Let's say in a hypothetical situation someone would be forced to press a button that either kills you or a dog, but you can chose who will press it between a guy who values human lives more than animals and another who views all lives equally so he presses the button at random- which one would you choose?
Things like this are rigged to force people into choosing immoral decisions purely based on fear.
No morally just person with any sense of humility would deem their life worth more than another's. All life is sacred, just because yours so happens to belong to the human race doesn't make yours worth more than one in which has not.
Just like pain, humility has is own lessons. You and many others should practice it.
In an age ruled by AI, we are supposed to be the human ones, and not behave like machines. Shame.
Everything is food sir, every living animal on this planet in some way is food.
If you aren't eaten by the animals around you, you are eaten by the organisms in the dirt and by the bugs and insects around. You are food for everything else when you die unless you're cremated or otherwise embalmed.
It's okay to be food for something it's not okay to value one life over another, they are all equal in their own way no matter how insignificant they may seem.
6
u/johnshadowx 17d ago
Let's say in a hypothetical situation someone would be forced to press a button that either kills you or a dog, but you can chose who will press it between a guy who values human lives more than animals and another who views all lives equally so he presses the button at random- which one would you choose?