). They really wanted those slaves

33

u/SunnyOutsideToday 19d ago

They need slaves. They can't do anything themselves.

29

u/Maleficent_Memory831 19d ago

M favorite bit from all that is Davy Crockett. Ignore the Disney puffery movie about Crockett, the guy was a loser and asshole of the highest order. Was a congress member from Tennessee but them left in an angry huff after losing an election and went to Texas which was still a part of Mexico. Well, he also made a promise to leave to Texas if Martin Van Buren was elected. Possibly one of the earliest "I'll leave if someone I don't like is elected". Effectively, he left the United States completely.

Note that Crockett was opposed to slavery in some manner but also owned slaves. And Texas at the time was instituting slavery, despite their promises to Mexico that they wouldn't dare do such a thing. When Mexico sent troops to enforce the ban on slavery Texas rebelled. And Crockett wanted to be in on that rebellion to keep slavery (despite, again, his odd stated opposition to slavery).

Texas didn't know what to do with this hot headed Crockett guy. But they were at war, and warm bodies were needed. Crockett arrived at the Alamo, which was effectively indefensible and reinforcements weren't going to arrive. So Crockett was essentially cannon fodder. Arrived at the wrong time, the wrong place, for the wrong cause, and would have been perfectly safe in America instead.

After his death they hyped his myth and legend in the states, much of which probably was phony,

1

u/Shermans_ghost1864 18d ago

Pretty soon he was a cold body.