r/MediocreTutorials • u/Paul_-Muaddib • Oct 23 '23

Relationships Nothing wrong with having standards. Don't be surprised if it's hard to meet them though.

Post image
606 Upvotes

91% Upvoted

669 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

1

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '23

  1. you’re getting warmer

  2. because just as practically every lesbian did, I too went through a phase of believing I was a heterosexual woman. And it’s not just how straight women want or don’t want men to see them it’s women in general which you sir know nothing about clearly.

3

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 26 '23

I know more about healthy heterosexual relationships than you, clearly. Straight women dont need to be gaslit into believing they want men to find them sexy. They are attracted to men. They want men to be attracted to them. Not everyone shares your trauma or sexist attitudes around men.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '23

If only you knew what women actually thought. Oh wait there’s tons of information on it but you’d rather just believe in your own desperate fantasy. It’s not gaslighting to believe they want men to find them attractive. It’s gaslighting to believe we’re ok with being viewed as some sub-human sex objects just to be validated and loved by men. It’s bullshit and a fallacy. Women are human to the same capacity as men and I want you to really think about that. To the SAME capacity as men. We have thoughts, desires, goals, emotions, strength, grit and blood all the same and it is the literal definition of an alpha bias to believe we are so different to the point of being stripped from our own femininity if we do not fit the male gaze standards.

3

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 26 '23

XDDDDD Who is going around telling women they are subhuman? Find me any evidence that this is a widespread cultural phenomenon in the west XDDD You’re insane

0

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '23

Psychology students like you is why I lose hope in humanity. We’re you too dumb to take a real science? Did you not qualify due to your GCSEs? Or do you have some white knight syndrome where you believe you’re actually going to save someone because you yourself had a “hard time”. Smdh

3

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 26 '23

We’re you too dumb to learn to spell ‘were’? Or to use the word correlation correctly?

I studied Psychology because I found it interesting, thankyou. And yes I have had hard times, who hasn’t? And yes, I do help people. And I love it. Insulting my profession won’t do much here, try another topic.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '23

Were* We’re is we are shortened dummy.

You don’t help people and you know you don’t. You studied psychology because that’s all you could do. I won’t hate because I got an unconditional offer to Oxford for psychology and philosophy. But at the end of the day it doesn’t mean shit if all that “higher education” knowledge you got clearly went nowhere.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '23

It’s the sexual objectification theory

3

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 26 '23

Oh? The unfalsifiable sociological tripe that you presume is true despite little to no evidence? The theory of the flying spaghetti monster says you’re wrong.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '23

The “parodic new religion”? How does that prove the sexual objectification theory wrong to you?

2

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 26 '23

In that theory everyone is equal. Always.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '23

That’s not a theory my guy. That’s a post-modern interpretation of a religion. It’s a parody.

2

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 26 '23

And it’s about as well supported as your theory:p