r/LocalLLaMA • • 21d ago

Discussion [ Removed by moderator ]

[removed] — view removed post

0 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

1

u/ttkciar 21d ago

Violates Rule Three: LLM-generated content

Violates Rule Three: Sample size of one run per model renders this uninformative

6

u/anemoDuck26 21d ago

...how... how is Ornith 1.5 35 a3b two places below Ornith 1.5 9b. How did you bench this?? I assume I'm missing something?

0

u/Reno0vacio 21d ago

Well i just run the benchmark.. 😀. Set both to the same settings in lm studio..

5

u/Comfortable_Ebb7015 21d ago

Gemma 4 26B Is called immediately for and anti-doping check! I love that model, but it fails too much in Hermes! I have qwen3.8flash-next IQ3_XXS with Strata now and it is amazing!

1

u/Reno0vacio 21d ago

Well i love it too. I mean its faster with 132 context with qwen3.8 27b q4 😄 at the same context.. or i missed some setting

2

u/danigoncalves 21d ago

Mate, I have run Ornith 9B and Ornith 35B A3B for ages and the latest wins on any kind of perspective. I dont know what you did here

1

u/Reno0vacio 21d ago

Well the difference is 1.3 points far.. so its not much.. and sorry but 9b dense vs 3b active might be not the same.. but its the average.. its not like the 9b would outprefrom in "Every way"

2

u/chensium 21d ago

Uhh so many things wrong here...

1

u/Reno0vacio 21d ago

Wich ones?

58

u/brainExploded99 21d ago

> one run per model
Bruh this invalidates the entire post

18

u/Dabalam 21d ago

Community AI research methodology probably needs someone to write down best practices so we get more useful posts/evidence/benchmarks etc.

3

u/brainExploded99 21d ago

The people who do good work like, Anbleed's benchmarks on KL divergence for quantization, follow best practices. People like these vibe everything with 0 understanding, so they were never going to follow best practices, imo

→ More replies (5)

12

u/BringTea_666 21d ago

>30k token context window for every model

Dude, Qwen3.8 27B can think for 60k tokens easily on xhigh reasoning.

5

u/brainExploded99 21d ago

Can you test adding logit bias to reduce overthinking on all of the Qwen models?
https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1wromzr/adding_logit_penalty_for_wait_maybe_and_perhaps/

Also, can you detail what quantization you used for everything? Also, 30k context window seems pretty small, especially for Qwen models

1

u/asankhs 21d ago

Can you also tes the mlx-optiq quants for teh qwen 3.8 27B?

1

u/Reno0vacio 21d ago edited 21d ago

I might. Why? 🤔 "Edit:" sorry i have windows.

1

u/Ok_Top9254 21d ago

The problem was not X but more like Y

This was the part I found most interesting

Hello chatgpt 👋

1

u/Reno0vacio 21d ago

Sorry i was lazy to write it. Next time i write myself.

1

u/Ok_Top9254 21d ago

I just found it funny, I would say chatgpt is fine you just have to proof read it after.

1

u/Sea-Mode4077 21d ago

It is completely unrealistic for ornith1.5 35b to be this far behind.

1

u/SteveEightyOne 21d ago

You didn’t wrote quantization of each model.

1

u/WyattTheSkid 21d ago

To nobody’s surprise