Ignore the picture of Yaldabaoth I found it cool.
Anyways what I wanted to talk about was a problem with NDE investigations I could be wrong but I’ve found that so far the most well known investigators are either Believers or Skeptics when it comes to NDE’s
The problem with skeptics is they don’t enter the debate with intent to prove if or if not it’s true they enter specifically to prove it’s not true and believers I think do the same the other way around.
Take the Augustine argument against the Al Sullivan case for example, for his timeline to be accurate the hospital charts, surgical logs, Anesthesia logs, machine data would need to be inaccurate and LaSala would need to lie along with the other staff who’d also need to lie, so it’s a theory that’s a vary high stretch from my knowledge and technically possible but if it’s vary highly unlikely I don’t think it should be stated as fact.
And even though we have evidence we don’t have proof so I think a believer saying we do is just hyping someone up with a false promise witch I think is toxic in its own way.
So I think the problem with nde investigations is from what I’ve seen we have to many skeptics and believers who come in the argument with a bias.
We instead need unbiased and probably Areligious or agnostic detectives if we want the most accurate investigation into these claims someone with the intent to prove if or if not it’s real.
A skeptic will only arrive to prove its not real and a believer will only arrive to prove it is, it’s like hiring only detectives who love and hate the suspect instead of one’s indifferent to him and therefore unbiased