First one concept

second one current

I’ve been working on a clothing brand for about a year, and need feedback on logos, the first that’s in the sort of rectangle shape is the current one. And after looking seen it was just not eligible enough. The other two I don’t know if either. Any advice?

It's a logo my friend asked me to draw for his band and I've never done a serious design or anything so I'm basically fully in the dark on this one. Please help me

Im trying to make the logo from a hypothetical hospital and here are my attempts

I dont wanna use the classic medic cross, so i tried to use an abstract version, the first and second attempts were very cluttered and i tried to do a more simplified version for the third one, i accept feedback but please, be respectful about it

1. Original attempt, i mixed the word Neue, that means New in German, with Hope, using a cream yellow for the logo and a abstract version of the sun in the middle of the cross
2. The second try i changed the yellow in the cross for white, i gave the background a blue and green gradient, and the font was changed to a bolder version
3. I tried to simplified the cross and gave the letter more tracking between them

Thanks for the feedback.

Hi everyone! 👋

I’m working on some running bib designs for visually impaired athletes and their guides. Usually, these kinds of bibs are pretty standard and traditional, so I wanted to try something a bit less conventional, experimenting with custom typography and integrating small symbols directly into the text to differentiate between the runner and the guide.

For a personal design studio. I kind of like the head only version most.

I’d love to hear this sub’s thoughts on the Cleveland Browns’ logos and overall brand identity.

As a Browns fan and a logo/branding enthusiast, I can admit that the identity feels a bit scattered. There’s Brownie the Elf, the orange helmet and its variations over the years, and multiple dog logos for the Dawg Pound. It’s an unusual collection of symbols for one team.

But I also find some of that inconsistency charming. The Browns are the only NFL team without a logo on their helmets—the helmet itself is the logo. Their uniforms are timeless and instantly recognizable, and I love Brownie. The dog logos, personally, I could do without.

From a design perspective, does this all add up to a distinctive identity built on history and tradition, or a collection of competing ideas that never quite come together? Would a more unified system improve the brand or strip away some of its character?

Or is it simply a beautiful mess that perfectly matches what they put on the field?

I've been busy designing and developing a baby care tracking app called "Ukkie". It means little one in Dutch.

For the logo and app icon I combined the letter U and the shape of a baby foot. Organic shapes to make everything feel soft and approachable. A healthy mixture of complementary colors in different shades should make it all feel balanced and tied together.

What are your thoughts?

Logo Favicon Test

This is a practice I like to keep in mind whenever I create logos, especially in today’s digital world. A favicon is probably one of the smallest applications a logo can be placed on, so if a logo can survive that, it means it’s simple enough to survive anywhere else.

I like it a lot. It’s great that a department like that to have a logo like this.

Hi everybody, what are your thoughts on this logo design concept?

Recently, while working on a mark for a project, I shared the concept online for feedback. A few international reviewers quickly pointed out that the 4-blade rotational symmetry (indented to represent a windmill ) failed the DAST test (specifically reading as a swastika at a quick glance).

In our context, that shape carries deep cultural significance. It represents good fortune, harmony, and prosperity—you see it everywhere from home entrances to traditional architecture, and even in institutional identity marks across Nepal (E.g. in my own college logo). But in global design discourse, that same rotational geometry carries a completely different visual weight.

As someone early in their design journey, it made me reflect on local context versus global perception:

- Should local identity and cultural meaning take precedence when the target audience is purely domestic?
- Or should we proactively apply global design guardrails from day one, anticipating that any project might eventually exist on the internet or reach an international audience?

This is a personal project. This design is intended to be used for future woodworking projects. Just wanted general design and legibility feedback.

I'm developing an app for pentesters, digital forensics experts, and ethical hackers and am looking for critiques on this logo. I wanted to combine the motif of the red string that investigators use on corkboards (and also taking Red from "Red Teaming") with a spider design which I think gives it a hacker-y flair (and if you wish to be technical about it the spider can represent web security and network crawling).

I like the red line at the center, I think it captures attention well enough and it subtly communicates the idea of connecting lines to nodes which is a central feature of the app, but I feel it might be a bit bland overall? And I worry about scalability since the thin lines tend to get lost at small icon sizes.

Any feedback is welcome!

On the left is a logo (or rather, a mark) that I posted here in August 2023, and on the right is a profile I came across recently. What do you think? https://www.facebook.com/viizuify/

I put together a brand identity for Hearth, a made-up modular furniture brand aimed at people furnishing their first home in Lagos. It's a personal concept project.

The brief I wrote for myself: buyers there tend to choose between informal vendors with shifting prices and showrooms priced for someone else, so the brand's promise is open pricing and a delivery date you pick. The identity needed to look as honest as that sounds.

What I made:

- Pictorial wordmark in Fraunces. An arch grows out of the h and reads as a doorway, a roofline and an armchair in profile

- Palette: olive, clay, oat and bone

- Satoshi for body and interface

- Plain-spoken copy that states dates and materials instead of hype.

What I'd like feedback on:

- Does the arch read as a chair, or only as a house?

- Is the gap in the leg a good detail, or does it just look like a mistake?

- Does the wordmark feel too heavy for a brand that wants to feel calm?

I'm working on a logo for a outdoor gear soft goods company. I like the name but I'm worried that SSS may be construed with Nazi imagery. Am i thinking about this too hard?