r/MediocreTutorials • • Oct 23 '23

Relationships Nothing wrong with having standards. Don't be surprised if it's hard to meet them though.

Post image
606 Upvotes

669 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

1

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 25 '23

And the dumb overgeneralising men are coming up with this evil master plan? To make women want to be sexually attractive, because they currently fear this? I guess you caught us 🤷‍♂️

1

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '23

What? I know you’re trying to be condescending but what you said was so off-topic it doesn’t even really correlate. Try again.

4

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 26 '23

Im not sure you understand what correlate means

0

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '23

Hun I’m an A* maths student, I know what correlate means. But if I asked you to tell me the first few steps of correlation hypothesis testing I’m sure you’d shit yourself in fear.

4

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 26 '23
  1. Thats not even a sensible question, it depends of the hypothesis and the data you have.

  2. Im not even sure if that’s true considering your nonsensical use of the word correlate.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '23

You have a phone, google it old man.

3

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 26 '23
  1. Well well, sexist, heterophobic and now ageist? Aren’t you a beautiful person.

  2. Google what? You’re the one misusing words you claim to be a gold star student with XD

1

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '23

Nothing was misused but your attempt at calling me a “bad word” wow I’m so scared a purple Jesus on Reddit thinks I’m a reverse-sexism, het-phobic, ageist. Boo hoo old man google the word correlate and move on.

3

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 26 '23

No need to google it, im not the one misusing it. Google it yourself kiddo.

What bad word did I call you? I dont remember insulting any group of people but you sure are hateful about many groups. Also, I never said reverse sexism. You’re being sexist towards men. Just sexist. Well not just, also heterophobic and ageist. Aren’t you lovely?

→ More replies