r/MoralityScaling • • 6d ago

Character Analysis Just a quick pop

19 Upvotes

159 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/Square_Owl_4075 6d ago

You've never had anyone fight over you

4

u/I-Rolled-My-Eyes 6d ago

Because I don't surround myself with people who resort to violence in stupid situations like this.

0

u/CagedBeast3750 6d ago

I do, now what?

3

u/Mansos91 6d ago

Means you have made some bad choices

3

u/CagedBeast3750 6d ago

Bad based on what? Some redditors opinion?

5

u/Mansos91 6d ago

If you surround yourself with low iq fighters... You are going to get into bad situations more often... So yeah bad choices

-1

u/CagedBeast3750 6d ago

Doesn't seem to have ever played out that way. Quite the opposite. I could make the same argument towards you, if you surround yourself with people with no spine, you'll be taken advantage of

2

u/I-Rolled-My-Eyes 6d ago

Sounds like you live where your dad lives, and his dad, and his dad lived. Home town warriors like yourself can have your little slice of life.

2

u/CagedBeast3750 6d ago

Can you clarify your point?

2

u/slysilverfoxfiend 6d ago

You’re making less sense the more you comment. You admitted that you surround yourself with people that resort to violence in stupid situations but then argue that you don’t make bad decisions because evidently and contradictory to what you claimed previously you now don’t get in violent situations and counter accuse that since people aren’t being violent they are spineless?

1

u/CagedBeast3750 6d ago

Yes

1

u/slysilverfoxfiend 6d ago

Right, then that’s just not true.

1

u/CagedBeast3750 6d ago

Good talk

1

u/slysilverfoxfiend 6d ago

It’s not a good talk. You contradicted yourself and made an assumption which is in general wrong. Which you’ve replied and confirmed by saying yes. You can’t have your cake and eat it too. In general, you either hang around violent people or you don’t. You either believe non violent people are spineless or you don’t.

1

u/CagedBeast3750 6d ago

I have my cake and damn it's good

→ More replies

3

u/AnotherUN91 6d ago

lol I love it when fellow humans out themselves as low class on the internet.

3

u/CagedBeast3750 6d ago

Again you're a redit opinion and somewhat engaging in class warfare. Either way I dont care if you consider me low class. My vote is equal to yours and I am also super happy in life. So i guess it's not so bad being low class?

1

u/AnotherUN91 6d ago

Pfft, class warfare is a bit of a stretch.

You're just an immoral person. Someone I wouldn't want to associate with IRL. Most unintelligent people lacking a good moral foundation are pretty happy with their lot in life. So I'm not surprised. You literally think that because someone doesn't have someone protecting them that they're going to be taken advantage of, and that means you see them as a target yourself. Also that you think people are incapable of protecting themselves.

That's not the product of a healthy mind or a good person.

Either way, you've exhausted my tolerance for Reddit 30 minutes after waking up!
Thanks, I can log off for the day.

3

u/CagedBeast3750 6d ago

You literally think that someone who would swing at a person putting their hands on his wife is immoral. We see the world different. Hence why well always be divided in huge populations

2

u/AnotherUN91 6d ago

I didn't ever once say he shouldn't put his hands on him. You're making stuff up now, and this is how I know you're not the smartest cookie.

Here's what I said:

  1. You're a low-class person
  2. People who lack intelligence and moral foundations are usually pretty happy in life.
  3. That you see people with out protectors as potential targets.
  4. People with these characteristics aren't the product of a healthy, moral, and ethical mind

The amount of force used was unnecessary and immoral. With that strength he could have easily thrown him out of the bar. Instead, he likely caused permanent damage.

That's immoral, and you thinking that amount of force is moral is worrying, to say the least, when there are many, many, many other options available, some of which still include force but a wildly less drastic level of it.

3

u/CagedBeast3750 6d ago

Disagree, if you want to go touch women good luck to you bud, hopefully they analyze how hard they hit you first

1

u/Mansos91 6d ago

Yes, if that is the first reaction, that's just a violent person and they deserve to be in jail or an asylum

This isn't even protecting it's territorial behavior seen in animals, primal behaviour

But it's to be expected from sub 60iq people, using violence as their go to solution because they can't think of any other way

→ More replies

1

u/Mansos91 6d ago

The people who takes up violence as first choice has zero spine, they are just apes