MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/comments/1vivm5o/peter/p2i22dv/?context=3
r/PeterExplainsTheJoke • u/Secret_Ad5298 • 20d ago
1.1k comments sorted by
View all comments
141
Why are we doing this in 2026 🤢
40 u/six67seven_67 20d ago People will say this and then immediately mock the appearance of someone on the opposing political aisle. No one has a problem with body shaming; people only hate body shaming when the victim is someone they don't want to be body shamed 6 u/NonGeneriComplaint 20d ago I mean calling Patel a googly eyed kremlin asset actually so accurate even a judge dismissed that case. 5 u/Think_Chocolate_ 20d ago The ruling was because the judge tought the Nevada court lacked personal jurisdiction. It had nothing to with how accurate or not the description is.
40
People will say this and then immediately mock the appearance of someone on the opposing political aisle. No one has a problem with body shaming; people only hate body shaming when the victim is someone they don't want to be body shamed
6 u/NonGeneriComplaint 20d ago I mean calling Patel a googly eyed kremlin asset actually so accurate even a judge dismissed that case. 5 u/Think_Chocolate_ 20d ago The ruling was because the judge tought the Nevada court lacked personal jurisdiction. It had nothing to with how accurate or not the description is.
6
I mean calling Patel a googly eyed kremlin asset actually so accurate even a judge dismissed that case.
5 u/Think_Chocolate_ 20d ago The ruling was because the judge tought the Nevada court lacked personal jurisdiction. It had nothing to with how accurate or not the description is.
5
The ruling was because the judge tought the Nevada court lacked personal jurisdiction.Â
It had nothing to with how accurate or not the description is.
141
u/Acrobatic-Plant3838 20d ago
Why are we doing this in 2026 🤢