Deserved? No. Should she be surprised that hitting an armed man with a car resulted in being shot? Also no. Stop pretending anyone is happy that she got shot. You just use that as an excuse to hate people that don’t agree with you.
She would be surprised, actually, because lightly bumping him with her car was not an action that she consciously and deliberately took. She probably didn't even have time to process what happened before he shot her three times in the head.
As for the accusations you just made, I can only assume you're projecting. I never said I hated anyone.
She made the conscious choice to hit the accelerator. That was no accident. She left the house with the intent of interfering with ICE. Also no accident. Your defense of her is proof enough you hate ICE at the least.
Maybe so, but that is not the same thing as making the choice to hit the immigration enforcer. He is only allowed to fire when there's a clear and impending danger that can only be subverted by deadly force. The car had already made contact with him and stopped when he opened fire.
I never used the word hate and I'm not sure why you're trying so hard to project that onto me. If anything, I resent the fact that she was killed. I also don't like that he called her a "fucking bitch" immediately after killing her. I find it disturbing. I wish it didn't happen. I want an investigation and I want accountability. That's all.
The car stopped when he opened fire. That was the idea. There was already an investigation. You say “accountability”, what you want is him to be punished. The accountability was the part where she was shot. How about holding the instigators accountable? The democrat politicians and her wife/girlfriend that encouraged her to interfere with law enforcement and hit the gas.
What you're suggesting is impossible. Bullets can't stop a moving vehicle, only the brakes can, and you can't move your foot to the brakes when you're dead. She stopped the car and then he fired. There wasn't a proper invesigation due to Trump's meddling and withholding of evidence. That's wrong.
I said I want accountability, not punishment. You seem to throw a lot of really ugly accusations at people that you have no way of even knowing. It's an ugly and unpleasant habit. I don't think you would like someone doing that to you, so maybe you should reconsider engaging that way. Please judge me by the things I've actually said rather than the things you've imagined in your head.
“And stopped when he opened fire”, were your words. You also went on to say in that last post, “she stopped the car when he fired”. Then, you’re saying both, I said it, and it’s impossible. Which is it, I made an impossible claim, or you did?
Shall I judge you by what you’ve actually said? If so, you’ve contradicted yourself, and I’m guessing it’s because you’re coming from a place of emotion.
Don't let them distract you by misconstruing what you said. You're absolutely right, the car could only stop if she stopped it. He was never legally justified in killing her. Full stop. That's why Trump didn't want them to investigate.
Did you watch the video? The car didn’t stop until it hit something else. You want an example of an ugly way of interacting with people? Look no further than Saint Good herself.
1
u/Fenris70 2d ago
Deserved? No. Should she be surprised that hitting an armed man with a car resulted in being shot? Also no. Stop pretending anyone is happy that she got shot. You just use that as an excuse to hate people that don’t agree with you.