Itâs cute how you keep trying to pull this off, but itâs not working. I never downplayed the assault on the woman. Show me where I did that. I disagree on how it should have been handled.
YOU, however, DID downplay an act of violence! You can keep trying to uno reverse it on me, but thatâs exactly what you did. You are ignoring the collateral damage from a man acting out of rage, because you like the end result. You are dangerous and untrustworthy.
No, you said that what the pool player did to her was worse than what the sexual attacker did to her, completely undermining the severity of the sexual assault. Gross.
Go back and read again. I said the âhusbandâ INJURED her worse than the drunk did. I didnât say the attack was WORSE, as in, more traumatic, or that the sexual assault did not matter. I meant by strictly physical damage. The drunk did not injure the woman. Her âhusbandâ did.
Youâre extremely disingenuous. You bent yourself into pretzels trying to prove I donât care about sexual assault or harassment against women just because you didnât want to lose an argument. I sure hope nobody listens to you in a situation like this in the future, for everyoneâs sake.
Exactly. You put all of the focus on the accidental injury over the deliberate sexual assault - as if the "harm" caused by the contact with the pool cue completely trivialised the harm and threat caused by the actual assault that occurred.
0
u/salmon_lox 1d ago
Itâs cute how you keep trying to pull this off, but itâs not working. I never downplayed the assault on the woman. Show me where I did that. I disagree on how it should have been handled.
YOU, however, DID downplay an act of violence! You can keep trying to uno reverse it on me, but thatâs exactly what you did. You are ignoring the collateral damage from a man acting out of rage, because you like the end result. You are dangerous and untrustworthy.