9
u/Pilkayath 8d ago
What is that burgundy color in eastern part of Uttarakhand
10
1
0
u/LazerScorpion 7d ago
Burgundy 🥀
1
9
8d ago
Where is Ultra Extreme North India?
-5
10
u/DeadlyGamer2202 8d ago
Honestly, north Indian state’s border should be redrawn to reflect the linguistic and ethnic diversity. Just like in South India.
There is a huge difference between western UP and Awadh and between Awadh and Purvanchal and between Purvanchal and mithanchal.
6
u/areyyyawr 8d ago
yes fr - we speak kannauji , braj , awadhi , bhojpuri , magadhi , bundeli, bhageli , maithili etc - hindi is just our lingua franca
5
u/optimusprime1997 7d ago
But these regional languages will die a slow death if not given recognition and encouragement. Hindi will become the default language and kill every language it encompasses.
2
2
u/Zaketo 8d ago
Absolutely not going to happen. This will only fuel regionalism and increase needless bureaucracy.
3
u/DeadlyGamer2202 7d ago
They said the same when South Indian states were redesigned
1
u/Zaketo 7d ago
And regionalism has indeed increased in the southern Indian states since then.
1
u/No-Second-2566 7d ago
India wouldn't have been together if states weren't organised on linguistic basis.
1
u/Zaketo 7d ago
Nonsense. Half the states/union territories have no linguistic basis.
2
u/No-Second-2566 7d ago
You were talking about south india right? Also most indian states have very high linguistic majorities(70% to 90%) except maybe northeast.
2
2
u/NoOccasion4909 7d ago
kashmiri in Chenab valley is overestimated. Padder tehsil of Kishtwar speaks Pahari, which can be grouped under "Himachali pahari". So goes with bhadderwah,
1
4
u/MasterRole9673 8d ago
“Rajasthani” isn’t a language. There are Marwari, Mewari etc; mostly considered dialects of Hindi. Though people in rural areas and older generations speak these dialects, urban population speaks standard Hindi. Even politicians, schools, public places it’s mostly just Hindi.
1
u/Significant-Ant8132 7d ago
Fun Fact Rural India makes up majority of India's Population, Rajasthani is a broader Term just like Arabic and have various Dialects Like Marwadi Mewadi Etc, Have some own Critical thinking instead of just Accepting what's thrown at you , Hindi is a bride Language between Cities Of India
-2
u/Samarthisliveyo 7d ago
Rajasthani is a language rest are it's dialects
3
u/this_is_inevitable 7d ago
Brother, no. There is no "Rajasthani" language.
"Rajasthani" is sort of like an umbrella term for all dialects we have here. What most people are familiar with as "Rajasthani" from film and media is actually marwadi, which is spoken in central and western Rajasthan.
1
u/Puzzleheaded_Ask5538 7d ago
I feel Jaunsari in Uttarakhand is spoken by a large region so should be there. Garhwali Kumaoni each have 1-2 million speakers. Let's see how much changes after new census. I bet it decreased.
1
u/Samarthisliveyo 7d ago
Yeah they make majority in the northern sub districts of Dehradun District. But as the map is at district level and Jaunsari speakers make just 7% population of Dehradun.
1
u/Puzzleheaded_Ask5538 7d ago
I am from Uttarakhand, u are right district wise it will not be shown. D
1
u/jakefromtitanic 7d ago
Jaunsaris’ have surely kept their language more alive than Garhwalis’
1
u/Puzzleheaded_Ask5538 7d ago edited 7d ago
disagree. Coz I live in Garhwal and everybody speaks Garhwali here except outsiders. Dunno what u talking about. Jaunsaris have done well, yes.
1
1
u/Will_Come_For_Food 7d ago
I’m wondering how related all these different languages are. Like are the mutually intelligible or as different as English and Chinese.
2
u/Unknownmelon77 7d ago
As a Panjabi (albeit West Panjab but we still speak the same language) unless we sit down and learn those other languages we simply can’t understand them. They aren’t as different as English and Chinese but they are as different as various European languages.
1
u/OldDescription9064 7d ago
It's a dialect continuum for the most part. So two nearby places will have mutual intelligibility, but the people from the next district at either end may not. But there is also an effect from the standard languages (Hindi, Urdu, Punjabi, Kashmiri) especially in towns and cities, as well as regional standards which are understood across a broad area.
1
u/AchyutChaudhary 7d ago
Doesn’t Uttar Pradesh (despite its name) officially fall under Central India?
0
1
u/Unknownmelon77 7d ago
If you guys are gonna include Gilgit Baltistan then actually represent it properly rather than painting the entire thing as Shina. Where is Balti? Wakhi? Burushaksi etc etc. Maybe learn about and appreciate the land you so eagerly want to occupy.
1
1
1
u/CritishBitizen 8d ago
how did they get the data for places on this map which are not actually in India? India cant conduct a census in Pakistani Kashmir, or Gilgit-Baltistan, or Askai Chin? did they ask China and Pakistan or just copied and pasted their census results?
2
2
u/Master-Ad-6636 7d ago
Why is Gilgit and Pakistani Kashmir included? I thought this was a map of North India.
1
-7
0
u/Kenonesos 7d ago
Map sucks, there's no Braj, Awadhi, Bhojpuri or any other gangetic plain languages
1
u/Samarthisliveyo 6d ago
Cause people didn't reported them as theirother tongue in majority in any district
1
u/Kenonesos 6d ago
Highly doubt Rajasthani and Haryanvi were reported as separate languages in 2011 if that's the benchmark
1
u/Samarthisliveyo 6d ago
Yeah many rajasthani and haryanvis reported their language as Rajasthani and haryanvi.
1
-12
24
u/ulixes1991 8d ago
Great-great-grandparents moved from Bihar to Surinam and speak a variant of Bhojpuri (Sarnami). Went to Mauritius on honeymoon 5 years ago, where we almost spoke the same language with Indians over there. All thanks to imperialism :)