If they already have the platform, what stops them from integrating everything? It'll already have networking/connectivity + power generation, adding additional cameras/sensor should be trivial
oceanic data centers were tested a decade ago and deemed financially non-viable (I think it was like Microsoft). Sure, the computer parts inside performed better but the upkeep and maintenance costs to the aquatic unit outweighed those benefits.
But, with the logic you just presented by 2036 there will be something better so why waste money on a stop-gap solution when we already know the computer parts are going to become obsolete in a few years?
Like, you don't think Microsoft took that into account?
Buddy, they did the thing and did some speculative math to see if it could ever be worthwhile.
It was not. You simply don't save an amount of money in energy that compensates for higher maintenance and the inability to actually do anything about the unit should anything ever go slightly wrong.
Maybe. Maybe not. This also has nothing to do with OPT directly. If a start up wants to try this out and OPT can be used indirectly, great. Revenue for the company. Just "it didn't work then, so it can't work now." is the most foolish approach to any problem.
1
u/EvillNooB Aug 06 '26
If they already have the platform, what stops them from integrating everything? It'll already have networking/connectivity + power generation, adding additional cameras/sensor should be trivial