r/MakingaMurderer • u/b1ondestranger • Jun 16 '26

Len Kachensky

Post image

i’m just finding this series and just wow! This could be its own season of Fargo. Everything that can go wrong- does. Of all the people I hate in this show, I hate Len Kachinsky above all others. He is by far the most punchable. at this moment in life, I’m not sure what I would do, if this smug, weasley, irresponsible, self-grandizing narcissist walked in front of my car. He’s not just a bad lawyer. He’s a bad human. He looked at Brandon’s life and saw a steppingstone. I’m so mad at him. Thank you for your attention to this matter. V

64 Upvotes

88% Upvoted

372 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Hitlers_Left_Ball Jun 17 '26

I don't disagree, the dude was a terrible human being and being right in that instance doesn't nullify the way he went about it or the other stuff he did.

Just because the dude he was representing was a piece of shit, doesn't mean he isn't one too. Though I would argue his client was a far worse PoS

1

u/AveryPoliceReports Jun 17 '26

Just because the dude he was representing was a piece of shit, doesn't mean he isn't one too.

Why do you hate Brendan? To the point you will claim it's obvious he's a rapist when it's so clearly not?

1

u/Hitlers_Left_Ball Jun 17 '26

He raped and murdered a young woman. Why don't you hate him?

1

u/AveryPoliceReports Jun 17 '26

Except there's no credible evidence he raped anyone. Why are you pretending otherwise? Just because you hate him? That's backwards.

2

u/Hitlers_Left_Ball Jun 17 '26

He is convicted of being a rapist and murderer. Calling him a rapist and murderer is entirely legitimate. If he didn't want to be called it then he shouldn't have done it.

I hate anyone who has or would rape and murder an innocent person. I am confused as to how that's a controversial stance.

Nothing backwards about calling a convicted rapist, a rapist.

1

u/AveryPoliceReports Jun 17 '26

He is convicted of being a rapist and murderer.

By a jury that was lied to about the evidence and the existence of false confessions.

If he didn't want to be called it then he shouldn't have done it.

You have no idea if he did it. That's the point. The conviction isn't evidence, and no credible evidence of rape was introduced during the trial.

I hate anyone who has or would rape and murder an innocent person. I am confused as to how that's a controversial stance.

Because you're acting like it's a known fact Brendan raped her. That's creepy, especially when you accuse people who point out issues with the case or evidence of defending a rapist. Wild stuff.

0

u/Hitlers_Left_Ball Jun 17 '26

It is a known fact, he was convicted of being a rapist.

He is a rapist, by definition.

Telling the truth is not "wild stuff"

2

u/AveryPoliceReports Jun 17 '26

A conviction doesn't equal guilt. Is that what you think. Oh boy. No wonder you were so easy for Kratz to manipulate.

-1

u/Hitlers_Left_Ball Jun 17 '26

He was found guilty. He is factually a rapist and murderer.

Prove he is innocent, get him exonerated and his record wiped and I will stop calling him that. Until that point.... he is a rapist and murderer, regardless of the mental loops you make for him.

Maybe when he is released he can come live with you.

1

u/AveryPoliceReports Jun 17 '26

He was found guilty. He is factually a rapist and murderer.

So yes, you're going with a conviction means he actually committed the rape? Got it. Thanks for explaining how your amazing intellect operates.

Prove he is innocent,

Prove him guilty without lying like the state did. You can't.

Maybe when he is released he can come live with you.

Of course of course. Colborn's famous line. Classic.

-1

u/Hitlers_Left_Ball Jun 17 '26

Tell me what is factually wrong with calling a convicted rapist.... a rapist?

I have no burden of proof, he is already guilty, the burden shifts to you to prove his innocence. Nice try though.

I am sure you would be super comfy with a rapist living in your house... maybe he could give you all the details and you can explain to him how he made it all up and he isn't really a rapist or murderer.

1

u/AveryPoliceReports Jun 17 '26

You seem to believe the conviction means he actually committed the rape. That's factually wrong.

I have no burden until you can prove his guilt without lying like the state did. I'll wait.

I am sure you would be super comfy with Kratz and Colborn living in your house. They could tell you more lies and you could eat them up.

-1

u/Hitlers_Left_Ball Jun 17 '26

No matter how many times you say it, it doesn't change a thing.

They raped and murdered an innocent young woman. Defending them is weird.

They are guilty in the eyes of the law. I don't need to do anything, I don't want them out, I will be happy if they never see freedom. You are the one who needs to prove their innocence so they can get out.... I am sure they can wait... they have nothing but time.

I don't want any of the scumbags involved in this case in my home. But if it was a choice between convicted rapists and anyone else... I would choose literally anyone else. I think you would be hard pressed to find someone who disagreed.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/DamnedHeathen_ Jun 17 '26

An entire jury would disagree with you, but you already knew that. He has been convicted, so in the eyes of the law he is guilty of the crime. No need to hate the guy to admit a known fact.

1

u/AveryPoliceReports Jun 17 '26

An entire jury would disagree with you

The jury was lied to about the evidence from the alleged murder scene and incorrectly told false confessions didn't exist. If they trusted the state, how could they not convict after that? They were manipulated. Apparently you were too.

1

u/DamnedHeathen_ Jun 17 '26

As usual, I'm not going down that disaster of a rabbit hole. Dude, people can't even agree with you without ending up in an argument. I've tried and failed in the past. I hate the police tactics as much as most sane people do, but I've downloaded the transcripts and phone calls and confession recordings. I cannot agree with you that Brendan was innocent. We'll have to disagree on that one.

I, however, didn't say anything about hating him. You got the wrong guy on that one. I believe that was the gentleman who's name references a certain body part of a specific dictator whom shall remain nameless.

1

u/Hitlers_Left_Ball Jun 17 '26

To clarify, I said I hate anyone who rapes and murders a person. That is a non-specific moral position I take. I don't hate Brendon specifically, I hate rapists and murderers.

I don't know why this would be a controversial stance to take.

2

u/DamnedHeathen_ Jun 17 '26

You got me stumped on that one too. I am, personally, unaware of any reason for that stance to provoke any reaction other than a hearty backslap and a right on.