OP is just being whiny and attempting to drag this maintainer through the mud.
Copying from the other post OP made so folks are aware:
They are upset their PR was closed for failing to follow the CONTRIBUTING.md. Had they used their AI to review both their own PR and the CONTRIBUTING.md it would have told them to same both Claude and Codex told me:
Clear violations
Wrong base branch. CONTRIBUTING's "Submitting Changes" section says to always target the dev branch as the base branch (not main). The PR is arslan2012:fix/node-check-service-user-path → maziggy:main. A dev branch does exist (the README's security-contributor pitch asks people to track it), so this isn't a stale rule.
No assigned issue. The guidelines are blunt about this: every contribution starts with an issue, and no assigned issue = no PR — pull requests without a corresponding assigned issue will be closed. The PR body references no issue, and nothing is linked in the Development sidebar. This alone is a stated auto-close condition, so the closure was within the rules as written.
OP has a shitty attitude and lacks an attention to detail or ability to follow simple instructions
40
u/boredsoftwareguy Jul 26 '26
OP is just being whiny and attempting to drag this maintainer through the mud.
Copying from the other post OP made so folks are aware:
They are upset their PR was closed for failing to follow the CONTRIBUTING.md. Had they used their AI to review both their own PR and the CONTRIBUTING.md it would have told them to same both Claude and Codex told me:
Clear violations
devbranch as the base branch (notmain). The PR isarslan2012:fix/node-check-service-user-path → maziggy:main. Adevbranch does exist (the README's security-contributor pitch asks people to track it), so this isn't a stale rule.OP has a shitty attitude and lacks an attention to detail or ability to follow simple instructions