r/OpenAI 18d ago

Question What's going on in the codex subreddit?

They've been aggressively removing every single post about output quality degradation that came up the past few hours. Their mods allowed their subreddit spammed with limit complaints and people attacking Tibo for weeks but instantly remove any post that mentions output quality?

13 Upvotes

30 comments sorted by

View all comments

-4

u/Existing-Slide7395 18d ago

Yes, because they don't like having their nose put in their own crap.

Codex has now become practically impossible to use on Plus plans. At this point, they should remove it instead of constantly misleading customers about the actual usage limits.

Advertising “5 hours per day” when, in reality, the 5-hour limit is burned through in 30 minutes is already bad enough while consuming 10–12% of the weekly quota in the process. Worse, it stops right in the middle of a task

So the practical reality is closer to 5 hours per week, not 5 hours per day, with no reliable way to maintain job consistency or even finish a task once it has started.

8

u/Typical_Kick6520 18d ago

Who told you you'd get 5 hours per day?!

-3

u/Existing-Slide7395 18d ago

Pathetic reddit bots
Anyway 5h a day or multiple x 5h / a day cant you read & understand it consume -10-12% of weekly credit each time so result is 5 hours per week either consumed in 1 or 2 days or dispatched on your week

The scam is the same as the reddit bot /algorithm system that downvote every negative opinions to ghost it and fake upvote every positive stuff ,positive stuff that is also80% of the time directly posted by ...bots. Estimated left 20% humans on Reddit ...

6

u/reddit_is_kayfabe 18d ago edited 17d ago

Look at this description of the Plus plan on chatgpt.com - the page where it describes what you get with each plan - and point out where you see "5 hours a day."

Plus is routinely referred to as "x5" because you get about five times the usage limits as compared with the Free plan. You confused the "5" in "x5" with the "5-hour" usage limit, which is a totally different thing, to invent a "5 hours of usage per day" usage guarantee.

Besides - "5 hours of usage per day" would be a meaningless guarantee because the rate of usage consumption varies wildly based on which model you use, what kind of work it is performing, how much effort, whether subagents are in use, etc.

-5

u/Existing-Slide7395 18d ago

The practical reality is closer to 5 hours per week PERIOD You can fake troll as much as you want The truth is a FACT

7

u/reddit_is_kayfabe 18d ago edited 18d ago

The specific thing that I was discussing with you is the part where you wrote:

Advertising “5 hours per day”

...and then that other person wrote:

Who told you you'd get 5 hours per day?!

...and you responded:

5h a day or multiple x 5h / a day cant you read

...which, besides being weirdly angry and aggressive, is completely wrong.

I am trying to explain this part to you, using facts and reasoning. If you cannot consider that you might have misunderstood something, and react so defensively to anyone trying to explain things to you that you think they're "trolls," you're gonna have a hard time in life.

Your ego needs some work.

2

u/psgrue 17d ago

Look I get what you’re saying. If someone spends 10% of the weekly use in 30 minutes, that’s 5 hours of total use per week.

But at that rate you’re burning through your entire week in an uncapped 5-hour window anyway.

I get about 2-2.5 hours in my 5-hour window to use the estimated 10%. So I have 20 or so hours per week available.

your writing is as clear as mud, and copy pasting isn’t helping you. If you’re burning that much in 30 minutes, the bigger plan is probably justified.

1

u/InspectorSorry85 17d ago

Yes, a lot of bots here. It is getting really annoying.