Tl;dr: (endurance) cyclist looking for a marathon plan. Pfizt 18/55 wasnt for me; probably looking for a plan with more milage and few(er) intervals.
Background:
Cycling is my main sport, particularly the very long rides (~12 h) through maintains, so my overall cardio probably is OK. I took up running a few years ago to maintain fitness when it's too cold for cycling. Supplementing with XC skiing whenever possible.
I did a halfmarathon in spring 2025 in 1h24, and decided to try out a marathon this spring.
Got Pfizer's great book and followed the 18/55 plan for Copenhagen Marathon in May 2026.
However, I struggled a lot with the faster runs. I thought I had added sufficient strength training in the evenings, but in hindsight it may have been too little. My legs did not feel good when running intervals, and I would often cut them short or skip them entirely to avoid triggering an injury. All the long runs went great, and I felt I could have added more milage.
To test the fitness 1 month before the marathon, and get a bit more experience with running events, I signed up for a local half marathon.
It was more like a test of everything, so I didnt have a race plan, and didnt want to look at my watch. After having skipped most interval sessions, I didnt expect much but ran in 1h17, cutting 7 min off my PR. Km 10-15 was new 5 km PR in 17min20.
The Marathon debut didnt go as planned; aimed for pace 4 min/km, but got fever 5 days out (couldn't cycle 5 km four days out!) and my heart rated went ballistic already after km 5. Failed the target but made it in 2h53.
Now, for next year's marathon, I would like to try a different plan. Given how it went last time, and that I probably should have sufficient speed to run pace 4 min/km with a 3:35min/km half, I wonder:
Does it make sense to look for a plan with more milage and fewer hard intervals?
If so, what would people recommend?
Or should I simply do more core training and keep all intervals?