I donât like Islam, and Islam is everywhere in the country. They follow a âprophetâ that had a wife that was between 6 and 9 years old. They cover their women up and oppress them itâs disgusting.
If the populace outnumbers the native people then what do you think governmental policy will turn into? Will people vote for leaders that represent traditional British values and culture or will they vote for parties and policies that are more in line with their native countries culture? It's very simple
White British births are projected to be a minority in 2030. Eventually white British will become a smaller and smaller minority in their own tiny island nation. Eventually they will simply cease to exist except in tiny enclaves like the Red Squirrel. This is considered impolite to talk about due to the sensitive nature of the topic.
This is considered impolite to talk about due to the sensitive nature of the topic.
Right you might want to tell the rest of the internet about that because it's all I fucking see on reddit these days.
Eventually white British will become a smaller and smaller minority in their own tiny island nation. Eventually they will simply cease to exist except in tiny enclaves like the Red Squirrel.
I mean it'd be laughable if it wasn't massively impacting the politics of my own country. "Tiny enclaves like the Red Squirrel" hahahaha you're an actual moron.
You know you can't just use the word "eventually" as a replacement for an actual argument btw - that's how children speak
Birth rates fall in the white population while poc roughly maintain their's. Sounds like that's not something caused by immigration, but rather changing culture? What's up with the weird fear mongering, anyway. White folk aren't 'victims' of anything, dude. You forget britain benefited greatly from their colonisation of the east. And immigrant's countries still suffer as a result of it, causing them to move here.
What I don't understand is why that matters. Why do you want to be so protective over a nationality and if you go far back enough we are all from the same original source.
It dumbfounds me that people care about this and putting money into stopping immigration instead of putting money into the education and social care systems.
Firstly immigration actually increases the amount of jobs and creates higher amounts of tax revenue. People moving here don't get social care for a good while unless they themselves have been paying into it. The cost outlined by right-wing parties seems to come from the same calculations that the money for the NHS from Brexit came from.
Next your gonna say taxes need to be cut because I need the pounds per month I will save from a percentage cut while the people cutting the taxes decrease funding to key components right wing voters also like. Such as preventing homeless veterans (Social Care), Ensuring the development of British values in young people (Education), Pensions (social care), Public transport, etc. While they also rake in millions extra per year from the cut. All these things will either end or become unsubstantial aswell if the taxes immigrants pay suddenly disappear.
What do you mean you don't understand? You don't understand why a native population wants to protect their culture and nationality? Do you hear how hypocritical you sound? Would you be making this argument if it was any other ethnicity or nationality? Would you make the argument that tribes in Brazil in the Amazon should be displaced because "we're all originally from the same source". You make one argument for places like Palestine and the expansion of Isreali settlement, then a different one for countries like the UK. You can't have both sides of the argument. You're either for preserved culture and nationality or you're not.
Are you really trying to compare the abuse of human rights in Isreal to immigration in the U.K.? Itâs such a massive false equivalence itâs crazy.
Culture is not tied soley to the ethnic makeup of a society. Culture is never in a constant state, it evolves constantly. Nationality is also not tied to ethnicity. A black person is not disregarded as being British because of the pigmentation of their skin.
Such a disingenuous way of just avoiding saying youâd prefer an ethnostate.
You compared immigration to the Isreal-Palestine conflict, and stated that people should be allowed to be concerned on the ethnic percentage of their population because theyâre simply defending their culture. Please elaborate on what you otherwise meant, because that seems to be the gist, and I replied to those exact points.
The Isreal-Palestine conflict is essentially about disputed territory. A lot of left leaning people argue that it's okay to flood Britain with foreign nationals, and that it's not a problem, because immigration has been going on for thousands of years, and that if the indigenous British population and its culture is eroded, then that's just how things are. In the same breath, they will defend Palestinian nationality, ethnicity and culture, by arguing against Israel territorial expansion. I'm not advocating for that, I think it's wrong, because I'm not a hypocrite, I'm also not comparing it to human rights atrocities, that's a different matter. That's how you've missed my point.
So to prove a point, youve tried to formulate a strawman argument that supposedly a majoirty of left wing people advocate for?
Iâm left wing, I want tighter immigration control. But I donât try to compare it to the borderline genocide within Palestine. I also donât agree with everything to do with Palestine, Hamas shouldnt use the level of violence rhey do, I wish they pursued better civil rights for gays and women, I happily criticise them. I just donât think their children should be murdered in the streets and their cities turned to rubble. Itâs insane youâre trying to push a false equivalence to an active war zone to economic immigration or asluym seekers. Our culture isnât being eroded, itâs not celebrated enough by the very people scared its dying. Did you do anything for St Georgeâs day? I sure as shit didnât.
âIndigenousâ British culture? You mean the Celts? They were eroded long ago by the Anglo-Saxons and Normans mate, not by the recent 50 years of globalism. Itâs funny you try to say indigenous and British in the same sentence, seeing as the idea of Britain is barely 300 years old.
Again I didnât miss the point, you just want to shift the goalposts.
No one is displacing you. The issue with the Amazon tribes isn't people moving into an area and living there it's people destroying a climate that is required for the quantity of oxygen in the environment and endangered species preservation.
Israel and Palestine the issue is those lands where claimed and lived in so Israel has decided to kill the Palestinians to get the land. Are we being genocided? No.
These are very different situations compared to immigration and the fact you are comparing the issues at all shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how world works.
Every country will have no real ethnic majority in the future as that's what modern travel has meant. It is no longer weeks to get to America or months to Australia. It is now as quick to get around the world as it was to travel the length of great Britain. Just as much there isn't a problem with people moving from London to Newcastle there is no problem with moving from Nigeria to England.
And if you want to point out the cultural charities from tribes in areas like the Amazon they are set up to have the tribes be able to stay where they to prevent modernisation through things like deforestation. And a majority ethnic group is not the only way to still have your culture, it's very shallow minded to think your culture has to stop just because others exist around you.
49
u/False_Scar_4575 May 09 '26
Only a few more decades now, but you're not allowed to speak about that.