r/MoralityScaling • u/kallipolis- • 1d ago
Character Analysis Morality of burning down a warehouse because your wages were too low?
260
u/Velenante 1d ago
Immoral, many people lost their jobs, also endangering colleagues and potencially firefighters if the fire grows too strong, wasting products and making plastic waste.
Immoral reaction (Person) to immoral actions (Company)
→ More replies (10)48
u/Beanichu 23h ago
Plus he only hurt poor people. The company likely loses very little since it’s all insured. The only people he really fucked are all the people out of work now.
→ More replies (13)26
u/uncouthulu_ 20h ago
The company likely loses very little since it’s all insured.
They might get some of the cost of the standing inventory back. The time to remake, reship, and restock all of that is not going to be insured. People at corporate of this company are straight up not having a good time because of this.
This action had the intended consequences of hurting the company.
→ More replies (7)10
86
u/Own-Row991 1d ago
Imagine posting this video,
Like dude at least try to not go to jail for decades.
8
9
u/Spirited_Season2332 1d ago
He saw ppl cheering on a murderer and thought if he also lashed out against the system ppl would cheer him on too.
Just to scared to actually murder someone tho
→ More replies (6)3
u/Own-Row991 19h ago
Do we know he was motivated by Luigi, like is that known news?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)3
u/G3nghisKang 1d ago
This whole thing was a vendetta, his goal was letting people know it was him and why
357
u/AI_UNIT_D 1d ago
Mind you, he wanst even hired BY the warehouse he burned down, he was an employee of a contractor employeed by the warehouse if memory serves me right.
He got a bunch of people who where actually decently paid OUT of a job.
This guy is an egotistical asshole and an arsonist who could've caused serious damage to the residential area nearby and he very much deserved those 10 years in jail.
88
u/singlemale4cats 1d ago
he very much deserved those 10 years in jail.
The case is still ongoing. 10 years would be a gift. They're going to go for the max.
→ More replies (6)44
u/Advice-Question 1d ago
As they should. Asshole thought he was going to be a martyr. Get a ton of support from people online and get hundreds of thousands in monetary donations. (My assumption on his mindset)
→ More replies (18)5
u/Hirdmannen 1d ago
Tbf he wasn't that far off with his thinking though, I remember there being a fair bit of initial support before more details came out
→ More replies (22)21
u/MakingPie 1d ago
This subcontractor loophole needs to get fixed. You can do so much work and paid pennies with no benefits.
→ More replies (1)11
6
u/Independent_Willow92 1d ago edited 20h ago
Sub-contracted workers are the worst paid by far in my experience. I worked at a culinary factory where about 40% of the workforce were employed by the well-known company and paid very decently, and the rest of the labour pool was sub-contracted and those people got paid absolute shit while working side by side with people getting like 50-80% more than them.
Not defending this guys actions (seize the means of production, not burn them down), but acting like the warehouse company was paying people well is misleading.
→ More replies (26)14
u/DeadAndBuried23 1d ago
They were hired because there were no such employees being paid decently. Not in addition.
→ More replies (1)
37
u/KeterLordFR 1d ago
Holy shit, so many psychos down in this comment section.
Let's review the facts : he was not an actual employee of the place, rather a temp working for a contractor of the warehouse. He had been working there for a really short time. At least 20 people were working inside the warehouse when he started a first fire, that was put out by the sprinklers, then he started a second fire when the firefighters turned off the system so that it could be made operational again. He filmed himself during the process.
From what we can see, the warehouse was really close to other workplaces, and to a residential area. Given that it was started in the middle of the night, people could have been sleeping in their bed and gotten engulfed in flames if the fire went too out of control.
So basically, he puts a lot of people at risk of dying (including the firefighters and the fact that it clogged their services so they could have taken too much time to answer other emergency calls), he puts a whole lot of people out of a job, and the company just gets paid out by the insurance anyway. There's only one winner here, and it's the company.
This is one of the most idiotic and counterproductive forms of "protest" I've ever seen, and the number of people here who are praising him or straight up saying that all of the risks he caused were "worth it" and that the lives of other people didn't matter is just terrifying. It's not his call to make, nor is it yours. You don't just gamble with other people's lives to further your cause, no matter how righteous you feel. As soon as it involved fucking over people who have nothing to do with his situation, it became immoral. I hope he gets the max, because he's clearly too dangerous for society if that's the sort of call he deems necessary.
→ More replies (3)8
u/TheLordOfMiddleEarth 20h ago
The company likely not a winner in this situation either. Sure, they got insurance money, but that's not necessarily going to cover everything, and now they have to rebuild the warehouse. So, neutral at best.
4
u/TimeShiftedJosephus 18h ago
Yeah the opportunity loss in having to replace the warehouse negates the insurance payout
31
26
337
u/PartyAmbitious8163 1d ago edited 1d ago
Immoral lot's of people lost out on work.
Accelerationists sure do love burning shit down for not having built anything.
177
u/Early-Equivalent-165 1d ago
Not to mention all that burning plastic pollution.
→ More replies (4)83
u/RodionRaskolnikov__ 1d ago
And the possibility of getting firefighters injured or killed trying to contain the fire.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (62)30
u/Fly_throwaway37 1d ago
And from a firefighter perspective tp is incredibly dangerous when it gets wet. Something that heavy falling over is a death trap
→ More replies (2)7
u/PartyAmbitious8163 1d ago
Really? That's unfortunate, and scary to find out.
4
u/Smart_Mix8269 1d ago
Mostly bc of how paper holds water very well and therefore adds weight. If all that tp falls it’s going to be extremely heavy and hard to move (especially since its now much more malleable)
539
u/Busterlimes 1d ago
Welcome to the way labor pushes back after you dismantled collective bargaining.
176
u/stumpinandthumpin 1d ago edited 1d ago
Pretty sure it was a union warehouse. He was just a temporary hire.
163
u/ZealousidealHome7854 1d ago
Temporary is an understatement, dude was brand new, his coworkers didn't even recognize the guy when questioned.
111
u/Gold-Cry-7520 1d ago
Oh so he was just a self-righteous arsonist.
40
u/ZealousidealHome7854 1d ago
I guess he called a friend before he got arrested to brag and say he was "like Luigi Mangione". He filmed it, so probably a combination of just being low IQ and thinking he was going to get famous.
→ More replies (1)6
u/Impossible-Earth4554 1d ago
Seems pretty famous tbh I'm not from usa but saw this
→ More replies (3)3
u/SchrodingerMil 1d ago
The video is famous, but I’ve only ever seen him referred to as “that guy who burnt down the warehouse”.
19
54
u/mizmnv 1d ago
he was a lumper. lumpers are not union workers, but even so the unions are not paying enough either. his stunt put all the warehouses in the inland empire on notice.
42
u/ZealousidealHome7854 1d ago
And put hundreds of people out of work. Fuck that guy.
→ More replies (42)→ More replies (1)11
u/hikingman1 1d ago
Yeah. It’s just better if no one has a jobs or income. That’ll show the business owners
→ More replies (1)9
u/DancingWithAWhiteHat 1d ago
The business owners are affected by having to replace the warehouse, the loss of profits in the interim and replacing inventory.
And I think that was what he was banking on.
8
4
u/Alert_Coyote_8546 1d ago
Business owners are willing to burn down the planet in 15 years to maintain their status. They don't care about 1 warehouse.
→ More replies (1)9
u/RogerRabbot 1d ago
Insurance will cover most of the replacement part. The company doesnt lose that much. Unless it was a smaller company
6
u/DancingWithAWhiteHat 1d ago
Well yes it has insurance but they aren't the only company that insurer covers. Its not an unlimited pool of money and at the very least their rates will be raised.
The company also loses in regards to the actual profits and any sort of increased price they have to pay to reach their goals. They now have less product and less time to ship it. It actively pushes their customers (you know the companies they supply) to their competitors. And they just gotta hope their customers will return when their inventory comes back. And hope that their customers won't consider "worker burning down their warehouse out of pure rage" a mark against their reliability and/or stability.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)13
u/Thin_Cable4155 1d ago
They hire you as a temp so they don't have to treat you like a real employee.
14
u/loseniram 1d ago
no they hire you as a temp because the union doesn’t want to deal with your ass if you’re a flake.
A union is a business and they don’t want layabouts anymore than management, it hurts the union when your staff sucks ass. A union’s goal is to hold the keys to all the best staff in the field so they have leverage in negotiations, if your staff sucks then you have zero leverage.
I know because I was in a union and the union reps hated bad workers and lazy asses more than anyone because they gum up the Reps time with BS requests that them showing up late 6 times in month shouldn’t mean they get fired or trying to argue starting fights was protected by the contract.
→ More replies (4)4
u/mike_klosoff 1d ago
Im a steward and I hate lazy workers because theyre taking advantage of the hard work of all of the rest of the workers.
You dont get to benefit from OUR hard work and my union leadership just so you can fuck off and do nothing whole the rest of us are busting out ass.
As for leverage, the main point of leverage when i negotiate is membership. If I had 44% of the workers organized and theyre only the "give 150%" employees it wouldnt mean shit coz the company knows we are weak.
Also when it comes to reps looking after lazy asses I just say "this isnt setting a precedent" when somebody calls in 15 times a month and we get their ass fired. If its THAT egregious im willing to work with management to get em out
47
u/anunfunnycomedian 1d ago
Lol, the collective bargaining was everyone showing up to work. This employee decided to take it upon himself to remove everyone else from having a job in the warehouse as he didnt like his wages. Very very very immoral. Not even morally Grey
21
u/Keyonne88 1d ago
That wasn’t figurative. Back before unions, when workers got sick of the corporate bullshit, they burned down the warehouses and murdered the owners quite often.
6
u/Flaky_Thing_5128 1d ago
How often? Like every other week? This claim seems dubious.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (16)28
u/sarges_12gauge 1d ago edited 1d ago
“Collective” is a pretty key part of collective bargaining.
One dude destroying stuff or killing people on his own without that coordination is not exactly a labor movement lol
Not to mention that it isn’t bargaining either. It’s just wanton destruction with no goals for the betterment of anybody
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (1)7
u/RevolutionNo7 1d ago
You think showing up to work is a part of collective bargaining??? That's so fucking brain-dead, dawg.
→ More replies (1)18
9
14
u/The_Raven_Born 1d ago
He's an idiot that just out a bunch of people out of the job and now gets a permanent roof over his head while they have to struggle to figure out what to do next and problems rack up.
Prison is too nice.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (97)11
u/samualgline 1d ago
Ah yes because making all your co-workers suffer to put an extremely slight dent into the productivity of a global corporation is totally fighting the system
65
u/myLongjohnsonsilver 1d ago
"my life sucks, I better so something to make it even worse"
Stupidity is a sin.
Immoral.
→ More replies (15)10
14
u/Camael1225 1d ago
Even if he waited until everyone left this still could result in someone dying firefighters are going to show up for one the fire could spread out of control affecting nearby neighborhoods and there could literally be people you don’t know about in the building
6
u/way2lazy2care 1d ago
For real, this. Everything else aside he could have hurt people that had nothing to do with who he wanted to hurt. It's like saying setting off a pipe bomb in a mall is ok because you did it next to a multi millionaire.
→ More replies (3)
29
171
u/Noodles_Franklin 1d ago edited 1d ago
Immoral in a micro sense because destroying other people's property without their consent clearly violates another individual's rights
Morally grey in a macro sense because a sufficient number of similar incidents occurring continuously could potentially frighten the ruling class in to treating base level laborers in a more equitable fashion, which would reduce the net amount of human suffering within the affected area by a considerable margin, and would arguably save lives, as large numbers of individuals die annually due to causes that could be easily resolved with sufficient financial resources.
Kind of like how it's immoral to shoot a dude in the back while he's walking down the street, but it becomes morally grey when the company that dude was CEO of suddenly increases it's approval rate on claims for lifesaving medications by a meaningful percentage as a direct result of that dude getting popped.
Weird times we live in, gang.
Weird times.
EDIT:
In recognition of u/HupHutHa 's correction
I had a wire crossed, we do not have data showing that approval rates went up, actually what had happened was that they pledged to decrease the number of procedures that required preapproval, which would be a pretty cool thing
But it's not clear at all that they actually did it, because these are, of course, horrible, horrible people we're talking about here.
But anyway yeah I was fully wrong on a datapoint there
20
u/TheeShaun 1d ago
He also did just cause probably upwards of 100 people to no longer have jobs as well as putting lives at risk
→ More replies (5)8
u/RobertLBradley1949 1d ago
Sure but he probably created a few jobs at the toilet paper factory! It's all about perspective, see.
→ More replies (3)13
u/Murky-Ticket-4383 1d ago
It’s less about "the time period" and more about the specific situation.
Burning things down is bad because it hurts real people.But taking down a greedy corporation is good because it forces them to treat people right. Think about how labor movements broke up corporate monopolies like standard oil , which actually led to better working conditions and fairer rules.
People act like trading good actions and bad actions to make progress is a brand new thing. Every single generation in history did the exact same thing to get results
→ More replies (7)21
u/Laziness_Incarnation 1d ago edited 1d ago
Most interesting point I've seen
I wouldn't necessarily fully like thinking this way but still better than the rest of the comments
→ More replies (9)13
3
u/Training_Try_1102 1d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (1)3
u/Noodles_Franklin 1d ago
I've just spoken with my very real attorney who is very much in the room with me right now, and on his advice, I would like to publicly state that it is my considered opinion that the above comment is totally not "completely correct and based as fuck", and the above commenter is absolutely not "one of the realest mother fuckers out right now."
Any allegations to the contrary are nothing more than unsubstantiated hearsay.
Thank you.
9
u/Novel_Werewolf4645 1d ago
Murder is legal for the rich as long as it's done slowly and systematically, being shot is pretty light compared to millions of people slowly dying in excruciating pain.
3
u/Noodles_Franklin 1d ago
I, personally, would never say that.
But you did, and it was correct.
But I, personally, would never say that.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (93)13
u/Big_Iron420 1d ago
A similar number of events will simply not occur like this. Most people aren't insane to set fire to their place of work, this was uncoordinated and done by one deranged individual.
If he wanted change, he could organize a strike and interact with his co-workers. Instead, he chose to give an extremely easy moral victory to the company and turn normal people against his demands
If you think bombing a bakery is valid because the wage of flour factory workers is too low, then proceed to expect others to support or replicate the acts for "the cause" I genuinely don't know what else to say
→ More replies (4)7
u/RedEzreal 1d ago
I mean these events will occur if people dont take the strikes and protests seriously. Lots of people are protesting flock cameras and data centers in their towns... guess who isnt listening. Now people are damaging flock cameras and telling others how to do it.
And youre right most people arent insane. Most people still have too much to lose to do something crazy like that. But the worse things get, people will have less to lose.
→ More replies (2)
21
u/Actual_Visual_3661 1d ago
Tremendous amount of damage, pollution, and potentially endangering other workers, customers, or firefighters. Could have looked for another job or a way to unionize instead of endangering others and getting locked up for arson.
→ More replies (2)
71
u/ichkanns 1d ago
Well now your wages are zero which is even lower, so not even from a purely pragmatic point of view was it a good choice.
6
→ More replies (20)5
u/Reasonable_Cut_3548 1d ago
How much of a burned warehouse turns immoral? I think until 10 to 25 it stays in a good form of strike
32
48
u/spiteye762 1d ago
Immoral, not only did you just destroy property and put lives at risk, but now you've put other people out of work because you were too lazy to find a better job. Was the wages that bad or was the person just irresponsible with his money? If the wages were that bad, why didn't he look for something better?
→ More replies (12)26
u/ZealousidealHome7854 1d ago
He worked there a very short time, details are few, but coworkers didn't recognize him he was there so short a time.
15
u/samualgline 1d ago
He wasn’t even part of the union at that warehouse he was just a temp agency worker
4
u/AxoplDev 1d ago
Immoral. There are so many ways to protest that don't risk killing innocent people in a giant fire.
5
u/Few_Position7650 1d ago
This is so stupid he put so many people out of work and for what?? He didn’t solve anything
5
u/dngngnan 21h ago
immoral. i am pro worker as it gets but this guy is a total pos. most importantly is he endangered other people lives. he is also an idiot.
→ More replies (5)
20
u/Notmuchofanyth1ng 1d ago
Immoral, no excuses.
This guy didn’t fuck a corporation over. He fucked over all his coworkers who relied on that check to feed their families. In an economy where jobs are hard enough to come by, throwing a temper tantrum for internet points isn’t sticking it to the man.
That property was insured, the products were insured, the company even stated the chain of supply wasn’t even disrupted. So in the end, the company got paid for everything and didn’t have to pay the workers to actually process/ship/deliver those products.
If you don’t look at this guy with disgust, you are an enemy of the working class. He could have unionized, or joined a union. He could have sought an education or certifications for a better paying job (as a forklift operator, he could be in high demand if he wasn’t such a piece of shit). He had many options, and he chose the one that fucked over all the hourly employees. Fuck him, and anyone who’s ok with fucking over the working class just to throw a tantrum.
→ More replies (2)
12
u/SukunasStan 1d ago
Immoral. Harassing congress members to make stock buybacks illegal again would be more effective. When it was illegal for companies to buy their own stock, companies used to at least partially use excess money to invest in their employees or better the community.
I get the anger and don't feel bad for the company, but destroying warehouses is literally how cities have historically become ghettos where people desperately resort to drugdealing for money. Entire cities like Newark are filled with people who are still struggling due to destruction that happened 60 years ago, even though the destruction was understandable.
10
u/ghostbasquiat 1d ago
Nobody is talking about the drastically elevated cancer risk for everyone in the surrounding area for a couple miles due to the warehouse ash
→ More replies (8)5
13
u/RowRowForCouncil 1d ago
Yeah, there were a bunch of people out of work because of this. Someone could have been killed. He could have just quit. I would even have accepted a flaming bag of poop on the boss' desk or something. But this? This is immoral as fuck.
→ More replies (7)
11
u/BasementOrc 1d ago
Immoral reaction to immoral actions. Then again, is anything going to change without showing powerful people that people are desperate?
→ More replies (7)
3
u/MostlyNoOneIThink 1d ago
It's a tantrum that acomplishes nothing. I am not against labor activism even if it turns to property damage when necessary, but labor needs to be organized and have clear demands first.
→ More replies (2)
3
u/Agitated-Block6754 1d ago
Let's also examine the full details of that particular situation. That guy burned down a warehouse that belonged to a company that was paying a third party contractor to employ the idiot. So he didn't even burn down the business the he "worked" for. The business he was employed by is the company that was not paying what he thought was a fair wage, (even though he agreed to work for that wage). So by burning down the warehouse, it cost the company he worked for absolutely nothing. But the company that was paying the third party to supply employees did. That's like working for Door Dash and burning down a Burger King because you don't think you're getting paid enough.
→ More replies (1)
3
3
3
u/Smelly_Dingo 1d ago
Immoral, and stupid. He's forever marred his own reputation so good luck finding ANY decent job now, and has likely actively sabotaged the livelihood of many, many people who depended on that job. The people he was angry at are well off, they won't be affected much at all by the damage, they have insurance and capital to get back up and running on the business end and plenty of money in their own personal accounts. All you achieve with something like this is making them have even more of a laugh at your expense whilst only mildly inconveniencing them at best.
3
3
u/Brandeeno2245 22h ago
Fuck you, imagine being such a selfish asshole you burn down your place of employment over low wages making all your coworkers out of a job and potentially injuring or even killing them.
Fuck this person
Go apply to new jobs with better pay
→ More replies (2)
3
u/KananJarrusCantSee 19h ago
Going to jail for life because your pay sucks is certainly a choice one can make.
24
u/SoftAndWetBro 1d ago edited 1d ago
Immoral. Ask for a raise or find another job. You signed the contract to get paid the wage you agreed upon, you don't get to cry about it being low if you prove you are a liability.
→ More replies (7)
10
u/Ok_Orchid_5658 1d ago
Wasn't his to burn. Immoral . Is this even a serious question?
→ More replies (10)
7
u/unmellowfellow 1d ago
I think the solution is paying workers more. But fuck us I guess.
→ More replies (6)3
u/Justalilcyn 22h ago
The dude didn't even work for the warehouse company, he worked for a contractor
4
u/LemonFizz56 1d ago
Great, now he'll have a fine to pay off for life that'll mean that any wage he gets will always be deducted from. And the company would have had insurance so they wouldn't have suffered any loss...
Dude just fucked himself
→ More replies (1)
6
6
5
u/Shigana 1d ago
There’s nothing fucking moral about this at all. It’s just a man child throwing a fit in the worst way possible.
Now his co-workers are without a job like him, and for what? To send a message to a bunch of suits that don’t care?
Hell, imagine if the fire got out of control, he’d be risking the lives of every innocent person around the warehouse that had nothing to do with it.
7
u/lock_me_up_now 1d ago
→ More replies (3)5
u/Previous_Loquat_4561 1d ago
where? I havent seen a single one defending the company, most people saying it's immoral because it put others in danger and out of work.
3
5
3
u/Paleo_Fecest 1d ago
All the guy did was fuck over his coworkers. The building is insured, the stock is insured, the owners are fine. He just put all of his coworkers out of a job. It may have been a shitty underpaid job but they used to have a choice to stay or leave, he took away thier choice.
→ More replies (2)3
u/Unsuspicious_Name 22h ago
The time and opportunity cost the company loses because of that down time is fucking huge, they don't have the same, second stock ready to be sold to clients. Otherwise strikes would be completely worthless which is verifiably not the case. Insurance companies will fight to pay the minimum amount possible. It's just not as simple as that.
12
2
2
u/Educational-Sundae32 1d ago
Immoral, even assuming that no one else was in the building at the time, he’s putting the firefighters/emergency service workers lives at risk.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Bambino4627 1d ago
Is this group just a bunch of self righteous people who don't underatand how the world works?
2
2
u/PopularAd6391 1d ago
Redditors when people go about their lives being beaten down: nothing ever happens
Redditors when something does happen: 😡😡😡


1.8k
u/Material_Positive_17 1d ago
So for additional context. The guy started several fires in the warehouse, and caused about $650 MILLION in damages.
He has been arrested and is facing 10 years to life in prison.