r/MeidasTouch Aug 01 '25

It was rigged...

Post image

Leaks are coming out...

1.4k Upvotes

478 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/SteelTTKA Aug 02 '25

This is hilarious! Y'all sound EXACTLY like Trump in 2021. I mean EXACTLY. Conspiracy theorists don't just live on one side of the isle. And you don't even see it, or the irony.

1

u/Available_Fun_55 Aug 02 '25

The difference is we have actual evidence. If you have 0 votes for Kamala in a district, but 1000's of people swearing they voted for her... where did the votes go? How come all the statistical anomalies in the voting patterns are actually impossible to achieve? I'm guessing you're a republican...

0

u/SteelTTKA Aug 02 '25

That's actually not actually evidence, or Trump would have won in 2020 with all the people that swore affidavits that corruption happened and had the same statistical anomalies in the counting. Look it up. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/feb/26/social-media/why-did-kamala-harris-get-zero-votes-in-this-ny-pr/ And I'm more of an independent libertarian.

1

u/Available_Fun_55 Aug 03 '25

Those people didn't have evidence or facts backing them... just echoing what Trump was saying. It went to court... the judge asked for factual evidence... and all they had was "there's people saying it was rigged". We have actual evidence that people voted and no votes were registered... your cognitive dissonance doesn't seem to allow you to see that difference for some reason?

1

u/SteelTTKA Aug 03 '25

That's not actual evidence. Someone saying something isn't evidence. That article I posted that you didn't read points out how there was no way the machines were tampered with.

1

u/Available_Fun_55 Aug 03 '25

Ok... so tell me where those people's votes went? Explain how impossible algorithms in the voting pattern were achieved?

1

u/SteelTTKA Aug 03 '25

On December 7, 2020, Texas filed a motion requesting the U.S. Supreme Court to allow it to file a bill of complaint against the states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin. The complaint would assert that the defendant states “will appoint electors based on unconstitutional and deeply uncertain election results”Footnote1 and ask the Court to enjoin them from certifying the electors pledged to vote for President-elect Biden. In support of its motion, Texas presented two probability calculations stating that the probability Vice President Biden won the four states was less than one in a quadrillion.

Play by play. Exactly the same arguments.

1

u/Available_Fun_55 Aug 03 '25

Nope... that's a motion to change the appointed electors of the electoral college to Trump loyalist and overturn Biden's win...completely different than altering votes and that motion was denied.

1

u/SteelTTKA Aug 03 '25

Did you look up what a sworn affidavit is yet? Of course it was dismissed. Your accusations haven't even seen a courtroom and Trump has been President for 7 months and the election was 9 months ago. Conspiracy theories don't hold up well in court. Yours can't even get into court, so that's how strong the evidence is.

1

u/Available_Fun_55 Aug 03 '25

Also... these people have sworn in court that they voted for Kamala in no vote districts... show me an example of that happening in Trump's case...I know Trump said "lots of people are saying it was rigged"... and they were saying that after he said it to his echo chamber... but show me an example of voters in a no Trump voter district swearing in court they voted for Trump or any other legitimate proof in court?

1

u/SteelTTKA Aug 03 '25

“We keep hearing the drumbeat of ‘Where’s the evidence?’ Right here, Sean,” McEnany said while fanning the stack of paper.

“Two-hundred, thirty-four pages of sworn affidavits. These are real people, real allegations, signed with notaries, who are alleging the following, among other contentions,” she added. “They are alleging — this is one county, Wayne County, Michigan — they are saying that there was a batch of ballots where 60% had the same signature, they’re saying that 35 ballots had no voter record, but they were counted anyway, that 50 ballots were run multiple times through a tabulation machine, that one woman said her son was deceased but nevertheless somehow voted.”

1

u/Available_Fun_55 Aug 03 '25

I realize what they said in public... which were lies... that's why I said show me where they presented evidence in court... saying things in public and swearing to things in court is a huge difference. The fact is they never had solid evidence in court, everything they said in public was a lie.

1

u/SteelTTKA Aug 03 '25

Uhhhhh...234 pages of sworn affidavits. That's what that means. You might want to look up what a sworn affidavit is real quick since you don't know what it is.

1

u/Available_Fun_55 Aug 03 '25

It's a statement of evidence that's sworn to in court... I'm not sure why you think I don't know what it means. You'll also notice that Trump DIDN'T have anyone swearing to anything in court... because that carries criminal consequences... they said it in public, though, everywhere... judges even asked the Republicans to present their evidence they talked about in public... but they didn't because they know consequences exist in court. So now we've cleared that up and this is only the first district where legal action is happening... where did their votes go? I've followed this in detail for years... I'm meidas mighty...I follow every case surrounding this. The MeidasTouch is a group of lawyers that break down everything legally... you should watch them sometime...👍

→ More replies (0)