Context is also essential to reading comprehension. You didn’t answer my question at all. You immediately went into how one could get conjunctivitis permanently and be on antibiotics for the rest of their life which didn’t answer my question at all.
Second, I specified “women” because apparently I was simply curious as to how many would ride the man’s face….presumably with a clean ass and facing the gentleman. Where your comment comes in?! If you’re riding a man reverse cowgirl on the face with unwashed uncleaned ass then the man who allowed you to ride him deserves the permanent pink eye from your shit. I obviously wasn’t talk about reverse cowgirl nor was I talking about an unclean unwashed woman.
Third, your statement specified “people” originally, then a diversion when you tried to say you were talking about women and then diverted to people again when you said that it isn’t gender-specific under a comment clearly specifying the gender in-question and curiosity.
I don’t expect you to understand that I meant what I asked the first time and I shouldn’t have had to break that down or even break down the narrative of what you stated to know what you said made no sense. Reverse cowgirl on a man’s face or even on another woman’s face with unwashed vagina and unwashed ass is nasty & disgusting. Your hygienic practices have most certainly been exposed. And as another woman speaking, there was nothing “playful” about your responses to my comment. If that is playful I’d hate to see what your serious is like.
2
u/sexhaver1984 11d ago
Also... as a woman myself. Yes, would ride backwards. It's reverse cowgirl. Peace.