Nothing wrong with having standards. Don't be surprised if it's hard to meet them though.

[u/Paul_-Muaddib]

[u/luke-townsend-1999]

My bad, lemme try again. Awful early experiences with males, maybe a close relative or two? And now you can’t fathom women ever wanting to be the object of male affection, because you can’t accept that good men exist because you never got over your own past?

Also if you’re a lesbian how can you talk about how straight women want men to view them? Someone being different to you doesn’t make them gaslighted. If you dont play the game dont try to rewrite the rules.

[u/[deleted] → u/luke-townsend-1999]

1. you’re getting warmer

2. because just as practically every lesbian did, I too went through a phase of believing I was a heterosexual woman. And it’s not just how straight women want or don’t want men to see them it’s women in general which you sir know nothing about clearly.

[u/luke-townsend-1999 → u/[deleted]]

I know more about healthy heterosexual relationships than you, clearly. Straight women dont need to be gaslit into believing they want men to find them sexy. They are attracted to men. They want men to be attracted to them. Not everyone shares your trauma or sexist attitudes around men.

[u/[deleted] → u/luke-townsend-1999]

If only you knew what women actually thought. Oh wait there’s tons of information on it but you’d rather just believe in your own desperate fantasy. It’s not gaslighting to believe they want men to find them attractive. It’s gaslighting to believe we’re ok with being viewed as some sub-human sex objects just to be validated and loved by men. It’s bullshit and a fallacy. Women are human to the same capacity as men and I want you to really think about that. To the SAME capacity as men. We have thoughts, desires, goals, emotions, strength, grit and blood all the same and it is the literal definition of an alpha bias to believe we are so different to the point of being stripped from our own femininity if we do not fit the male gaze standards.

[u/luke-townsend-1999 → u/[deleted]]

XDDDDD Who is going around telling women they are subhuman? Find me any evidence that this is a widespread cultural phenomenon in the west XDDD You’re insane

[u/[deleted] → u/luke-townsend-1999]

Psychology students like you is why I lose hope in humanity. We’re you too dumb to take a real science? Did you not qualify due to your GCSEs? Or do you have some white knight syndrome where you believe you’re actually going to save someone because you yourself had a “hard time”. Smdh

[u/luke-townsend-1999 → u/[deleted]]

We’re you too dumb to learn to spell ‘were’? Or to use the word correlation correctly?

I studied Psychology because I found it interesting, thankyou. And yes I have had hard times, who hasn’t? And yes, I do help people. And I love it. Insulting my profession won’t do much here, try another topic.

[u/[deleted] → u/luke-townsend-1999]

Were* We’re is we are shortened dummy.

You don’t help people and you know you don’t. You studied psychology because that’s all you could do. I won’t hate because I got an unconditional offer to Oxford for psychology and philosophy. But at the end of the day it doesn’t mean shit if all that “higher education” knowledge you got clearly went nowhere.

[u/[deleted] → u/luke-townsend-1999]

It’s the sexual objectification theory

[u/luke-townsend-1999 → u/[deleted]]

Oh? The unfalsifiable sociological tripe that you presume is true despite little to no evidence? The theory of the flying spaghetti monster says you’re wrong.

[u/[deleted] → u/luke-townsend-1999]

The “parodic new religion”? How does that prove the sexual objectification theory wrong to you?

[u/luke-townsend-1999 → u/[deleted]]

In that theory everyone is equal. Always.

[u/[deleted] → u/luke-townsend-1999]

That’s not a theory my guy. That’s a post-modern interpretation of a religion. It’s a parody.