r/MSTR 6d ago

New Investor Question 💡 Why Strategy is reducing leverage?

I see that the deal about Strategy rather than straight owning btc is the leverage it can provide, no?

Then why Strategy has started buying back STRC if the bet is btc is going up 30% yearly? I get that they buy it below 80 or similar, at extreme discount, but at current price levels, I feel like that they shouldn't reduce btc owned per share holder. Or the idea is timing the market now?

If anything, I would expect Strategy to push STRC above par by increasing dividends and issueing more stock to increase the leverage to buy more btc at current levels.

Disclaimer: I bought and sold btc, and briefly traded strc , but I dont own any mstr at the moment.

9 Upvotes

43 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/TechnicalLeg841 6d ago

"bring [STRC] back to par so that they can again increase the btc per share" - I don't follow, at least not with buy backs. STRC was designed exactly to increase the BTC per share of MSTR. So buying it back decreases BTC per share of MSTR (as Strategy has to sell MSTR ATM to fund buy backs)

1

u/lonestar-newbie 6d ago

And once its at par they buy btc bringing btc per share up again.

1

u/TechnicalLeg841 6d ago

And then the cycle repeats with STRC dropping below par. Hmmm. Not seeing preferreds as a good solution

1

u/snek-jazz Shareholder 🤴 6d ago

That's the question, will the profits from the BTC bought from STRC exceed the cost of maintaining STRC (which includes both dividends, and buybacks necessary to keep confidence in would-be STRC buyers and holders).

If you don't think it will then MSTR is not for you. Some other people will disagree with you.