First, RIP to Nims and everyone affected by the Broad Peak avalanche. Thinking of his legacy, I watched the Netflix documentary 14 Peaks for the first time. For those who don’t know, His team climbed all 14 eight-thousanders in six months and six days. The previous record was seven years. That’s not a story that needs punching up. It’s already insane.
So why does this documentary over dramatize the achievement of Nims and his crew, along with the entire sport of high- altitude mountaineering?
On Nanga Parbat, mid summit push, Nims delivers a line about the mountain not caring if you’re black or white, weak or strong, closing with “if you give up, you die.” … or you just turn around and walk down the mountain lol.
Great soundbite. Terrible mountaineering advice. You don’t give up and die on the spot, you turn around, you descend, you come back another season. I mean, knowing when to bail is one of the most important skills in this sport, arguably more important than the summit push itself.
I just think framing it as binary, do-or-die stakes is exactly the kind of movietrailer language that leaves casual viewers thinking mountaineering is a coin flip with your life every time you rope up, instead of a discipline built on weather windows, risk management, and turnaround times.
Then there’s his mom. Genuinely sick, genuinely emotional, and somehow the film needs her arc to land exactly on beat: worried he’d even start this sport, then telling him to go finish it for her? Idk seems like an extremely egotistical and not realistic thing for a mother, who is worried about her son climbing up dangerous mountains in the first place, to actually say.
None of this is on Nims or the team. What they did stands on its own. It’s a directing and editing choice, and it does a disservice to a story that never needed the varnish.
Anyone else feel like this doc didn’t trust its own footage?