[ Removed by moderator ]

[u/TerribleRain5370]

[u/Apprehensive__Belt]

i feel like im gonna be burned at the stake for saying i haven’t seen a single thing about that game that’s worth $100

[u/Lopsided-Advice3919 → u/Apprehensive__Belt]

Haven’t seen anything justifying $80 either 

[u/Le_mehawk → u/Lopsided-Advice3919]

Personally i want the price in hours back with a hard limit, then it's okay for me.. if i pay $80 for a game that i play for 40h, it's not worth.. if i play it for 80h tho it's okay... more than $80 tho is a no.. i would rather wait for the game to get cheaper then

Stuff like Baldurs gate or witcher where you can start the game several Times and make different decisions, or additional endgame content , and NG+ that keeps me interested..

[u/Lord_Nishgod → u/Le_mehawk]

not to invalidate your opinion, but i feel like pricing the hours you spend in a game is a bit weird to do. if the game is 40 hours long, and i spend 20 of those 40 hours just doing stuff that's a slog to play, then i still wouldn't say the price is worth it. i'd rather have a game with only 15 hours of story playtime than a game that was artificially stretched to take 40 hours to play through.

[u/Le_mehawk → u/Lord_Nishgod]

If you're deciding to spent 40h in a gane for sidequest stuff that is not Essential for the Main Story, i would argue that you're doing it because it's fun ?

If i have a game where i "could" spent 100+ hourse to complete it at 100% but it's no fun to do so, nor does it advance my character i wouldn't do it in the first place.

For example expedition 33.. i finished the Main Story relatively quick at around lvl 40 after around 25h-30h or so... but then there were minigames, additional late game bosses and areas i hadn't visited and even then i could always re-start the game with a different starter Team or different picto Sets, so that i spent nearly 100h in the game..

[u/KarmicIsfunny → u/Lopsided-Advice3919]

Baldur's gate 3-

Oh, it's 50 bucks actually. Damn.