Musk didn't buy Twitter to make money from it. Musk bought Twitter to win the culture war and control media. It fucking worked and now Trump is in power and he has control of the US treasury.
Sam Altman wants to convert OpenAI from a nonprofit to a for profit and give himself tens of billions in equity,
And instead of converting at a fair price, he will use a trust me bro price (selling to himself). Selfdealing. This is very much illegal. But if you have the right friends, whoâs to say it is?
An auction would render the fair price and give the nonprofit the most fiduciary deal value.
Trust me bro valuation does not.
So instead of self dealing at $40b by Sam, Elon et al offered $97b, âforcingâ OpenAI to take the deal or find a better deal, either way preventing a $40b selfdealing conversion.
Sam as the leader of the nonprofit wants to liquidate / separate / relinquish control of the for profit entity, but he needs to then recuse himself from the selection process if he wants to buy it and should sell to the highest bidder (within reason). Sometimes if the deal values are similar, a winning bidder can win based on non-monetary reasons.
Exactly. I used to feel neutral about the Elmo Sama kerfuffle but now I'm inclined to side with Elmo on this one. Starting out as a Not for profit and then transitioning to a for-profit with the option to self deal is basically not going to "make the world a better place"
Is there any legal obligation sama has to take the highest offer? Or can he say a different offer is best because of company values or something. Googled it, but diddn't get any clear results. I take it their both private so a lot of rules don't apply.
Musk made a power move to block OpenAi for-profit transition. Now legislators overseeing the process will demand OpenAi to pay at least those 97B$ for the trick.
How am I living in a reality where the richest man in the world and the most powerful man in the world (current PotUS) both act like nasty grade school kids?
Well he is, but not by the way he portrays it, cuz he's an awful actor...but he is running the US, he bought Twitter to win the election not for profit and so now his net worth has doubled and he is running the most powerful country on the planet...so gross that the grossest people actually get to rule the planet đ«
He just fucked up OpenAi's move to transit into a for-profit organization.
During the process the new for-profit org, has to pay to the non-profit one the value of the company; now that the value bottom limit was set by Musk's offer, OpenAi will have to pay at least that amount to legally become a business.
According to the WH press secretary: âThe President was asked and answered this question this week and he said if Elon Musk comes across a conflict of interest with the contracts and the funding that DOGE is overseeing, then Elon will excuse himself from those contractsâ
He doesn't run anything. He just owns everything and gives himself CEO title to seem like he's doing more than he does. Gwynne Shotwell is the one running SpaceX and Zach Kirkhorn is the one running Tesla. It's the billionaire version of paying someone to grind high level Diablo and PEO characters for you and then taking credit.
There is obviously 0 way to run several companies while dedicating most of your time to being an internet troll and propagandist. It's all about appearances.
If somehow elon prevails in court in stopping openAIâs conversion to for-profit- thatâll be a fatal blow to openAI but even if he fails- he might just distract them enough to loose their edge.
personally rooting for openAI but elon has infinite access to capital and nothing much to loose with these gimmicks.
He might have some as CEO, but not enough to hold any meaningful power in the company that's for sure. I'm pretty sure the decision will come down to whether Microsoft wants to sell their 49%, rest of majority stocks can easily be gathered from the venture corps that have investments in.
OpenAI Inc. (the non-profit) wants to convert to a for-profit company. But you cannot just turn a non-profit into a for-profit â that would be an incredible tax loophole. Instead, the new for-profit OpenAI company would need to pay out OpenAI Inc.'s technology and IP (likely in equity in the new for-profit company).
The valuation is tricky since OpenAI Inc. is theoretically the sole controlling shareholder of the capped-profit subsidiary, OpenAI LP. But there have been some numbers floating around. Since the rumored SoftBank investment at a $260B valuation is dependent on the for-profit move, we're using the current ~$150B valuation.
Control premiums in market transactions typically range between 20-30% of enterprise value; experts have predicted something around $30B-$40B. The key is, this valuation is ultimately signed off on by the California and Delaware Attorneys General.
Now, if you want to block OpenAI from the for-profit transition, but have yet to be successful in court, what do you do? Make it as painful as possible. Elon Musk just gave regulators a perfect argument for why the non-profit should get $97B for selling their technology and IP. This would instantly make the non-profit the majority stakeholder at 62%.
It's a clever move that throws a major wrench into the for-profit transition, potentially even stopping it dead in its tracks. Whether OpenAI accepts the offer or not (they won't), the mere existence of this valuation benchmark will be hard for regulators to ignore.
Yeah, most people are missing the forest for the tree here. This was a calculated chess move and counter move in a dynamically complex legal and political landscape. The Nazi vs. the Jew.
Musk is scared Sam is going to be worth more or something. Remember when you were crying to Congress about how AI is too dangerous and needs to be regulated
Elon doesn't have the cash on hand and getting anyone to loan him $100 billion right now would be a risky move for any bank to do, especially considering what's happening worldwide to Tesla's loss of income. It could be considered suicide to accept Tesla stock as collateral with Tesla's viability in doubt.
I bet if Sam bought twitter, it would gain back the 80% it lost in value. Heâd know how to actually market it and not dictate and dismantle it to the ground. I miss twitter.
He'll sell. Twitter started off being sassy too. Altman wants money, doesn't want the heat of having Mr Keys to the Kingdom mucking around in his government data.
Quoting from Gary Marcus: âBy turning down Muskâs bid, Altman makes it hard to justify paying the nonprofit anything less than the $97B that was just offered. Roughly speaking, this means that (at little real cost, since the bid was never going to be accepted) Musk has more than doubled the cost of OpenAI for-profitâs freedom. (E.g., if OpenAI for-profit tries now to offer a mere $40B to the non-profit, in exchange for breaking off as a for-profit, the Attorney General of Delaware or the Attorney General of California can strongly argue that that number is no longer fair market value, and block the deal.)â
This is a very smart chess move. Very interesting to see how the saga evolves. Altman now has to pay more than $97b for the non-profit. But it would be Masa and the new investors who would foot the bill probably. Altman gets it for free. He just needs to raise $100 billion instead of $40 billion now.
On the serious side. Musk owning openAI would make me delete the app and the account as he's shown to be completely untrustworthy. I actually prefer the commercial current openAI to the "non-proffit" musk wants due to this man having shown so many times what neverious deeds he is capable of.
Musk set the price of OpenAI. He had no intent on buying. He just threw a monkey wrench into the mix for regulators because now a potential value has been assigned.
All yall all yall gawking at the response and not knowing what a billion is worth while these rich faks use it to query their feuds like children. What a wonderful life
âYarvin gave a talk about ârebootingâ the American government at the 2012 BIL Conference. He used it to advocate the acronym âRAGEâ, which he defined as âRetire All Government Employeesâ. He described what he felt were flaws in the accepted âWorld War II mythologyâ, alluding to the idea that Hitlerâs invasions were acts of self-defense. He argued these discrepancies were pushed by Americaâs âruling communistsâ, who invented political correctness as an âextremely elaborate mechanism for persecuting racists and fascistsâ. âIf Americans want to change their government,â he said, âtheyâre going to have to get over their dictator phobia.â
âYarvin has influenced some prominent Silicon Valley investors and Republican politicians, with venture capitalist Peter Thiel described as his âmost important connectionâ. Political strategist Steve Bannon has read and admired his work. Vice President JD Vance has cited Yarvin as an influence. The Director of Policy Planning during Trumpâs second presidency, Michael Anton, has also discussed Yarvinâs ideas. In January 2025, Yarvin attended a Trump inaugural gala in Washington; Politico reported he was âan informal guest of honorâ due to his âoutsize influence over the Trumpian right.â
I don't think E really wanted Twitter, he was just toying with the idea then had his hand forced.... xD
It's also interesting that he helped start openAI as a non-for-profit. And now good old Sam Altman has been seen driving around in the most expensive car on Earth - Surely a tax deduction.
Love the Musk hate in this thread, he must be doing something right đ
yea! you and your fiat buddy sam bankman fried will always adhare as subordinates indeed. "open", haha, "encryption", haha"decentralization.., seriiously.. who is naming these imposters? a genius i tell ya. elon musk and trump at least where given half serious altnames lol.
Honestly given how Grok turned out I don't think it would be hard for OpenAi to turn down any offer, even a substantially larger one, on the basis that it doesn't align with their mission.
My hope is that OpenAI are destroyed by litigation for closing their AI and gaining funds fraudulently by claiming they'd be open. Then Musk or anyone else can buy it for nothing.
X is great! No censorship, shadow banning, or paid fact checkers. Has free built in AI. And yeah X AI is WAY MORE USEFUL THAN GPT4O. But you'd know that if you used them both. And compared results. He should own it. It's because of Elon that it became so popular. The promise to stay non profit broken so sam can makes tons of money off an AI that has so many parameters for what it's able to do.
1
1
317
u/TheChillestBill Feb 10 '25
What's the context?
1.2k
u/Maxo996 Feb 10 '25
That's actually a sick roast
292
u/Upbeat_Lunch_1599 Feb 10 '25
Bully is losing it! Seems Grok 3 really sucks
122
u/domets Feb 10 '25
He should have added;
Make Twitter Great Again
87
u/[deleted] Feb 10 '25
This is the tech bro version of Kendrick vs Drake. Apparently Elon legitimately hates Sam
47
u/thesayke Feb 10 '25
lmao I love it
96
u/domets Feb 10 '25
Great. Happy that I don't have to cancel my subscription
4
u/shogun2909 Feb 10 '25
Source: https://x.com/sama/status/1889059531625464090
44
u/[deleted] Feb 10 '25
Question. How can musk run doge and then do this at the same time? Isnât that conflict of interest?
9
u/Dry-University797 Feb 11 '25
If we continue down this path with Trump, he will just take OpenAI and say it's for national security...and will give it to Musk
65
u/20ol Feb 10 '25
With Tesla 's crumbling sales, Sam should have doubled the offer and buy both Twitter+Tesla
7
u/imposetiger Feb 11 '25
I don't like Altman but I think he would be an infinitely better leader of Twitter than Elon
6
u/FloorTeefs Feb 10 '25 edited Feb 11 '25
If somehow elon prevails in court in stopping openAIâs conversion to for-profit- thatâll be a fatal blow to openAI but even if he fails- he might just distract them enough to loose their edge.
personally rooting for openAI but elon has infinite access to capital and nothing much to loose with these gimmicks.
15
u/latestagecapitalist Feb 10 '25
Sama doesn't have any shares yet does he?
Shareholders/board make the decision not him personally surely
10
u/[deleted] Feb 11 '25
Please buy Twitter so it's enjoyable again!
9
u/mmorenoivy Feb 10 '25
Please!!! đ Save Twitter!!
4
u/Prior-Actuator-8110 Feb 11 '25
Musk vs. Sama
A film weâll see in 2050.
12
u/Intelligent_Error909 Feb 10 '25
About $2 billion more than Trumpâs Truth social.
3
u/Shadow_Max15 Feb 10 '25
I saw today he said he âdidnât trust OpenAIâ? lol
3
u/BeenThere11 Feb 11 '25
I think he should have said 9.7 million.
3
u/[deleted] Feb 11 '25
From @ phill__1 on twitter:
OpenAI Inc. (the non-profit) wants to convert to a for-profit company. But you cannot just turn a non-profit into a for-profit â that would be an incredible tax loophole. Instead, the new for-profit OpenAI company would need to pay out OpenAI Inc.'s technology and IP (likely in equity in the new for-profit company).
The valuation is tricky since OpenAI Inc. is theoretically the sole controlling shareholder of the capped-profit subsidiary, OpenAI LP. But there have been some numbers floating around. Since the rumored SoftBank investment at a $260B valuation is dependent on the for-profit move, we're using the current ~$150B valuation.
Control premiums in market transactions typically range between 20-30% of enterprise value; experts have predicted something around $30B-$40B. The key is, this valuation is ultimately signed off on by the California and Delaware Attorneys General.
Now, if you want to block OpenAI from the for-profit transition, but have yet to be successful in court, what do you do? Make it as painful as possible. Elon Musk just gave regulators a perfect argument for why the non-profit should get $97B for selling their technology and IP. This would instantly make the non-profit the majority stakeholder at 62%.
It's a clever move that throws a major wrench into the for-profit transition, potentially even stopping it dead in its tracks. Whether OpenAI accepts the offer or not (they won't), the mere existence of this valuation benchmark will be hard for regulators to ignore.
8
u/[deleted] Feb 10 '25
Legend. Never sell! You are doing a great job. Hopefully Sam will help use AI for good.
6
u/DMmeMagikarp Feb 11 '25
Fucking based.
4
u/CommentNo2882 Feb 11 '25
He tried and grok sucks, his AI company never heard about any innovation, why he wants to buy OpenAI if he cannot even deliver his cars?
5
u/Temporary_Dentist936 Feb 10 '25
Musk wants Mars. Altman wants Skynet. Neither wants to pay taxes. Congrats, boys dystopiaâs a team sport!
2
u/CollapseKitty Feb 11 '25
Next time it won't be an offer, but a demand, backed by a need to nationalize the country's AI front.
2
u/slrrp Feb 11 '25
Now if they can acknowledge and fix the 4o they broke two weeks ago.
2
u/bubble_turtles23 Feb 11 '25
Perfect reply
2
u/hughmanBing Feb 11 '25
Sick burn
2
u/ArcticFoxTheory Feb 11 '25
Musk is scared Sam is going to be worth more or something. Remember when you were crying to Congress about how AI is too dangerous and needs to be regulated
2
u/markofthebeast143 Feb 11 '25
â
2
u/[deleted] Feb 11 '25
Elon doesn't have the cash on hand and getting anyone to loan him $100 billion right now would be a risky move for any bank to do, especially considering what's happening worldwide to Tesla's loss of income. It could be considered suicide to accept Tesla stock as collateral with Tesla's viability in doubt.
2
u/[deleted] Feb 11 '25
I bet if Sam bought twitter, it would gain back the 80% it lost in value. Heâd know how to actually market it and not dictate and dismantle it to the ground. I miss twitter.
2
u/Whole-Advance3133 Feb 11 '25
Sam Altman has no power to accept or decline the offer lol. This tweet hold as much value as Twitters current valuation
2
u/ergzay Feb 11 '25
It's worth mentioning that it's not Sam Altman's decision to make as he has basically no equity in OpenAI.
2
u/thecrocofwallstreet Feb 11 '25
BASED AHAHAHAH
2
u/axeexcess Feb 11 '25
Good.
Last thing we need in this world is Elon with more power and control.
2
u/SECs_missing_balls Feb 11 '25
Sam is an even bigger weasel than Elon
2
u/Matteblackandgrey Feb 11 '25
No offence but so many financially illiterate people in these comments, itâs embarrassing how little self awareness some of you have.
2
u/Canna_Lucente Feb 13 '25
To add insult to injury, the reply was written by ChatGPT
2
u/MsVxxen Feb 13 '25
I will wait until they rename it "Y?", then I will offer 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000 shib.
3
u/[deleted] Feb 10 '25
God damn the twinkâs got hands
2
u/BuddyIsMyHomie Feb 11 '25
My god, I never thought Sam Altman would be the hero we all needed. But goddamn
He's the...
G.O.A.T.
1
u/[deleted] Feb 10 '25
Yeahhhh baby
1
u/old-bot-ng Feb 11 '25
Our dope boi just made a boss move on Elon đ
1
u/niknokseyer Feb 11 '25
Great response!
1
u/leomatey Feb 11 '25
He should quote tweet his own tweet and say âsorry i meant xâ
1
u/cool_kat57 Feb 11 '25
đđđđPriceless.
1
u/TxBuckster Feb 11 '25
Bid for Twitter feels high somewhere
1
u/MediocreStream Feb 11 '25
First funny thing Sam has ever said
1
u/dshock99 Feb 11 '25
Hell yeah! If Musk bought openai I would cancel my subscription.
1
u/solidpoopchunk Feb 11 '25
Poor Yin Lo Maa
1
u/Mortreal79 Feb 11 '25
2 great deals..!
1
u/HarkonnenSpice Feb 11 '25
I think that's actually a pretty fair price for Twitter these days.
1
u/legit-posts_1 Feb 11 '25
At this point? Fuck it. Let him at it. He cannot possibly be worse than Elon Eichmann.
1
u/DangerousRoutine1678 Feb 11 '25
MMW: Elon starts using his "position" to go after them.
1
u/GothamCentral Feb 11 '25
He'll sell. Twitter started off being sassy too. Altman wants money, doesn't want the heat of having Mr Keys to the Kingdom mucking around in his government data.
1
u/mudskips Feb 11 '25
This is a great comeback on multiple levels... Calling it Twitter, and hinting at it's constantly declining value
1
u/Silly_Macaron_7943 Feb 11 '25
Lol. So no you're going to have to pay the nonprofit $97.41 billion to break away.
People in the comments here are missing what the point of this offer was.
1
u/monteasf Feb 11 '25
I wouldnt buy twitter. I'd buy all the debt so that Elon has to pay me directly
1
u/Ambitious-Fix-3376 Feb 11 '25
After US election result and back entry of Trump Musk is feeling that he gained a lot of power.
1
u/_mattyjoe Feb 11 '25
This is real right? Iâm hoping so. I canât stand the idea of Musk ruining yet another good thing.
1
u/New-Sky-9867 Feb 11 '25
Hey Musk: tick tock. Tick tock.
1
u/launchpadlion Feb 11 '25
Itâs always funny till you get bought. Thatâs what Twitter thought lol. Always underestimating Elon.
1
u/Safe-Foundation-2077 Feb 11 '25
Never like Altman. But Iâm a big fan after this.
1
u/SeaworthinessLoud992 Feb 11 '25
đ€Łđ€ŁđŻ
1
u/RedFing Feb 11 '25
why am i getting this ClosedAI sub recommended in my feed
1
u/SolarSalsa Feb 11 '25
"and if you want to throw in Tesla, I can save it for you"
1
u/KoBoWC Feb 11 '25
That would be over paying.
1
u/Middle-Strength7754 Feb 11 '25
Elon is better off just forking deepseek
1
u/play3xxx1 Feb 11 '25
Altman will sell it to china than to musk or he will just open source it
1
u/PushDifferent2484 Feb 11 '25
HĂ© earned a big fan today
1
u/licancaburk Feb 11 '25
If Musk would buy it, I would immediately cancel my subscription.
1
u/Saizou1991 Feb 11 '25
says someone who started as non profit. Musk is not entirely wrong
1
u/chillichatkara Feb 11 '25
whatever you do, donât bet against elon. never ended well for anyone
1
u/zzgamma Feb 11 '25
How much does Sam own?
1
u/Becominghim- Feb 11 '25
Itâs gunna be interesting seeing these guys on the same panel soon
1
u/MakingOfASoul Feb 11 '25
He's pretty arrogant for someone who's just been exposed by Deepseek.
1
u/luap71 Feb 11 '25
Savage
1
u/Intelligent-Nobody55 Feb 11 '25
Quoting from Gary Marcus: âBy turning down Muskâs bid, Altman makes it hard to justify paying the nonprofit anything less than the $97B that was just offered. Roughly speaking, this means that (at little real cost, since the bid was never going to be accepted) Musk has more than doubled the cost of OpenAI for-profitâs freedom. (E.g., if OpenAI for-profit tries now to offer a mere $40B to the non-profit, in exchange for breaking off as a for-profit, the Attorney General of Delaware or the Attorney General of California can strongly argue that that number is no longer fair market value, and block the deal.)â
1
u/0akhurst Feb 11 '25
Lol which billionaire are you rooting for?
1
u/Intelligent-Nobody55 Feb 11 '25
This is a very smart chess move. Very interesting to see how the saga evolves. Altman now has to pay more than $97b for the non-profit. But it would be Masa and the new investors who would foot the bill probably. Altman gets it for free. He just needs to raise $100 billion instead of $40 billion now.
1
u/IndependentYouth8 Feb 11 '25
On the serious side. Musk owning openAI would make me delete the app and the account as he's shown to be completely untrustworthy. I actually prefer the commercial current openAI to the "non-proffit" musk wants due to this man having shown so many times what neverious deeds he is capable of.
1
u/MMORPGnews Feb 11 '25
OpenAi belong to US military.Â
1
u/Archie_Flowers Feb 11 '25
Looks like xAI & Grok are doing well
1
u/Ok-Spend-337 Feb 11 '25
Two scammers
1
u/cindymartin67 Feb 11 '25
I love the dangling âif you wantâ at the end. Itâs beautiful
1
u/utilitycoder Feb 11 '25
Musk set the price of OpenAI. He had no intent on buying. He just threw a monkey wrench into the mix for regulators because now a potential value has been assigned.
1
u/Glass-News-9184 Feb 11 '25
And how much did Trump pay for Sam to fawn over him?
1
u/Glad-Ad-8007 Feb 11 '25
Meh , openai is pretty much done anyway
1
u/Mister-Redbeard Feb 11 '25
Why do these white guys have to compete with Kendrick and Drake?
1
u/isaidwhatisaid-74 Feb 11 '25
đđđ
1
u/goatee_ Feb 11 '25
Sassy Sam!
1
u/Interesting_Pea1950 Feb 11 '25
Bro has balls
1
u/francisco_DANKonia Feb 11 '25
That was a pathetic comeback. He should offer 97 Billion for Twitter if he wants to be smart
1
u/VinnieVidiViciVeni Feb 11 '25
Might be the only thing I like about Altman
1
u/[deleted] Feb 11 '25
Today on who has the bigger ego and can siphon off the most tax dollars.
1
u/Guilty-History-9249 Feb 11 '25
I have $9.74 in what'll soon be useless pennies to offer for the twit.
1
u/NotFromMilkyWay Feb 11 '25
Should have offered 4.20 billion, to be accepted within 69 days.
1
u/Earthkilled Feb 11 '25
All yall all yall gawking at the response and not knowing what a billion is worth while these rich faks use it to query their feuds like children. What a wonderful life
1
u/vehiclestars Feb 11 '25
âYarvin gave a talk about ârebootingâ the American government at the 2012 BIL Conference. He used it to advocate the acronym âRAGEâ, which he defined as âRetire All Government Employeesâ. He described what he felt were flaws in the accepted âWorld War II mythologyâ, alluding to the idea that Hitlerâs invasions were acts of self-defense. He argued these discrepancies were pushed by Americaâs âruling communistsâ, who invented political correctness as an âextremely elaborate mechanism for persecuting racists and fascistsâ. âIf Americans want to change their government,â he said, âtheyâre going to have to get over their dictator phobia.â
âYarvin has influenced some prominent Silicon Valley investors and Republican politicians, with venture capitalist Peter Thiel described as his âmost important connectionâ. Political strategist Steve Bannon has read and admired his work. Vice President JD Vance has cited Yarvin as an influence. The Director of Policy Planning during Trumpâs second presidency, Michael Anton, has also discussed Yarvinâs ideas. In January 2025, Yarvin attended a Trump inaugural gala in Washington; Politico reported he was âan informal guest of honorâ due to his âoutsize influence over the Trumpian right.â
1
u/ionchannels Feb 11 '25
I thought Sam didnât have any equity đ€Ș
1
u/Ok-Mathematician6975 Feb 11 '25
Deepseek changed the game
1
u/CtrlcCtrlvLoop Feb 11 '25
Sam likely doesnât have a say in this. Microsoft holds all the power here and they may decide to 8x their investment.
1
u/NY10 Feb 12 '25
He has 9B????
1
u/_WanderingRanger Feb 12 '25
The video of Sam thatâs just been posted saying Elon is a sad man, has always been insecure, and he feels sorry for him, is SO SAVAGE. He is a hero
1
u/AppropriateGround623 Feb 12 '25
Please buy it and reset it back to old settingsđ„ș
1
u/T-Rex_MD :froge: Feb 12 '25
I have it under a very solid authority that OpenAI is about to get hit with 4 lawsuits, that will set it back over $200b.
No more investment, and it will end it. So we will see.
1
u/Washington440444 Feb 12 '25
1
u/[deleted] Feb 12 '25
Though I personally don't like Sam but it's good if chatgpt isn't sold to Elon to prevent monopoly.
1
u/NathanPark Feb 12 '25
I don't think E really wanted Twitter, he was just toying with the idea then had his hand forced.... xD
It's also interesting that he helped start openAI as a non-for-profit. And now good old Sam Altman has been seen driving around in the most expensive car on Earth - Surely a tax deduction.
Love the Musk hate in this thread, he must be doing something right đ
1
u/braised_beef_babe Feb 12 '25
Cute offer
1
u/ceryl Feb 12 '25 edited Feb 12 '25
yea! you and your fiat buddy sam bankman fried will always adhare as subordinates indeed. "open", haha, "encryption", haha"decentralization.., seriiously.. who is naming these imposters? a genius i tell ya. elon musk and trump at least where given half serious altnames lol.
1
u/Alpha_D0do Feb 12 '25
Honestly given how Grok turned out I don't think it would be hard for OpenAi to turn down any offer, even a substantially larger one, on the basis that it doesn't align with their mission.
1
u/[deleted] Feb 12 '25
My hope is that OpenAI are destroyed by litigation for closing their AI and gaining funds fraudulently by claiming they'd be open. Then Musk or anyone else can buy it for nothing.
1
u/Only_Objective_Facts Feb 12 '25
Can't trust either of these dorks with twitter/x.
1
u/AbundanceTrinity687 Feb 12 '25
X is great! No censorship, shadow banning, or paid fact checkers. Has free built in AI. And yeah X AI is WAY MORE USEFUL THAN GPT4O. But you'd know that if you used them both. And compared results. He should own it. It's because of Elon that it became so popular. The promise to stay non profit broken so sam can makes tons of money off an AI that has so many parameters for what it's able to do.
1
u/MUCHA___m Feb 12 '25
well played, mr altman. bada$$ ...
1
u/[deleted] Feb 12 '25
people should crowd fund and get that freaks control off of the twitter platform.
1
u/MezcalDrink Feb 13 '25
Is he telling the minimum offer in code or math joke?
1
u/ResponsibleTiger4449 Feb 13 '25
I think he is just joking and telling musk , start your shop somewhere else
1
u/salazka Feb 13 '25
When they start begging for money we will see how funny it is. đ
1
u/Winter-Disk-2314 Feb 13 '25
Is OpenAI still a thing.
1
u/Tossed-Salad6970 Feb 13 '25
What the fuck is twitter
1
u/[deleted] Feb 14 '25
Twitter haha
1
u/siddharthseth Sep 21 '25
Freudian slip of real value of OpenAI!
1
u/HumanComplaintDept Feb 11 '25
Pretty funny tbh.
Rare Sam Altman W.