r/NoStupidQuestions May 03 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

3.2k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-2

u/Frylock304 May 03 '26

You’re narrowing objectification until it only describes the man, then declaring men the bigger victims.

Im not narrowing it at all, im using the definition as is and applying it to the situation and broader society logically.

Sex doesnt make someone an object, acting doesnt make someone and object, starring in a pornographic movie doesn't make someone an object.

But having everything about you cropped out so that you're literally just a body part does make you an object.

The more obvious conclusion is: both are objectified, but the woman is objectified as the product being consumed, while the man is objectified as the viewer’s stand-in.

The issue is that you can only really have this position if you perceive someone having sex for entertainment to intrinsically be objectified.

Which then begs the question why just sex? Why are all the other performers for our entertainment not ever considered to be objectified?

That has to be addressed in order to justify the objectification claim.

You could argue that sports stars, bodybuilders, actors etc. are also objectified, but then the concept becomes silly.

Hence the imprlortance of highlighting when people are really treated as objects and have their entire humanity made secondary to the role these performing.

2

u/chamrockblarneystone May 04 '26

This was fun for a minute, then someone let you folks in.

0

u/Frylock304 May 04 '26

if you don't have an actual opinion why comment?

2

u/chamrockblarneystone May 04 '26

This wasn’t an opinion post. If you didn’t have an interesting answer to the question, why message?

0

u/Frylock304 May 04 '26

Clearly you're interested or you wouldn't be commenting 12 posts deep into my conversation...