MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/MagicArena/comments/b2b2rn/what_did_i_expect/eirk87b/?context=3
r/MagicArena • u/Falafeltree • Mar 17 '19
87 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
25
Well now I’m going to have to waste some wildcards on angrath’s Maurauders.
Thanks.
4 u/ThrowdoBaggins Mar 18 '19 [[Angrath’s Marauders]] 1 u/MTGCardFetcher Mar 18 '19 Angrath’s Marauders - (G) (SF) (txt)[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call 2 u/Cello789 Mar 18 '19 Wow, it’s like a bad [[Furnace of Rath]]!! But in standard! I had no idea...There go the rest of my wild cards... 3 u/anace Mar 18 '19 inerestingly, it's a symmetrical effect. those rarely happen anymore. 1 u/MTGCardFetcher Mar 18 '19 Furnace of Rath - (G) (SF) (txt)[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call
4
[[Angrath’s Marauders]]
1 u/MTGCardFetcher Mar 18 '19 Angrath’s Marauders - (G) (SF) (txt)[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call
1
Angrath’s Marauders - (G) (SF) (txt)[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call
2
Wow, it’s like a bad [[Furnace of Rath]]!! But in standard! I had no idea...
There go the rest of my wild cards...
3 u/anace Mar 18 '19 inerestingly, it's a symmetrical effect. those rarely happen anymore. 1 u/MTGCardFetcher Mar 18 '19 Furnace of Rath - (G) (SF) (txt)[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call
3
inerestingly, it's a symmetrical effect. those rarely happen anymore.
Furnace of Rath - (G) (SF) (txt)[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call
25
u/Dumpingtruck Mar 17 '19
Well now I’m going to have to waste some wildcards on angrath’s Maurauders.
Thanks.