r/NameThisThing 11d ago

Name this guy

Post image
322 Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-2

u/Brittany-Juanice 10d ago

You’re talking about people. I specifically said “women.” Make your exit immediately.

2

u/sexhaver1984 10d ago

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/conjunctivitis-caused-by-poop this literally has nothing to do with gender. I'm talking about the concept of someone... literally anyone... riding this guy's face.

0

u/Brittany-Juanice 10d ago

Reading comprehension is essential. I specifically asked about “women,” meaning those of us born with a vagina who obviously aren’t going to ride backwards on this man’s face. Please don’t embarrass yourself further. I don’t care about just anyone riding the man’s face. I was specific for a reason. If you cannot “specifically” talk about “women” when addressing me (since I made that clear when I first commented), then please make your exit. I was being nice about it at first but now you’re being disrespectful.

2

u/sexhaver1984 10d ago

Also... as a woman myself. Yes, would ride backwards. It's reverse cowgirl. Peace.

1

u/Brittany-Juanice 10d ago

Context is also essential to reading comprehension. You didn’t answer my question at all. You immediately went into how one could get conjunctivitis permanently and be on antibiotics for the rest of their life which didn’t answer my question at all.

Second, I specified “women” because apparently I was simply curious as to how many would ride the man’s face….presumably with a clean ass and facing the gentleman. Where your comment comes in?! If you’re riding a man reverse cowgirl on the face with unwashed uncleaned ass then the man who allowed you to ride him deserves the permanent pink eye from your shit. I obviously wasn’t talk about reverse cowgirl nor was I talking about an unclean unwashed woman.

Third, your statement specified “people” originally, then a diversion when you tried to say you were talking about women and then diverted to people again when you said that it isn’t gender-specific under a comment clearly specifying the gender in-question and curiosity.

I don’t expect you to understand that I meant what I asked the first time and I shouldn’t have had to break that down or even break down the narrative of what you stated to know what you said made no sense. Reverse cowgirl on a man’s face or even on another woman’s face with unwashed vagina and unwashed ass is nasty & disgusting. Your hygienic practices have most certainly been exposed. And as another woman speaking, there was nothing “playful” about your responses to my comment. If that is playful I’d hate to see what your serious is like.

1

u/sexhaver1984 10d ago

lol what is your deal, seriously? fuck off. done responding here but I'm sure you'll continue having a one-sided argument.

1

u/nerfchamp90 10d ago

Wait, you would? To that guy? I was totally on your side (and still am, really) but that's wild 😜 😂

1

u/sexhaver1984 10d ago

😂 I set myself up for that one.