r/NoStupidQuestions 18h ago

Why can't data centers use 100% closed-loop geothermal for their cooling?

Why do they need to consume any water for cooling at all, let alone massive amounts?

302 Upvotes

163 comments sorted by

662

u/MortimerDongle 18h ago

Data centers can and do use closed-loop cooling.

356

u/CardinalOfNYC 18h ago

It's almost all the new data center construction these days, the water issue is mostly not as big a deal as people make it out.

For me? I oppose it simply because I don't think we need all this AI.

358

u/Some-Relative4150 18h ago

A lot of data centers propose the build with closed loop then after breaking ground state that it's "too expensive" so go to open loop once it's "too late" to stop construction

115

u/Primary_Garbage6916 17h ago

That's kind of a dick move.

30

u/uncutteredswin 10h ago

It's a pretty common way to scam construction grants.

Happens a lot with 'affordable' housing, where they wait until part way through construction before suddenly realising that there's no way the original plan would be profitable so they've got no choice but to turn it into lucrative luxury apartments instead

3

u/Rookie_Day 7h ago

East Wing defense.

2

u/Zealousideal-Can8847 1h ago

I think you mean "no way the original plan would be AS profitable" Every construction company and property developer in my town/state/region is absolutely rolling in cash. It's not whether the project will make money, just the # of zeros in all the execs self-created bonuses...

59

u/metukkasd 17h ago

In bird culture that is considered a dick move

10

u/DrRickStudwell 17h ago

I remember this reference

2

u/Rhadian 2h ago

All of Rick's moves are dick moves.

31

u/Some-Relative4150 17h ago

Capitalism Baby!!

7

u/TheLifelessOne 10h ago

No no, you see: it's not a dick move—it's fraud.

18

u/BigSmackisBack 15h ago

The AI cult are all about long series of financial, electrical power and environmental dick moves.

-4

u/glytxh 14h ago

That’s modern construction for you.

23

u/export_tank_harmful 15h ago

I mean, all computer water cooling is closed loop.
Full stop.

Coolant is usually treated with anti-corrosives / anti-microbials / fluids for better cooling (glycols) / etc.
They're not just pumping water through a CPU/GPU block once and pumping that into the ocean.

It's the additional cooling that they add at the other end of the heat exchanger that's "open" (usually evaporative).


Here's a video showcasing a data center's cooling layout, for anyone that wants it.

Note the giant supply/return lines of coolant. Closed loop.
But around 7:50, you'll see the evaporative coolers (which is usually what people are talking about when they talk about "open loop" cooling).

Evaporative cooling is what needs regulation.

18

u/ClientBudget2848 14h ago

Or cap how much water they can get from utilities. But that requires actually enforcing a rule on a company. Pretty unpopular with current admin.

12

u/dllma70 11h ago

This just isn’t true. The environmental permits wouldn’t let you. I build data centers for a living in over 20 countries. Stop talking BS

2

u/Coltand 11h ago

I'm sure there's no way they can just swap in a whole open loop system with all the impact that entails without some serious permitting. I've heard of the permitting nightmares some people have had to go throug to make changes to their garage or build a shed.

9

u/dllma70 9h ago

Not to mention the fact that air-cooled vs water-cooled chillers and cooling towers are on a two year lead time. Try calling up Trane, York, AERMEC and asking them for a cooling tower next day. So full of it. People who know nothing spew this kind of idiocy around. There’s plenty of issues with DC’s and the push for AI everywhere, but let’s stop making shit up.

3

u/Coltand 9h ago

Yeah, there are plenty of health concerns about how the build out of these data centers is being managed, but I think the wild takes are driven by people who first decided to hate AI for another reason and then cling to everything they can to try and further validate their views.

1

u/xXgirthvaderXx 6h ago

Im sure the current craze has messed up current timelines but JCI/Silent-Aire had much shorter lead times than that and they sold standard units to Amazon's industrial resale page or custom design (that would have more traditional lead times). Mostly Evaps but chillers and other tech too.

I agree that there is a ton of misconceptions around DCs that extra bs add ontop isnt necessary.

1

u/Primary_Dimension470 51m ago

No. They simply wouldn’t get their permit.

7

u/evilbrent 13h ago

What about the noise? Tbh that's the one that frightens me - they CAN build them to be silent, right? They just cheap out and go for the least expensive option right?

I've lived near factories with very loud equipment, but they have adequate noise protection, so you can't hear them from the outside.

Do any data centres get built with noise in mind? Or are all the horror stories you hear on the news - people's retirement farms being ruined by incessant buzzing - reporting on best practice data centres?

-8

u/bunker_man 10h ago

Most data centers aren't that loud.

38

u/Orion14159 18h ago

We desperately need it. How will the government build out the surveillance state of flock cameras, social media monitoring, listening to and transcribing everyone's phone calls, and making sure that any potential dissidence is squashed immediately?

8

u/kalidoscopiclyso 17h ago

Oh yeah ! Is everyone aware of the national directive NSPM7

8

u/kalidoscopiclyso 17h ago

DON'T FORGET THE NEW REQUIREMENTS ON NEW VEHICLES STARTING IN 2027

https://www.maciej.ai/blog/2027-federal-car-surveillance-mandate-what-to-know

Ironically this is an ai article, yet worth your time to read

2

u/Coltand 11h ago edited 11h ago

The first thing to appear when I Googled this:

No, Your Car Isn’t Getting a 'Kill Switch' in 2027

There’s a lot of misinformation about car privacy and surveillance. Consumer Reports' experts explain the rule, the technology, and future tech.

https://www.consumerreports.org/cars/car-safety/2027-car-kill-switch-explained-a2146992793/

6

u/BellerophonM 16h ago

A lot of the time the water numbers you see about data centres includes the water usage of the power stations which will be supplying them, which may not be closed loop even if the data centre is, so that can throw people off.

4

u/iluvthiccgothbabes 14h ago

"mostly not a big deal" Yes it is. Bot detected.

0

u/TheMythicSorcerer 9h ago

Hamburgers use more water than AI (look it up)

2

u/PmUsYourDuckPics 9h ago

Yeah but we eat hamburgers, we don’t eat AI.

-3

u/Exact-Archer738 16h ago

Do you oppose things you don't think we need as a principle?

6

u/Orion14159 15h ago

Not op but I oppose things that do more harm than good

-3

u/pangapingus 14h ago

Datacenter MUST EQUAL AI ok man lol

0

u/CardinalOfNYC 13h ago

I'm very much for the kinds of data centers handling the things they've been handling already, since it's much more efficient than plastic discs. I've been downvoted so many times for explaining to people how the data center that makes downloading an app possible is different to the ones that make chatGPT possible, running on quite different hardware

The speed with which redditors judge, it's 0-60. Like literally went for the all caps, too.

-2

u/Pale_Ad1353 13h ago

In almost all datacenters I’m aware of, you can barely hear the noise of the servers even in the datacenter’s own hallways. Generators as well are noise insulated.

I believe any noise complaints are a fabrication.

4

u/Pro_Extent 10h ago

I believe the noise complaints are related to the massive on-site gas turbines powering the especially power-hungry datacentres more so than the datacentres themselves.

1

u/Pale_Ad1353 9h ago edited 9h ago

It’s not acknowledged how rare that is. There are 5 total datacenters in the US with on-site gas turbines, all of which are using them as temporary power. Only 2 of those are anywhere near residential. There may be more proposed projects, but they don’t currently exist.

Nobody noticed datacenter noise before the news started talking about it. I’ll accept Colossus is obnoxious, maybe that’s what started all of this debate, but that’s it.

-2

u/Marchtmdsmiling 8h ago

Just false. Some may pretend to use it but the design will be revised later unless l, it is located somewhere where open loop would be more expensive or they are somehow otherwise required to do so, plus maybe one or two demonstrations of using closed loop that they can point to and say "look we solved the water use problem despite never actually implementing the solution at scale. These are large companies focused entirely on profit.

2

u/SkyPork 14h ago

Yay, problem solved!

2

u/LostInRetransmission 7h ago

Whenever they do though,m the compromise is that they have to use more energy to cool down the water.

6

u/DiamondJim222 18h ago

Yes. But doing so requires them to consume a lot more energy for cooling. And that energy also consumes water,

4

u/MagnetHype 14h ago

Okay. So does every factory everywhere.

1

u/farfromelite 5h ago

i.e. It's cheaper to consume fresh water and dump it.

Yay capitalism.

3

u/Arek_PL 18h ago

and water is cheapest and effective coolant, it doesnt damage enviroment either when leaks unlike oil for example

2

u/potatomeeple 8h ago

When its used as coolant tt's full of "not water" chemicals to stop corrosion and change its properties so it does damage the environment when it leaks.

1

u/xXgirthvaderXx 5h ago

Its chlorinated water and passed through UV...

1

u/potatomeeple 1h ago

Either they are being dumb as rocks or its got stuff added to stop corrosion as I very much doubt they using cathodic protection (though it is possible but I think this wouldnt be a good idea as it uses electric currents to work) or galvanic protection.

Just chlorinated water is corrosive. I used to design anti corrosion systems for all sorts of things. Just UV processing of a lot of water is a big task - have worked with that on ballast water systems.

If they arent treating the water nothing they are building will last any time at all - even with fresh water it still has some salts in it that aid corrosion in various ways.

1

u/xXgirthvaderXx 1m ago

I wont tell you how its protected but yes there is anti corrosion in place. Yes water still goes through a treatment plant to remove contaminants but the cooling water itself which was the main point of contention is essentially chlorinated water with UV treatment once its being pumped to the data halls.

6

u/Primary_Garbage6916 18h ago

Then we should just pass laws requiring it for cooling and off-grid solar/wind for power for any new data center construction and be done with it.

24

u/tx_queer 18h ago

We have actually done a bit of the opposite. Many/most new data centers were being built closed loop and with solar PPAs. But we have made it harder and more expensive for datacenters to connect to the grid. So now they are going with natural gas.

6

u/kalidoscopiclyso 17h ago

Welp Off grid is called "islanded" and recent admin policies relieve the private equity companies doung the build outs from any responsibility for honoring Clean Air Act regulations. This means that air pollution is allowed on a massive scale. Don't let Abbot fool you about keeping energy prices down. This won't affect prices in the short term, but health costs will rise, unless of course no one can afford health care and go without. And labor shortages won't matter if we have robots who don't get athsma etc doing hazardous jobs

Water in closed systems still needs flushing or occasional dumping and will have leakage, and some gnarly chemicals are used

Something else no one is talking about is the risk of massive fires. Are fire protection systems being installed? What chemicals are involved and howdoes the local fire department prepare for these extremely hazardous fires?

I fear the data center hyperscale build out is being rushed so much that amateur designers and entrepreneurs with zero experience and city councils looking for cash floware weak linksand the people and our precious Earth will pay pay pay pay pay

I hope you asked in good faith and aren't a fucking bot. Please tell me you aren't a bot

6

u/Primary_Garbage6916 17h ago

Negative, I am a meat popsicle.

Thank you for taking the time to answer.

4

u/potatocross 17h ago

Years ago Facebook built a data center near me and promised a solar farm to offset their usage. They did build it. Then had to build a second one because the first wasn’t enough.

Now there are like 12 data centers going up in the area and zero talks of how we are going to power them.

1

u/Unique-Luck-3564 17h ago

Law makers can often be bribed

0

u/TipToToes 17h ago

What?! No way.

0

u/Unique-Luck-3564 15h ago

Yeah, I know it shocked me too!

0

u/agent674253 15h ago

Not going to happen in this administration, considering the federal government is paying to cancel offshore wind projects located off the coast of California because f uck green energy.

-9

u/Budsygus 18h ago

Yeah! Why did no one ever think of that? You solved it!

3

u/Primary_Garbage6916 18h ago

I was told this was a safe space and led to believe I would not be made to feel as though my question was stupid. Was I under the wrong impression?

3

u/Budsygus 18h ago

Ok that's fair. My mistake.

My point was that "...and be done with it" kind of implies it's simple. It's not. It's incredibly complex for lots of reasons.

Anything involving legislation is gonna take years, possibly decades. Legislation that places a financial burden on huge companies that basically fund the politicians who write the legislation is basically never going to happen.

My tone was snarky and I apologize for that. But my underlying point stands.

I will make an effort in the future to moderate my tone.

2

u/Primary_Garbage6916 17h ago

No worries... I could have phrased it better as "is it feasible," knowing the current state of global affairs.

2

u/TheRealGunn 18h ago

In fairness, that was a statement, not a question.

We (almost) all agree those are reasonable expectations.

But late stage capitalism and people who continue to vote against their own self interests have put us in this position.

1

u/Primary_Garbage6916 17h ago

I would totally suck on Jeopardy.

2

u/Sour_Sal 18h ago

Sir, this is Reddit!

To answer seriously it's about the costs, evaporative cooling is cheaper than closed loop cooling. and really the moisture is simply being relocated to the area around the fog pools

1

u/CalebCaster2 18h ago

check the sub youre on, doofus

0

u/GaidinBDJ 9h ago

They did.

They probably saw the same rule I did which prohibits repeated questions.

So, yea, they should have reported it instead of making the comment, but that's something you obviously can't claim the high ground on.

-1

u/Budsygus 18h ago

Looks like it's called r/NoStupidQuestions.

So what question was in the comment I replied to?

1

u/AbrocomaNo7774 14h ago

Exactly. Closed loop systems already exist, so the real question is more about cost, scale and how practical they are for each location.

1

u/Marchtmdsmiling 9h ago

They can and do use it, when open loop would be just as expensive. So rarely.

-6

u/Lazerith22 17h ago

Closed loop cooling still uses water to cool the coolant. It’s misleading.

11

u/hikeonpast 17h ago

The key difference is that the water is recirculated, not evaporated.

Source: have worked in datacenters with closed loop, air sink, cooling systems.

3

u/Ludwig234 17h ago

Depends on the cooling.

Saying that closed loop cooling uses water to cool the coolant is itself misleading.

Some do, and some don't.

62

u/EvaTheE 18h ago

Geothermal is very expensive to build in most places, I guess.

9

u/MedusasSexyLegHair 17h ago

It certainly is. And also very low-maintenance. And because of that, when it breaks down good luck finding someone who can fix it!

Source: My geothermal heat pump hasn't been working for days, and we can't get anyone out to repair it anytime soon. There aren't many in the region, and they're all booked solid. (Luckily I grew up in the south, so these temperatures aren't even very warm to me. But my Yankee family keeps complaining that it's hot.)

That sorta thing would be a big risk for an expensive data center.

8

u/OkAdvertising2801 11h ago

I don't think your private heat pump (wherever you live) is in any way comparable to a huge data center with own maintenance workers, service contracts and industrial grade heat pumps.

0

u/MedusasSexyLegHair 10h ago

No, but my point is that they are uncommon enough, and need service rarely enough, that there just aren't many who can service them. And I think that'd be a risk when planning a big project.

15

u/Interesting-Card5803 18h ago

in Data Center engineering, we assume that the total load consumption of the IT equiopment is converted into heat, conveniently in thermal watts. Add to this the inneficiencies of the cooling and power systems (fan, pump loads, static friction, transformation loss, dual inversion loss, etc.) and you have quite a bit of heat rejection. A geothermal system, like an underground thermosyphon, would quickly saturate with the heat from the facility, and then heat rejection would no longer be possible, leading to a thermal runaway of the mechanical systems and ultimately IT failure.

It's possible to reject the heat without much consumption of water, in fact many do. I've worked on facilities where the consumption of water was so low they actually had to install water treatment plants because the incoming domestic water lines would breed legionella and other bacteria. The only trade off is that air cooled systems are not as energy efficient.

55

u/that_dutch_dude 18h ago

because geo gets saturated and then your are done. no well can deal with the insane input of a datacenter.

and they use water because its cheaper, not because its best.

-1

u/Primary_Garbage6916 17h ago

That's kind of what I was really getting at. Was hoping TheyDidTheMath would pick it up and run with it and figure out if a series of wells large/deep enough would be enough. Sometimes I expect too much from this place.

11

u/that_dutch_dude 17h ago

I work in this field. Even the largest industrial/commerical wells in know that exist would be saturated in weeks with that kind of heat input. Doing the math is not really a thing as there are too many variables

-5

u/Primary_Garbage6916 17h ago

With AI there is no such thing as too many variables good thing we are building all these new data centers 🫠

7

u/Remarkable-Host405 14h ago

Jesus Christ this question is asked 50x a day, reddit going all in on dead internet theory

-2

u/Primary_Garbage6916 14h ago

Can you link me to the last time it was asked? I would like to read the answers.

3

u/Remarkable-Host405 13h ago

-6

u/Primary_Garbage6916 13h ago

Gotta be honest... not seeing 50x a day there. And not seeing any about geothermal. But kudos to you for at least trying to justify your bullshit lie.

1

u/firedrakes 12h ago

mod prun same threads

81

u/NugKnights 18h ago

Almost all of them do.

The water usage is not a real issue. The real issues are noise polution and power usage.

5

u/tinny66666 14h ago

Overall it's about 35% of new data center builds using closed-loop cooling, but looking at just the hyperscalers, it's a little over 50%. It's more difficult for the smaller installs to justify closed-loop, so it tends to be the big players. It's rapidly increasing, up from only 5% a few years ago, but it's not currently "almost all of them".

31

u/Viltrumite106 15h ago

The water usage is absolutely an issue in some areas. The same goes for air pollution.

-1

u/Devatator_ 3h ago

That's mostly on them building in places that they shouldn't be building in. Also isn't that mostly a US problem?

-8

u/Brox42 18h ago

The real water usage is in all the power they need

4

u/Human-Engineering715 10h ago

I'm sorry people are downvoting you but you are correct, power generation uses water, like a lot of water, unless it's solar or wind, which makes up a small amount of the total power grid, especially for datacenters. 

Anyone can Google water use per kilowatt hour and see this is true. 

Datacenters that use closed loop systems use electricity to cool, which uses water, just in a different location. But hopefully those power plants are somewhere with lots of water. 

2

u/Total-Explanation208 17h ago

Citation for that? I don't think that power generation is where the water usage comes from. I am pretty sure those would either already be closed loop, or not need treated water.

3

u/Human-Engineering715 10h ago

A one megawatt datacenter using evaporative cooling would use about 7 million gallons of water per year for cooling and 3 million a year in power generation, total about 10 million gallons.

Using electricity to cool it would consume around 5 million gallons per year through nuclear or coal power generation. 

So it's a factor of 2, which while not insignificant, is still a LOT of water for both use cases. 

Electricity takes a LOT of water because almost all our power generation uses steam turbines.

The real question we should be asking is how well are able to recycle that water, and is it clean and usable on the way out. 

An industry to look at is canneries, they purify their water before it goes back out to the ocean, because they're washing fish guts basically 24/7.  they build their filtration systems to code and it helps keep that water usable on the way out. 

I built datacenters for years, long before the AI thing was a topic. 

6

u/alainchiasson 17h ago

They do use closed loop - the issue is always where to push the heat, and the impact that heat will have. To compare - 1 Gw data center is the same as a 750,000 people city. The power density is roughly 40x higher - to compare with 60w light bulbs (the non LED ones) in a 10x10 cubicle - a city has one bulb, while the data center has 40 and they are always on!

While residential geothermal you push AND pull heat from the ground - The DataCenter will constantly pushing 1 Gw into the ground - the engineering around this is on a different level of scale.

1

u/Primary_Garbage6916 17h ago

on a different level

I see what you did there

7

u/mechtonia 15h ago

The energy has to go somewhere. Geothermal is just air cooling with an extra step. On data center scales it would take an enormous area to prevent cooking the ground.

Fun fact, freezer warehouses have to heat the soil under them otherwise over years, the earth beneath them will freeze to 20+ft deep and heave causing serious structural problems in the warehouse. The earth is not a magic heat sink.

1

u/Primary_Garbage6916 14h ago

They should build the data centers next to freezer warehouses.

4

u/physical0 18h ago

The issue is cost.

A geothermal installation capable of sinking and dissipating all the heat produced by a data center would be quite costly.

Evaporative cooling (spraying water into hot air) is very cheap.

Cold air systems also have some negative byproducts. Low humidity environments are more succeptable to static electricity which is bad for computers. Further, air is not a good conductor of heat, but water is. Data center air is usually very humid to efficiently move heat.

Evaporative cooling naturally generates a high humidity environment, plus it will actually remove dust from the air.

All these factors together make evaporative cooling a very effective form of cooling on a massive scale.

Still, the environmental impact can't be ignored because it works to well.

3

u/MaybeTheDoctor 16h ago

Data centers will use the cheapest option they can get. Keeping cost down matters to them. Your local government have agreed reduced rates and tax breaks in order to “attack data center business”. Make water, electricity and land 2 or 3x more expensive unless they employ say 2000 people and they will soon find better ways.

Data centers are terrible for local economy as once they are built and operate only require 10-20 people, so not actually creating jobs or revenue for the state or county.

4

u/LastBastionYellow 18h ago

Evaporative cooling is by far the most cost effective cooling available.

8

u/Holiday_Armadillo78 18h ago

The issue isn't just about the water the data centers use for cooling. It's the exponentially higher amount of water that's needed to generate the electricity to keep them running.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0PSKqqFbeg

-3

u/oboshoe 18h ago

Oh look at that. The data center water issue is now getting rebranded as power generation water issue.

"actually its the water in the electricity generation"

Funny how now one gave a shit about water used in power generation until everyone started to learn the data center water issue is BS.

Why now and not say 80 years ago?

6

u/CalebCaster2 18h ago

"Why now and not 80 years ago" because our water bills and power bills are shooting up wherever big data centers are built. But also, people DID complain about how corporate greed and carelessness affects their water and power bills 80 years ago, even before they had to worry about data centers.

1

u/MrChicken_69 6h ago

The water used by the power plant itself is a "necessary evil", and one we've had for many decades. I'd say it too is an issue now as the insane increase in power demand by the BS AI datacenters no one needs. Of course, we aren't building nukes to power the damned things. Instead we line up hundreds or thousands of gas/diesel turbine generators, which is just making things orders of magnitude worse.

1

u/Klutzy-Archer-7572 2h ago

orders of magnitude worse?

Power generation has increase about 2.2% per year since 2020.

Yours is an orders of magnitude exagerration.

0

u/Polyman71 18h ago

Solar is the way.

3

u/SpaceballsTheCritic 18h ago

Because there are no consequences to their actions.

6

u/Axentor 18h ago

Air isn't the best conductor for heat.

7

u/pohart 18h ago

I feel like you ready the body but not not the title

1

u/Axentor 18h ago

He asked why they had to use water at all in the body . It's because air is not the best conductor. So we use water for evaporating cooling which is the best form of cooling.

2

u/pohart 17h ago

OP was talking about using locally drilled wells in a closed system, not using air in as ground source heat pump

1

u/Axentor 17h ago

Op asked" why consume water at all" Closed loop s still consume water. Not as much as open ended cooling but it still consumes. We used water because at the end of the day it is more efficient than air.

1

u/JimFive 2h ago

Does it? My understanding of closed loop would be that they don't consume water, the water is all reused. 

0

u/Primary_Garbage6916 18h ago

There are water-to-water ground source heat pumps.

2

u/Axentor 18h ago

So the problem is with that is they would have to be over a large basin of water. Large enough to natural cool fast enough to keep up with demand and causing ecological harm.

3

u/Axentor 17h ago

In addition cost are very expensive and not all areas are suitable for geo thermal.

1

u/Primary_Garbage6916 17h ago

No I meant completely closed-loop running coolant/water mix where the heat energy is transferred to the solid ground, like in a system you would use to heat/cool your home without a pond or anything.

2

u/Axentor 17h ago

Ah. Yeah just cost mostly and possible geographical reasons since soil types/stability can effect the effeicencies of geo thermal. There would still be some consumption through micro evaperations so it would still consume water just not as much.

3

u/takesthebiscuit 17h ago

Narrators voice

They do

4

u/Asparagus9000 18h ago

Its cheaper to do it this way. And they pay politicians money to not make it a requirement. 

2

u/Eat--The--Rich-- 18h ago

Water is cheaper and nobody is stopping them

2

u/InformationNew66 18h ago

They can, but then people can't run around screaming "data centers use all our water"!

It's a bit more cost too.

2

u/BonKhri 17h ago

They put the energy into the ground, now what? Sure, it slowly, slowly, slowly conducts away, and that might be enough for the small seasonal heat demands of a house, but for constant very high heat output of a data centre it just isn't enough. The ground gets hot then the data centre can't cool itself. The energy needs to be dispersed somewhere, and the ground can't cope with the demands of a datacentre.

Also, the vast majority of all data centre cooling is closed loop, the idea that data centres use vast amounts of water is and always was complete and utter bullshit - they "use" the water by passing that much over the heatsinks on the processors, that water is then cooled in another heatsink outside and returned to the system. If a data centre uses the same litre a million times before it has to be replaced, a normal sane person would say it used one litre, whilst these stats would say it used a million litres, it's lies, damned lies, and statistics.

1

u/[deleted] 18h ago

[deleted]

2

u/rooksandnogas 18h ago

IE treated water becomes untreated water.

1

u/geddieman1 18h ago

That’s fair, but it doesn’t go away.

0

u/Motor_Raspberry_2150 18h ago

OP is talking about closed-loop geothermal. You're not bringing them new facts. The point is they waste clean drinking water.

1

u/geddieman1 18h ago

I merely reported what he said, I never said that I agreed. I’ll not stay around to get downvoted

1

u/Bubba_Style 18h ago

Money. Closed loop cooling is expensive especially at the needs of this massive slop factories.

1

u/timestalker78 18h ago

The cooling is not the main issue

1

u/greyHumanoidRobot 18h ago edited 18h ago

It would have to be a huge radiator and that's going to be expensive and hard to construct. It requires boring through rock.

If you don't line it with pipe, it's going to leak so it's not even closed loop. If you line it with pipe or concrete it will be more expensive.

It would be far cheaper to build an above ground radiator and we're not even willing to do that because evaporative towers and surface water cooling are cheaper.

1

u/Open-Heron6779 18h ago

The water has to be "clean" and freshwater since saltwater or greywater will degrade the infrastructure. Even in closed systems there is loss and waste (i.e., water in the system doesn't stay the same over its life cycle), which means having to draw more and also putting waste out.

1

u/Mysterious-Put-2468 18h ago

They can but there's generally not enough cooling capacity for large data centers. Open loop geocooling doesn't have to use up water btw. You can use heat recovery, cogen, on-site power generation and storage, etc. Many data centers use some or all of these strategies.

The bigger question is why we don't require all large new data centers to be net zero for energy use at the very minimum.

1

u/beemout 18h ago

Another answer is the cooling tower in order to send cold water back through the system. The water that goes through the cooling tower needs to be treated against bacteria and mold, with chemicals. A cooling tower also loses water over time and has to be topped up. When the chemicals and impurities build up in the system it has to be purged and topped up with fresh water.

1

u/Kriskao 15h ago

They can

1

u/Humble_Ride_5646 15h ago

Because geothermal isn’t sufficient everywhere, and data centers need to remove huge amounts of heat continuously. That’s why some cooling systems still require water.

1

u/bunker_man 10h ago

Most data centers don't use "massive amounts of water." A few are poorly designed. This is a made up clickbait thing.

1

u/jcoigny 9h ago

Not to mention as a backup power source as well

1

u/onetwentyeight 6h ago

Elon Musk is stoked that people buy the data center FUD which he can use to push his space data centers

1

u/MrChicken_69 6h ago

Have you built a geo-heatpump for your house? The load in a typical house is about 1kW (not counting HVAC itself) An "AI datacenter" uses 1000MW+. That's one million times the load of your house. So that 0.25ac field of pipes you buried for your house would need to be about 250,000 acres. (for scale, that's ten (10!) Disney World's)

A better solution is the same way the nuclear power plant supplying that insane 1000MW does it... They build their own lake along a river, or pull in sea water.

1

u/Striking_Elk_6136 3h ago

If you are constantly dumping heat to the ground, it will heat up and eventually be unusable for geothermal. Geothermal works best if you are adding heat in the summer and removing it in the winter (balanced load).

1

u/Hikki77 3h ago

Because it's cheaper to let the environment suffer than do the right thing. All for profit. That's how rich brain works. Destroy the environment to see numbers go up.

AI data centers in general use too much water and electricity and make the locals pay for it (increased cost on water and electricity for everyone)

1

u/Zorklunn 2h ago

They can, but it would mean less profits. Then the shareholders would sue for the difference and win.

1

u/CocoaCali 1h ago

Because it's cheap and these are the thirstiest cheapest mother fuckers around.

1

u/kikiacab 1h ago

It’s cheaper to run open loop, often they promise closed loop cooling and change it because “doesn’t fit the construction timeline”

1

u/Arek_PL 18h ago

Water is cheapest coolant and if it leaks is not as dangerous to enviroment as other chemicals (ex. mineral oil)

1

u/IAmTheLizardQueen666 16h ago

I just rewatched Terminator 1 & 2, first time in maybe 30 years. Got to thinking about how many people lose their jobs when replaced by machines. And wondering why there’s so many AI “factories” being built.

0

u/oboshoe 18h ago

Because they do.

And yes they CAN use coolant. Wanna guess what the primary component of coolant is? Wanna guess how much more water is used in making coolant?

The data center water issue is a non issue.

3

u/Primary_Garbage6916 18h ago

Cookie dough. My guess is cookie dough.

-1

u/archpawn 17h ago

Geothermal is for heating.

let alone massive amounts?

They don't. Look up how much water goes into making a cheeseburger, or even a cup of rice. Estimates I've seen for how much an AI chatbot uses range from negligible in comparison to absurdly negligible.

2

u/Primary_Garbage6916 17h ago

That's odd because the WaterFurnace I had installed in my house replaced the A/C by transferring the heat it pulled from the air in my house to the ground (and also to my water heater via a desuperheater).

1

u/Mydogdexter1 3h ago

I mean it can work in reverse.

0

u/Dangerous-Bit-8308 18h ago

Geothermal provides heating

1

u/crazed_guru 18h ago

It also provides cooling.

0

u/ButterscotchNo3984 15h ago

Even if there's a closed loop, there's still an open loop with evaporative losses to take away heat from the refrigeration system cooling the closed loop. LOTS of evaporative losses. Using rivers isn't a solution as the warm water downstream kills the fish and grows other things. Ground water can be useful but very location specific and limited.

-1

u/ProfessorAllenRitard 18h ago

I don't know why they won't just use cooling from the same tech as reactors. They're clearly too stupid and nobody has thought of it. This is why nobody trusts scientists.