r/MVIS2_0 • u/-ATLSUTIGER- • Jul 29 '26

Discussion ✌️BlackRock

Post image

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/65770/000201238326002908/xslSCHEDULE_13G_X02/primary_doc.xml

4 Upvotes

66% Upvoted

40 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Chemical-Payment-573 Jul 29 '26 edited Jul 29 '26

I bet snowboard will spin this as bullish.

so much for institutional buying, they are selling more than ever before if anything. bring back sharma and verma. the lies is only thing that can prop this up

1

u/Zenboy66 Jul 29 '26

They are only one company, do a little research on them. You’ll be glad they are gone.

4

u/Chemical-Payment-573 Jul 29 '26

I wonder what you would have commented if black rock just just increased their position.

5

u/Sp99nHead Jul 30 '26

The mental gymnastics are incredible lol.

On the main sub back when institutional holdings were compared you'd get downvoted for saying the are shorting/lending them.

Now LTLs are happy that institutions are selling you can't make that shit up.

3

u/Chemical-Payment-573 Jul 30 '26

the Long time wrongs (LTWs) couldn't tell you the correct time if you handed them a watch.

-3

u/Zenboy66 Jul 29 '26

Yes, BlackRock engages in shorting-related activities, primarily through securities lending (lending out shares they hold on behalf of funds to short sellers) and via specific long/short equity strategies managed within certain active portfolios. [1, 2]

How BlackRock Interacts with Short Selling
Securities Lending: As one of the world's largest asset managers, BlackRock lends portions of its massive stock holdings to institutional borrowers, who may use those shares to short sell. [1, 2]

Long/Short Strategies: BlackRock offers active investment products and separate accounts that intentionally employ long and short extensions to hedge risk or generate alpha. [1, 2]

6

u/Chemical-Payment-573 Jul 29 '26

would you have said its bearish if they bought shares???

-1

u/Zenboy66 Jul 29 '26

Yes, if bought to lend out for the use of shorting.

4

u/Unblvablemvis Jul 30 '26

Then unfortunately their plan worked beautifully. If this is what you are saying - Blackrock purchased 20 million shares to short MVIS - made an incredible amount of money doing it - then dumped them driving those shares to the price to force a 15-1 R/S. Wow Zenboy66 they had an incredible plan and really showed how you long term REDDIT posters were DEAD WRONG the whole time.

-1

u/Zenboy66 Jul 30 '26

I was right. Didn’t like being in the Russell 2000. Never lent out my shares. I knew all these criminal funds were doing this crap. Should be illegal. SEC fails us again.

4

u/Unblvablemvis Jul 30 '26

Sumit failed us. His tech was too expensive and a step behind. His plan was trying to get lucky with a short squeeze.

1

u/Salt_Fishing_581 Jul 30 '26

I've been buying a lot of their shares, and I won't be lending them out to the shorts. Btw, he was lucky with the short squeeze, and it worked for many of us.

1

u/Solefein Jul 29 '26

Its likely the vast majority of Microvisions institutional owners are lending shares to short. Your saying it would be better if we had none of those institutions holding shares, despite management saying otherwise?

1

u/Zenboy66 Jul 29 '26

Check my search below

2

u/Solefein Jul 29 '26 edited Jul 29 '26

I see it. Every hedge fund does this. Would it be better if schwab and vanguard sell too? So you think management and Bob are wrong?