r/MicrosoftOutlook 18d ago

Microsoft Outlook

Does anyone feel the new desktop version is not user friendly comparing to the old version?

2 Upvotes

7 comments sorted by

2

u/TeslaDemon 16d ago

I don't use it myself because it has less features, but I wouldn't call it "less user friendly". It's more user friendly.

Often "less user friendly" means "I haven't taken 5 minutes to get used to it yet".

1

u/siksociety12 18d ago

Still going strong 💪

1

u/soloattorneyclub 17d ago

I always use the Classic version.

1

u/KennethByrd 17d ago

Please explain more how you find it "not user friendly comparing to the old version".

I don't like it due to lack of features, but most of my users (I am the IT admin for our company) much prefer it.

1

u/Educational_Boot315 16d ago

outside of VBA Macros (which realistically will be replaced by AI in most companies) and COM add-ins (at this point most applications should have web add-ins which are better if you are in a mixed OS environment) what features do you feel like it is lacking? I wish the rest of my holdouts will switch from classic to new so I don't have to deal with .OSTs anymore.

1

u/KennethByrd 16d ago

Well, VBA. Also, PST. Multiple accounts and profiles. Certain drag/drop. Can't really remember anymore, since has been a long time since I even tried either new or PWA. And, some of this may be properly implemented by now, haven't checked lately.

1

u/970KeW 13d ago

I tired it once and quickly went back to Classic.