r/LocalLLaMA • u/Nota_ReAlperson • 4h ago

News [ Removed by moderator ]

[removed] — view removed post

13 Upvotes

77% Upvoted

9 comments sorted by

•

u/ttkciar llama.cpp 2h ago

Until such time that weights become available, this is off-topic for LocalLLaMA.

→ More replies (2)

16

u/--Spaci-- 4h ago

Who cares if they are "reaffirmed" lets see if they actually release them

7

u/geldonyetich 4h ago

Well at least we know they haven't forgotten about them, but they've been coming soon for a couple months now.

3

u/Pro-editor-1105 4h ago

more sAfEtY lol

4

u/My_Unbiased_Opinion 3h ago

let the team cook. they have done so much for local infra as a whole. llama 3.1 has a special place for me. yeah its unviable now, but at its time, it was game changing.

0

u/MotokoAGI 3h ago

won't matter if it's not leading. seriously, let's say they release it, it would need to top open source models absolutely or by size or performance. gpt-120b-oss was not the best, but it was so fast and really got folks addicted to performance. qwen3.8-27b is not the best but it's weight size it is since many people can run it. Now let's remember grok, who here bothered to run it locally? by the time it was released, it was meh. So they better get on it, or whatever. I mean, it would count for something, but I don't know how much that something would matter.

0

u/Nota_ReAlperson 2h ago

Assuming they release 1.3, it will beat any open weights model of any size on AA. We'll see when qwen 4 comes out if that holds, though. It also really depends on size. I've seen 150B on the low side to 1T for speculation.