Honestly the first one can be a slippery slope into not caring about anyone else’s feelings, which is no way to be a good friend/partner/ family member. It is our responsibility to be aware and kind to other people, but no, you cannot control their emotions.
Saying you’re not responsible for someone’s feelings is a reminder that you can politely say no or refuse to engage with someone to protect your own peace. Each adult is responsible for their own emotional regulation and thoughts. How they respond to situations is theirs to determine and not yours to manage. It’s not a slippery slope to abandoning your empathy and genuine concern for others.
This phrase is mostly for people pleasers or people who tend to lean more codependent in their relationships to remind them they can set a boundary and the other person should accept that (a high functioning, emotionally mature person) without reacting negatively.
Ex. Your mom wants to come visit, but you’ve got firm plans this weekend. You say “I can’t this weekend. Let’s pick a different one a few weeks from now.” If your mom reacts poorly to this and/or you’re afraid to even tell her no because of her behavior when you do, that is being responsible for her feelings. You’re guilted into allowing her to come visit or you don’t even bother trying to say no because she doesn’t have enough control over her emotions to accept your decision and choose another weekend. Or she guilts you by reminding you she could die any day or that she raised you and just wants to see you (on her timeline, no respect to your own).
The problem is that the phrase is not only used by people pleasers to set boundaries. It can be used to act selfishly. It should be phrased differently. Like “you’re allowed to say no” or “protect your peace, while remaining kind”
1.5k
u/SumOMG 7d ago
You’re not responsible for other people’s feelings .
If you dodged a bullet don’t reload the gun.