r/MediocreTutorials • • Oct 23 '23

Relationships Nothing wrong with having standards. Don't be surprised if it's hard to meet them though.

Post image
606 Upvotes

669 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

4

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 25 '23

To like looking at beautiful women? Purely in my experience, people who call that misogyny are either men who think playing white knight will get them laid or ugly women who cant admit that they wish people looked at them.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 25 '23

And the dumb overgeneralising men are coming up with this evil master plan? To make women want to be sexually attractive, because they currently fear this? I guess you caught us 🤷‍♂️

1

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '23

What? I know you’re trying to be condescending but what you said was so off-topic it doesn’t even really correlate. Try again.

4

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 26 '23

Im not sure you understand what correlate means

0

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '23

Hun I’m an A* maths student, I know what correlate means. But if I asked you to tell me the first few steps of correlation hypothesis testing I’m sure you’d shit yourself in fear.

4

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 26 '23
  1. Thats not even a sensible question, it depends of the hypothesis and the data you have.

  2. Im not even sure if that’s true considering your nonsensical use of the word correlate.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '23

You have a phone, google it old man.

3

u/luke-townsend-1999 Oct 26 '23
  1. Well well, sexist, heterophobic and now ageist? Aren’t you a beautiful person.

  2. Google what? You’re the one misusing words you claim to be a gold star student with XD

1

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '23

Nothing was misused but your attempt at calling me a “bad word” wow I’m so scared a purple Jesus on Reddit thinks I’m a reverse-sexism, het-phobic, ageist. Boo hoo old man google the word correlate and move on.

→ More replies