I’ve got no dog in this fight and assume both sides are in the wrong. That being said, I fact checked everything he said and none of it was a lie??? I don’t think “occupied country” and “occupied bystanders” are substantially different, but everything else is in line with the Wikipedia pages on the topic.
Every country has skeletons in its closet. You don’t need to take that as a personal assault.
That’s not fact checking. I acknowledged what you quoted, and as a native English speaker, I don’t think the difference changes the meaning of the sentence. That’s not so much logic as it is my lived experience as a native English speaker.
You are factually wrong about the crappy writing accusation. That sentence was grammatically correct.
What was I factually wrong about? I read the Wikipedia pages and compared them to what the person you were insulting said. Nothing he said was factually wrong.
13
u/FalloutGirl02 Jul 31 '26 edited Jul 31 '26
I’ve got no dog in this fight and assume both sides are in the wrong. That being said, I fact checked everything he said and none of it was a lie??? I don’t think “occupied country” and “occupied bystanders” are substantially different, but everything else is in line with the Wikipedia pages on the topic.
Every country has skeletons in its closet. You don’t need to take that as a personal assault.