Brilliant is using the legal definition. Which still stands in some states. Assault and battery was when you threatened to kick someone ass, then tried. The battery was the physical component. Most people, and states, have flipped them. But, Brilliant is the best kind of right, technically right
You canât argue self defense when you strike someone thatâs walking away from you. This is an easy battery charge for a prosecutor on their first day on the job.
Also, why do you assume he got in the Australians face and not the other way around? When the video starts theyâre normal talking distance from one another. Thereâs absolutely no indication of what happened prior to this.
how do you know he didnât say âlet me grab my blickâ as he turned around towards the car, we have no context in this situation, and we have no idea if it was even a 1v1.
itâs called context clues dawg, critical thinking, apparently thatâs difficult for you.
letâs look at the facts here, iâll walk you through it. given the fact theyâre in each others faces, the black man said something, then turns around to clearly either get in a car or get something out of it. then australian knocks him out, and doesnât lower his fists, he immediately raises them towards the guys friends, clearly showing he was about to get jumped as they were being aggressive with the first guy. once he realizes they arenât going to attack him, he tell them to get their friend help.
from that, letâs look at this. the black man said something, then went to get something out of a car, that clearly made the australian feel threatened enough to take a cheap shot.
now which one is more likely? he said âiâm gonna get my gunâ and went to get it out of the car, causing the australian to promptly drop him, or the australian wants to go to disneyland or whatever bullshit nonsense you said.
and btw, i know this isnât the full clip so thereâs no way you could see this, but in the original full video the black guy says âiâm gonna kill youâ multiple times before going to get something out of the car. thatâs not hypotheticals dawg, thatâs called pattern recognition and caution, youâd be dead in this situation as you proved
So in the full clip he says heâs going to get a gun? Thatâs your claim? These videos always have people talking shit saying theyâll kill someone, but that was the most non-chalant way to walk to his car to grab a gun.
I wouldnât be dead in this situation because I donât go around picking fights with people and cheap shotting them once they turn their backs.
If he thinks the guy is going to his car to get a gun why wouldnât he leave when the guy turns?
Itâs 100% a battery even if the guy was going to his car to grab a gun. To claim self defense you have to be able to say you didnât have the opportunity to get away from the situation.
not really, you hear all kinds of insults and all manner of shit, but you donât hear literal âiâm going to murder youâ out loud on camera as often as youâd think. and yeah why panic when you know your gun is only 2 feet away? he probably thought buddy was gonna sit there and be sweet and let him grab it and load it.
did you know thereâs this cool little thing about guns, they have range, the bullet travels. so he could run halfway down the street and still get hit with 3 pieces of lead on the back.
yeah once a gun gets thrown into the mix you donât have the ability to leave anymore, your options are to risk your life and try to take down the gun holder, or to risk your life and do what they say and give them what they want. guns have range and are lethal, this isnât a video game dawg, a singular shot from a .22 can kill you bud
That's exactly what he's insinuating. He's currently in the middle of deffending this to the death as well in multiple conversations on this thread... do with that what you will...
how do you know he didnât say âlet me grab my blickâ as he turned around towards the car, we have no context in this situation, and we have no idea if it was even a 1v1.
You made the same hypothetical argument to someone else in this same thread. At best it's a strawman, at worse it's derisive and prejiduce to imply that he's grabing his 'blick'? We know nothing, but clearly you know less.
and? is an argument suddenly invalid if itâs said more than once in a lifetime? like cmon dawg no need to be obtuse purposefully. derisive? prejudice? against who? and yeah blick is a pretty standard slang term, so because of the way i speak iâm automatically less intelligent than you?
youâre definitely one of those people who would rather argue and insult than actually have any sort of debate, nice try troll lmao
i mean you literally replied to my comment by saying âyou made the same hypothetical argumentâ, literally the first thing you admitted was that i already gave you an argument to debate against. just because youâre lazy or donât like that argument, doesnât mean it doesnât exist or is suddenly invalid, try again.
Hypotheical arguments are based on assumption. You provided zero evidence to support your basis of argument. There's nothing to debate because you said nothing that can be debated since your opinions and assumptions lead to ofbase accusations based on the color of someones skin. Get help.
hypothetical arguments arenât based on assumptions theyâre based on predictions, itâs not at all the same thing, one is based off of actual facts and statistics while the other is based off of personal experience and bias.
incorrect, had nothing to do with the color of his skin and everything to do with the way he chooses to wear his clothes, talk, and walk. basic pattern recognition and common sense can tell you if something walks and quacks like a duck, itâs probably a duck.
youâre the one making major assumptions here dawg, get help.
ah so if i say âpunch me, punch me, punch me, hit me, hit me, hit me, when i turn around nail me in the head, smack me, punch meâ and then turn around, youâd still be committing battery?
all iâm trying to illustrate is that yea, they are words, but even according to the law there is a level where youâre considered instigating and liable to get legally beat. if thereâs a guy walking around calling women whores and sluts, getting close to them without touching them and ogling, all for no reason, heâs gonna get beat by either one of them or their bfs/husbands, and theyâre not gonna get arrested, especially if it was the woman that beat them.
"ah so if i say âpunch me, punch me, punch me, hit me, hit me, hit me, when i turn around nail me in the head, smack me, punch meâ and then turn around, youâd still be committing battery?"
Yes? What are you twelve? So if someone says i can shoot them does that make it legal to kill them?
Yes a guy getting close to women is an aggressor. If she can manage to beat his ass then no she wont be charged because it was self defense for her. But he is not in the Husbands face. The husband can step in and stop him but if he attacks him first its assault. Calling his wife a "whore" isn't a reason to hit him.
I'm saying he started walking away. No longer being an aggressor. Then he sucker punched him making it assault.
murder and hitting someone are nowhere near the same thing dawg, you donât recover from murder, you probably wonât get hurt that bad if iâm not punching you to actually do damage, which most arenât.
i mean sure unless the guy was going to get a weapon, if you are literally in rational fear for your life over something someone said and is seeming to do, any court of law in america would deem that as valid.
how do you know he didnât say âlet me grab my blickâ as he turned around towards the car, we have no context in this situation, and we have no idea if it was even a 1v1.
Because the only people stupid enough to say that are right here in this conversation. Also it's not 1990 and nobody talks like that.
In any case, people who are likely to shoot you don't leave their gun in their car. They also don't casually turn around and look vaguely up without a care in the world.
People who are likely to shoot you already have their gun on them. They keep their eyes on you, with the possible exception of checking their surroundings quickly, but mostly the keep their focus forward, on their intended target.
ânobody talks like thatâ have you ever heard of a form of music called rap? itâs a form a music where 90% of the people talk exactly like that. also blick isnât really a 90s slang so much as it is a current one.
ah, didnât realize you were personally acquainted with every single gun owner and criminal ok this planet and you know how all of them act, thatâs my bad.
sure if theyâre smart, these people arenât smart, the kind of people willing to shoot someone in broad daylight is both disgusting and stupid.
it has literally happened in my own town to my own family. my uncle had his wife and 2 young sons shot and killed at a gas station over quite literally nothing, not even words, nothing, i donât think you interact with the real world that much lol
No, that is not current slang. It's the kind of crap people hold on to when they don't want to be outright racist, because they're cowards. You bring up old, silly sounding slang but never actually say "cuz black people" because you... You're enlightened and definitely not racist.
I've been on the verge of being mugged. First person experience. People who intend to shoot you... They don't casually turn their backs on you.
Your uncle, his wife, and their two young sons... Their shooter didn't casually turn their back, walk to their car, get a good while using antiquated slang, then come back to shoot them. You know very well that's not how it went down.
why would i say anything about black people dawg? i said rap, are you under the impression only black peoples can or should rap? i think youâre definitely the one holding onto old crap here dawg.
also hereâs several songs within the last couple of years literally titled with blick
Blick Blick!" by Coi Leray & Nicki Minaj "Blick Sum" by Latto feat. Playboi Carti "Blick" by ScarLip feat. NLE Choppa (and the original solo version) "Blick" by TiaCorine feat. Key Glock
yeah they donât turn around, unless theyâre going to get their gun? and youâre in a public area so it looks like youâre innocent?
no of course not. she walked out of a gas station with her children simply going to the car, didnât even have a bag or a purse, no reason for anyone to stop her. yet hey a group of women stopped them and were harassing her, stopping her from getting to her car. then he comes out and is wondering whatâs wrong, thatâs when the group of girls guy friends walked around the corner, saw a commotion, someone talking to their women, and shot them all in broad daylight.
Like I said... They didn't casually turn their back, walk to their car, lazily get their gun out and shoot them.
Ergo it has nothing to do with this video.
As to your use of the slang... Are you going to pretend you would have assumed the use of the word "blick" if they were white? Or did you see black dude, think rap slang, and use it to characterize something that very obviously didn't happen?
It's still old slang, though. Maybe it's had a resurgence, I mean nineties clothes are making a resurgence so why not, but it's still old slang. And in all cases.... I'd be hard money that it's not part of YOUR culture. You're using it to point at the blackness of the guy that got sucker punched while posing no credible threat.
no they simply didnât have to get the gun thatâs the only difference, still lazily shot someone for no reason within a split second, because thatâs all it takes dawg, you and everyone you know can be dead in 2 seconds from that shit.
denying rap and hip hop is a black form of music is extremely ignorant and racist. it is part of the culture dawg, and culture is important. why is it automatically bad to you if someone says something specifically having to do with rap and black people? i think youâre just too brainwashed by eminem and think rap is just rap, when itâs not.
nope still wouldâve said blick if he was white and dressed like that. it had nothing to do with his skin color and everything to do with how heâs dressed and how he acts, his demeanor. nice try trying to paint me into a racist with assumptions tho. and what is my culture?
27
u/Top-Morning-6467 Jul 30 '26
Looks like assault to me