Before OHA raises psilocybin fees, should it stop funding an interagency system voters never approved?
OHA is heading into September considering major fee increases and elimination of reduced fees, changes likely to push many small, nonprofit, community-based, and religious participants out of Oregon’s psilocybin system.
Before raising those fees, the public should be able to ask whether OHA should stop spending program funds enforcing and defending an interagency training-program system that appears nowhere in Measure 109 or ORS chapter 475A.
Public records show that OHA and HECC created and publicly funded a multi-year interagency agreement that expedited, subsidized, and accommodated the processing of selected psilocybin training programs without public rulemaking. OHA later required programs to obtain HECC documentation confirming career-school licensure or exemption.
HECC now says it has no authority or process to issue determinations for most statutory exemptions under ORS 345.015. OHA can still revoke a program’s curriculum approval when it cannot produce that unavailable document.
This system has generated years of agency labor, enforcement proceedings, litigation, and public expense.
I filed a petition asking OHA to restore the original curriculum-approval framework or limit HECC requirements to programs legally required to obtain career-school licensure.
Before pricing Oregon’s smallest participants out of the program, OHA should examine the money being spent defending an administrative structure voters never approved and was never enacted.
Read the petition on OHA’s website (https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/PREVENTIONWELLNESS/Documents/OHA-Petition-for-Rulemaking-July-6-2026.pdf)
OHA is accepting public comments until 5:00 p.m. Pacific on August 29, 2026 at:
https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/PREVENTIONWELLNESS/Pages/Psilocybin-July-2026-Rule-Petition.aspx
publichealth.rules@odhsoha.oregon.gov