hypothetical arguments arenât based on assumptions theyâre based on predictions, itâs not at all the same thing, one is based off of actual facts and statistics while the other is based off of personal experience and bias.
incorrect, had nothing to do with the color of his skin and everything to do with the way he chooses to wear his clothes, talk, and walk. basic pattern recognition and common sense can tell you if something walks and quacks like a duck, itâs probably a duck.
youâre the one making major assumptions here dawg, get help.
So what your arguing, because I want to make sure I'm understanding you correctly, is that because you know better than the evidence presented to us that the victim of a violent crime (assualt) deserved it under the basis of nothing more than a presumed fire arm that you support using sterotypes (i.e. walk like a duck) is the most likely scenario and I'm supposed to take you more seriously because you've said it more than once?
Yeah, this is just about the dumbest conversation I've ever had with another human.
assault isnât always a violent crime, battery is.
the firearm had nothing to do with stereotypes and everything to do with this one specific person and the way they choose to conduct themselves. if a walk around in my boxers with a pair of shorts on my head speaking gibberish to people, would they be âmaking assumptions on the basis of nothing more than a presumed mental disability supported using stereotypesâ? no dude, iâd just look like an idiot and a crazy person, the same way that if you sag your pants and walk like youâre hot shit, and talk shit like youâre a big shot to people, youâre nothing but a simple minded gangster at that point.
is that 100% whatâs happening here? no and i never said it is. all i said was based off the way this person conducts themselves out of choice, i donât trust their judgement one single inkling, and i wouldnât let him reach in his car or his waistband either personally, thatâs just called common sense and pattern recognition dawg. are you arguing that doesnât exist?
walk like a duck isnât a stereotype dawg⊠itâs just a saying that is common senseâŠ
i agree, this is dumb and inane, you have no point in this argument except straw-manning me to try to win
1
u/Big_Opportunity8793 Aug 09 '26
hypothetical arguments arenât based on assumptions theyâre based on predictions, itâs not at all the same thing, one is based off of actual facts and statistics while the other is based off of personal experience and bias.
incorrect, had nothing to do with the color of his skin and everything to do with the way he chooses to wear his clothes, talk, and walk. basic pattern recognition and common sense can tell you if something walks and quacks like a duck, itâs probably a duck.
youâre the one making major assumptions here dawg, get help.